CVE-2026-58452: JAIOTlink C492A-W6 Command Injection RCE Vulnerability
JAIOTlink C492A-W6 Wi-Fi IP cameras contain a command injection flaw in their firmware that allows attackers who have valid login credentials to execute arbitrary system commands on the device. The vulnerability exists in the network configuration endpoint and can be triggered by crafting a specially formatted network parameter. An attacker with authenticated access could use this to gain complete control over the camera, potentially enabling lateral movement into the broader network infrastructure.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-78
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-01 / 2026-07-02
NVD description (verbatim)
JAIOTlink C492A-W6 Wi-Fi IP cameras running firmware 4.8.30.57701411 contain an OS command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to achieve remote code execution by supplying a malicious Wireless parameter to the HTTP PUT NetSDK/Factory SetMAC endpoint. Attackers can craft a string beginning with a valid MAC-like prefix followed by a semicolon and a shell payload, which bypasses partial sscanf() validation and is passed unsanitized into an echo shell command executed through a system() wrapper.
3 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-58452 is an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) affecting JAIOTlink C492A-W6 cameras running firmware version 4.8.30.57701411. The vulnerability exists in the NetSDK/Factory SetMAC HTTP PUT endpoint, which accepts a Wireless parameter intended to store MAC address information. The input validation relies on sscanf() to parse and validate the MAC address format, but this check is incomplete. Attackers can bypass it by crafting a string with a valid MAC-like prefix, followed by a semicolon and arbitrary shell commands. This malformed input is then passed unsanitized into an echo command executed via system(), allowing direct shell command execution with the privileges of the camera's web service process.
Business impact
Compromise of IP cameras can lead to unauthorized surveillance, deletion or corruption of recorded footage, use of cameras as pivot points for internal network reconnaissance, deployment of malware or botnet agents, and potential compliance violations under regulations like HIPAA or GDPR if cameras monitor sensitive areas. In enterprise settings, compromised cameras can facilitate advanced persistent threats by providing attackers with persistent network access and situational awareness of physical security controls.
Affected systems
JAIOTlink C492A-W6 Wi-Fi IP cameras running firmware version 4.8.30.57701411 are affected. Organizations should inventory all instances of this model and verify running firmware versions. The broader JAIOTlink product line should be reviewed to determine if similar vulnerable code patterns exist in other models or firmware branches.
Exploitability
This vulnerability requires authenticated access—an attacker must possess valid login credentials to reach the vulnerable endpoint. While this reduces the attack surface compared to unauthenticated flaws, authenticated access can be obtained through credential compromise, default credentials, weak password policies, or lateral movement from another compromised system. Once authenticated, exploitation is trivial and does not require user interaction or specialized tools. The CVSS score of 8.8 (HIGH) reflects the combination of network accessibility, low attack complexity, and complete impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Remediation
Organizations must update affected cameras to a patched firmware version released by JAIOTlink. Verify the availability of firmware updates through the vendor's support portal or advisory channels. Until patching is feasible, implement network segmentation to restrict administrative access to cameras, enforce strong authentication on all camera management interfaces, and disable the SetMAC endpoint if not operationally required. Monitor for suspicious HTTP PUT requests to NetSDK endpoints and audit logs for unexpected privilege escalations or command executions on camera devices.
Patch guidance
Obtain and test the latest JAIOTlink firmware for the C492A-W6 model through the vendor's official support channels. Verify that the patched version addresses input validation in the SetMAC endpoint. Deploy patches in a controlled manner, starting with test devices to confirm functionality and that no operational features are degraded. Document the original and patched firmware versions for compliance and audit purposes. After patching, verify that the Wireless parameter properly rejects or sanitizes shell metacharacters.
Detection guidance
Search HTTP access logs for PUT requests to paths containing 'NetSDK/Factory' or 'SetMAC'. Flag requests with Wireless parameters containing shell metacharacters (semicolons, pipes, backticks, ampersands, parentheses, or command substitution syntax). Monitor camera system logs for unexpected process spawning or privilege escalation events. Correlate authentication events with subsequent abnormal activity. Network intrusion detection signatures can be developed to identify payloads with MAC-like prefixes followed by semicolons. Test detection logic using benign test payloads before deployment to production monitoring.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability should be prioritized for remediation because it provides authenticated attackers with complete system compromise (RCE) on a networked device that typically has visibility into physical spaces and network infrastructure. While authentication is required, it is often the weakest link in IoT deployments. The ease of exploitation and the broad operational impact of compromised surveillance infrastructure make this a credible near-term risk, especially in environments using default or shared credentials across multiple devices.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects a HIGH severity rating driven by: (1) Network accessibility with no special network conditions required (AV:N); (2) low attack complexity with no additional privileges or user interaction needed beyond authentication (AC:L, UI:N); (3) requirement for valid user credentials, which reduces base severity but is common in IoT environments (PR:L); (4) complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the target device (C:H, I:H, A:H). The scope is unchanged, as compromise is limited to the affected device itself, not the broader system environment.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to be on the network to exploit this?
Yes, the vulnerability is network-accessible, but you must have valid authentication credentials to the camera's web interface. You do not need to be on the same local network segment if the camera is accessible over the internet or through a VPN, but you do need legitimate login credentials.
What if we have these cameras but don't know what firmware version is running?
Access the camera's web interface and navigate to the system information or settings page—most IP cameras display firmware version there. Alternatively, query the device via HTTP GET requests to information endpoints or check the manufacturer's documentation for your specific model. Audit all instances to ensure none are running 4.8.30.57701411 or verify with the vendor if your version is patched.
Is this vulnerability being actively exploited?
The vulnerability was published on July 1, 2026, and is not currently listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. However, given the simplicity of exploitation and the prevalence of IP cameras in corporate and government networks, proactive patching is strongly recommended rather than waiting for evidence of active exploitation.
Can we just change the camera's password to reduce risk?
Changing passwords is a necessary baseline control, but it does not eliminate the vulnerability itself. An attacker with any valid credential (whether obtained through compromise, weak passwords, or shared accounts) can still exploit this flaw. Patching the firmware is the only definitive mitigation.
This analysis is provided for informational and defensive purposes. Unauthorized access to computer systems is illegal. All remediation recommendations should be tested in non-production environments before deployment. Verify all patch information against official vendor advisories before implementation. This document does not constitute legal advice and does not guarantee complete mitigation of all security risks. Consult with your security team and vendor support for environment-specific guidance. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-10. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-41265HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host OS Command Injection (CVSS 7.2)
- CVE-2025-41266HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2025-41267HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-41279HIGHOS Command Injection in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host Administration WebUI
- CVE-2025-41281HIGHWaterfall WF-500 OS Command Injection
- CVE-2025-66273HIGHQNAP Command Injection in QTS and QuTS hero
- CVE-2025-66279HIGHQNAP NAS Command Injection – Admin Authentication Required, HIGH Severity
- CVE-2025-69755HIGHNeterbit NW-431F Router RCE and Data Exposure Vulnerability