HIGH 7.2

CVE-2026-9717: OS Command Injection in Schneider Electric PowerLogic P7

CVE-2026-9717 is a command injection flaw in Schneider Electric PowerLogic P7 that allows a privileged user with network access to execute arbitrary system commands with elevated privileges. An authenticated administrator or high-privilege account can craft specially crafted input to bypass command filtering and run unauthorized code, potentially compromising the entire device. The vulnerability requires existing authentication but no user interaction—an attacker with valid credentials can exploit it remotely.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.2 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-78
Affected products
2 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-25 / 2026-07-01

NVD description (verbatim)

CWE-78 Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability exists that could allow unauthorized execution of commands with elevated privileges, impacting system integrity, confidentiality, and availability when a privileged authenticated user interacts with a vulnerable network-exposed service.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

This is a CWE-78 OS command injection vulnerability in Schneider Electric PowerLogic P7 and its firmware. The affected service does not adequately neutralize special shell metacharacters in user-supplied input before passing it to a system command interpreter. An attacker with privileged authentication credentials can inject OS commands that execute with elevated privileges, circumventing normal security controls. The vulnerability is network-accessible, has low attack complexity, and requires high-privilege credentials but no additional user interaction to trigger.

Business impact

Exploitation could result in complete compromise of PowerLogic P7 devices. An attacker gaining command execution with elevated privileges can exfiltrate sensitive operational data (monitoring and control information), modify system configuration, disable monitoring and alerting, or cause denial of service. For organizations relying on PowerLogic P7 for energy management and power quality analysis, this poses significant operational risk and potential regulatory compliance impact if availability or data integrity is compromised.

Affected systems

Schneider Electric PowerLogic P7 and its associated firmware versions are affected. Organizations using PowerLogic P7 for power monitoring and analytics in industrial, commercial, or critical infrastructure environments should verify their specific firmware versions against Schneider Electric's advisory to determine exposure. The vulnerability requires network access to the device and valid privileged credentials.

Exploitability

While this vulnerability requires an authenticated user with high-privilege access (CVSS PR:H), the network attack vector and low attack complexity mean exploitation is straightforward once an attacker obtains or compromises privileged credentials. The lack of KEV designation suggests this has not yet been publicly exploited, but the attack surface—network exposure combined with common credential compromise scenarios—makes it a reasonable concern for organizations with internet-facing or untrusted-network-adjacent PowerLogic P7 devices.

Remediation

Schneider Electric has released patches to address this vulnerability. Organizations should apply the patched firmware versions to all affected PowerLogic P7 devices. Verify the specific firmware version on each device and cross-reference it against Schneider Electric's security advisory to confirm the appropriate patched version. Interim mitigations include restricting network access to PowerLogic P7 devices via firewall rules, limiting privilege levels for user accounts, and disabling remote access if operationally feasible.

Patch guidance

Contact Schneider Electric or consult their security advisory for the specific patched firmware versions applicable to your PowerLogic P7 devices. Firmware updates should be tested in a non-production environment first to ensure compatibility with existing monitoring and control workflows. Schedule patching during a maintenance window to minimize operational disruption. After patching, verify that all functionality has been restored and that no legacy accounts with unnecessary privilege levels remain active.

Detection guidance

Monitor PowerLogic P7 logs for unusual command execution, particularly commands with shell metacharacters (pipes, semicolons, backticks) originating from authenticated sessions. Review access logs to identify which accounts have accessed the device and when. Network-based detection could flag attempts to inject command metacharacters in requests to the PowerLogic P7 service. Maintain baseline inventory of legitimate administrative access patterns and alert on deviations.

Why prioritize this

Despite not being in the KEV catalog, this vulnerability warrants priority attention because it combines network accessibility, elevated-privilege command execution, and complete system compromise potential (high CVSS score of 7.2). While exploitation requires high-privilege credentials, compromised admin accounts are common attack outcomes. PowerLogic P7 devices are often part of critical operational infrastructure, making availability and integrity failures particularly impactful.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 (HIGH) reflects: (1) network attack vector—no physical proximity required; (2) low attack complexity—straightforward exploitation once authenticated; (3) high privilege requirement—partially mitigating factor; (4) high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability—complete system compromise possible. The lack of user interaction (UI:N) means no social engineering is needed. The score is high but not critical because authentication is required, yet organizations should treat it as urgent given the control and monitoring nature of affected devices.

Frequently asked questions

Do we need to patch immediately if our PowerLogic P7 devices are behind a firewall?

Yes. While network segmentation reduces exposure, the vulnerability still poses significant risk if an internal user or compromised internal system gains access. Patching is the definitive remediation. Firewall restrictions should be a temporary supplement, not a replacement for patches.

What if we don't have the latest firmware version handy?

First, verify your current firmware version on each PowerLogic P7 device (usually found in device settings or management interface). Cross-reference it against Schneider Electric's security advisory to determine if you are affected. If patched versions are not immediately available or if staging takes time, implement network access controls (whitelist IP ranges, disable unused ports) and audit privileged account access until patches can be deployed.

Can this vulnerability be exploited by non-privileged users?

No. The vulnerability requires authenticated access with high-privilege credentials—typically an administrator account. However, credential compromise (phishing, insider threat, or lateral movement) is a realistic attack path, so you should treat this as a priority even if you have many privileged accounts.

Is there a workaround if we cannot patch immediately?

Network isolation is the most effective interim measure: restrict access to PowerLogic P7 to specific trusted IP ranges or management networks, and disable remote access if operationally acceptable. Additionally, enforce strong authentication, implement multi-factor authentication on administrator accounts if supported, and audit access logs regularly. These do not eliminate the vulnerability but significantly reduce exploitation risk until patches are applied.

This analysis is based on publicly available vulnerability data as of the stated publication date. Specific patch version numbers, firmware release schedules, and detailed technical indicators should be verified directly with Schneider Electric's official security advisories and product documentation. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific network architecture, device inventory, and threat model. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided or endorsed. Use of this information is subject to SEC.co's terms of service and applicable cybersecurity regulations in your jurisdiction. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-03. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).