CVE-2025-41266: Waterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability Analysis
A command injection vulnerability exists in the Waterfall WF-500 TX Host administration interface that allows authenticated users with elevated privileges to execute arbitrary system commands. An attacker who has already gained administrative access can leverage this flaw to run operating system-level commands, potentially compromising the entire appliance. The vulnerability affects version 7.9.1.0 R2502171040 and requires the attacker to be authenticated and have high-level privileges, reducing but not eliminating the risk in environments where admin credential exposure is a concern.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.2 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-78
- Affected products
- 2 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-05-29 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Administration WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX Host in version 7.9.1.0 R2502171040 that allows remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the WF-500 TX Host.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2025-41266 is an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) discovered in the Administration WebUI component of Waterfall WF-500 TX Host. The flaw stems from improper neutralization of special elements in operating system commands, allowing authenticated administrators to inject and execute arbitrary OS commands. The vulnerability carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 (HIGH) with a vector indicating network-accessible exploitation, no required user interaction beyond authentication, and complete impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Successful exploitation grants an attacker command-line execution privileges on the WF-500 TX Host system itself.
Business impact
Compromise of a WF-500 TX Host through this vulnerability could enable an attacker to bypass network segmentation controls, access sensitive industrial or operational data, modify appliance configurations, or pivot to downstream OT/IT systems. In critical infrastructure or industrial control environments where Waterfall appliances enforce segmentation, this flaw could undermine the security posture of an entire protected network. Organizations relying on WF-500 devices as a security boundary should treat successful exploitation as a potential breach of that boundary.
Affected systems
The vulnerability affects Waterfall Security WF-500 TX Host running firmware version 7.9.1.0 R2502171040. Check your deployment inventory to confirm if this specific version is in use. Waterfall Security has released updates addressing this issue; verify the vendor advisory for patched firmware versions available for your environment.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires an attacker to have already obtained valid administrative credentials and network access to the Administration WebUI. This prerequisite authentication and privilege requirement significantly limits opportunistic exploitation from the public internet. However, in environments where administrative credentials are shared, logged in persistently, or compromised through phishing or lateral movement, an insider threat or post-compromise attacker could leverage this vulnerability without external detection barriers. The network accessibility and lack of user interaction requirements (beyond authentication) mean that any authenticated admin session—legitimate or compromised—can trigger the flaw.
Remediation
Contact Waterfall Security and consult the vendor security advisory for available firmware patches. Apply patches to all affected WF-500 TX Host systems, prioritizing those in critical infrastructure or high-security-boundary deployments. Waterfall Security typically provides firmware updates through their update mechanism; follow the vendor's guidance for safe patching in your environment. Verify patch application by confirming firmware version post-update.
Patch guidance
Obtain the latest firmware version from Waterfall Security's support portal or security advisory. Coordinate patching with your change management process, as WF-500 appliances may require brief downtime during firmware updates. Test patches in a non-production environment first if feasible. Verify the patched firmware version to confirm the update was successful and that the vulnerable version is no longer running.
Detection guidance
Monitor Administration WebUI access logs for unusual administrative activity, particularly sessions from unexpected source IPs or at unusual times. Look for command injection patterns in web server logs (e.g., special characters like backticks, $(), pipes, or semicolons in URL parameters or POST data). Endpoint detection and response (EDR) or command execution monitoring on the WF-500 TX Host itself may reveal suspicious OS command execution originating from the WebUI process. Implement strict authentication controls and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for Administration WebUI access to reduce the likelihood of compromised admin credentials being leveraged.
Why prioritize this
While this vulnerability requires pre-existing administrative authentication, the consequences of exploitation in a security appliance are severe: successful exploitation can completely compromise the device's ability to enforce network segmentation or access controls. In environments where the WF-500 TX Host is trusted as a security boundary, this is a critical risk. The HIGH CVSS score (7.2) and complete impact across CIA triad warrant prompt patching. Organizations should prioritize this based on the WF-500's role in their security architecture—appliances protecting critical infrastructure or sensitive networks should be patched immediately.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 (HIGH) reflects the combination of network accessibility, complete impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, and the need for high-privilege authentication. The score does not account for context-specific factors such as whether the appliance is internet-facing, the strength of admin credential controls, or the criticality of the protected network. Organizations should adjust their internal risk rating based on deployment specifics: WF-500 devices in critical infrastructure contexts should be considered CRITICAL priority, while those in lower-risk environments may warrant a slightly lower urgency.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited by unauthenticated attackers?
No. The vulnerability requires valid administrative credentials and authentication to the Administration WebUI. However, if admin credentials are compromised through phishing, credential theft, or lateral movement, an attacker can exploit the flaw without further barriers.
What is the difference between the WF-500 and other Waterfall products?
The vulnerability is specific to the WF-500 TX Host. If you operate other Waterfall Security products, confirm their model numbers against the vendor advisory to determine if they are affected. Do not assume all Waterfall products are vulnerable.
If we restrict access to the Administration WebUI to a trusted internal network, are we protected?
Network segmentation and access controls significantly reduce risk by limiting who can reach the WebUI. However, this is a defense-in-depth control and does not eliminate the vulnerability. Patching is still required, as insider threats or lateral movement from a compromised internal system could still exploit the flaw.
What should we do if we cannot patch immediately?
Implement compensating controls: restrict Administration WebUI access to specific trusted IP addresses, enforce strong multi-factor authentication for admin logins, monitor admin activity closely, and consider temporarily disabling the WebUI if operationally feasible. These measures reduce risk but do not eliminate it; patching should remain your primary objective.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes by SEC.co and is based on publicly disclosed vulnerability data current as of the publication date. Security researchers and organizations should verify all vendor information, patch availability, and affected version details directly with Waterfall Security's official security advisory before making patching or remediation decisions. This analysis does not constitute professional security advice; consult with your security team and the vendor for guidance specific to your environment. Exploits or proof-of-concept code for this vulnerability should not be developed, shared, or executed outside of authorized security testing. The absence of this vulnerability from the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog does not guarantee it has not been exploited in the wild; continue monitoring for suspicious activity regardless of KEV status. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-41265HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host OS Command Injection (CVSS 7.2)
- CVE-2025-41267HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-41279HIGHOS Command Injection in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host Administration WebUI
- CVE-2025-41281HIGHWaterfall WF-500 OS Command Injection
- CVE-2025-69755HIGHNeterbit NW-431F Router RCE and Data Exposure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10214HIGHCommand Injection in chatgpt-on-wechat Bash Tool
- CVE-2026-10219HIGHGoClaw Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10273HIGHRemote Code Execution in php-censor Webhook Handler