MEDIUM 6.5

CVE-2026-57737: DOM XSS in Phlox Shortcodes Plugin – Patch Now

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme, a WordPress plugin by Averta LTD. The flaw allows authenticated users to inject malicious scripts that execute in other users' browsers when they view affected pages. An attacker with login credentials could craft a malicious shortcode or page element that steals session tokens, performs actions on behalf of administrators, or defaces site content. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 2.17.16.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 6.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-79
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-07-01 / 2026-07-02

NVD description (verbatim)

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Averta LTD Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme allows DOM-Based XSS. This issue affects Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme: from n/a through 2.17.16.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-57737 is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability (CWE-79) in the Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme. The plugin fails to properly neutralize user-controlled input during web page generation, allowing malicious scripts to be injected into the DOM. The vulnerability requires authentication (PR:L in the CVSS vector) and user interaction (UI:R)—specifically, a victim must view a page containing the attacker's payload. The scope is changed (S:C), meaning the impact extends beyond the vulnerable component to affect the broader application and other users. With a CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.5 (Medium), the vulnerability poses a moderate risk in multi-user WordPress environments.

Business impact

For WordPress sites relying on the Phlox theme's shortcode functionality, this vulnerability creates insider risk and supply-chain exposure. Contributors, editors, or any authenticated user below admin level could exploit this to compromise site integrity, harvest administrator credentials, or inject persistent malicious content. In SaaS or agency hosting scenarios serving multiple clients, a single compromised account could affect numerous downstream sites. The attack requires no special technical sophistication once credentials are obtained, making it attractive to opportunistic threat actors or disgruntled insiders.

Affected systems

The Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme is affected in all versions through 2.17.16. WordPress installations using this plugin are at risk. The vulnerability is exploitable by any user with authentication credentials (subscriber level or above, depending on plugin configuration), making it a risk even in restricted-contributor scenarios. Sites with guest posting, community forums, or vendor account integrations face higher exposure.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires authentication and user interaction; an attacker cannot remotely trigger the payload without first obtaining valid credentials or social engineering a victim into clicking a malicious link. However, the barrier to entry is relatively low: many WordPress environments distribute editor or contributor credentials broadly. Once inside, crafting a DOM-based XSS payload in a shortcode parameter requires moderate technical knowledge but is not complex. No zero-day toolkit is necessary. The medium CVSS score reflects this balance: real-world exploitability is credible but constrained by the authentication requirement.

Remediation

Update the Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme to the latest patched version beyond 2.17.16. Averta LTD has released fixes; consult the vendor advisory for exact version numbers. Interim mitigations include restricting shortcode usage via user roles (disable shortcode editing for untrusted users), auditing active user accounts, and monitoring for suspicious shortcode modifications in post history. Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules can detect and block inline script injection patterns in plugin parameters.

Patch guidance

Visit the official Averta LTD repository or WordPress.org plugin page for the Phlox theme shortcodes extension. Verify the current version in your WordPress dashboard (Plugins → Installed Plugins) and compare against the vendor's release notes. Apply the patch during a maintenance window; test on staging first to ensure no shortcode compatibility regressions. If auto-updates are not enabled, enable them or schedule a manual update promptly. Document the patch date and version for compliance records.

Detection guidance

Monitor WordPress post and page revision history for unexpected shortcode modifications, particularly by lower-privileged accounts. Check web server logs and WordPress audit logs (via security plugins like Wordfence or Sucuri) for POST requests containing unusual special characters or script tags in shortcode parameters. Hunt for DOM XSS indicators: script tags, event handlers (onclick, onerror), or HTML entity encoding anomalies in plugin settings and post metadata. Correlate any shortcode changes with concurrent logins from unusual IPs or user-agents.

Why prioritize this

While the CVSS score of 6.5 is medium, the actual priority is elevated by context: (1) WordPress is ubiquitous in web deployments; (2) the plugin extends core functionality, making it widely trusted; (3) authentication requirement does not eliminate risk in multi-user environments, which are common; (4) XSS on site admin panels directly threatens site takeover. Organizations with weak credential hygiene or shared editor accounts should treat this as high priority.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 3.1 score of 6.5 (Medium) reflects: Attack Vector Network (AV:N) — remotely exploitable via web; Access Complexity Low (AC:L) — no special conditions needed; Privileges Required Low (PR:L) — authenticated user; User Interaction Required (UI:R) — victim must view the page; Scope Changed (S:C) — affects other components/users; Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability all Impacted (C:L, I:L, A:L) — data theft, content modification, and potential service disruption are all possible. The score is medium rather than high because authentication is mandatory and user interaction is needed, but the scope change and multi-impact nature prevent a lower rating.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need admin credentials to exploit this, or can a contributor trigger it?

Any authenticated user can potentially exploit this, depending on how the plugin restricts shortcode creation. In the default WordPress configuration, Contributors cannot add new posts, but Editors and Authors can. If your site permits lower-privilege users to edit posts with shortcodes, they are potential attack vectors. Audit your user roles and capabilities immediately.

Is this vulnerability actively exploited in the wild?

CVE-2026-57737 is not listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating no confirmed public exploitation at the time of publishing. However, the simplicity of DOM-based XSS and the widespread use of WordPress shortcodes make it a likely target for future attack development. Do not delay patching based on lack of current KEV status.

What if I cannot update immediately—what should I do?

Immediately restrict shortcode editing via user role management: remove the 'edit_posts' capability for Contributors and Editors until you patch. Disable the plugin entirely if it is not critical to operations. Enable a WAF rule to block requests containing script tags or suspicious entities in plugin parameter strings. Monitor logs aggressively for any anomalies in post history or user login patterns.

Will a WordPress security plugin like Wordfence catch this attack?

Some security plugins offer post-revision monitoring and malicious code detection. Wordfence, Sucuri, and similar tools can alert on suspicious post modifications or script injection attempts, but they are not a substitute for patching. Use them as an early warning layer, not as a remediation strategy.

This analysis is based on publicly disclosed information as of the publication date. Affected product version numbers and patch details should be verified against the official Averta LTD vendor advisory before deployment. SEC.co does not provide exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept instructions. Organizations should test patches in a non-production environment before rollout. This vulnerability analysis does not constitute legal advice or guarantee of security; consult your security operations team and vendor documentation for your specific environment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-10. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).