MEDIUM 5.4

CVE-2019-25739: GigToDo 1.3 Stored XSS Vulnerability in Proposal Descriptions

GigToDo version 1.3 is vulnerable to a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack. An authenticated user can inject malicious JavaScript or HTML code into a proposal description field. When other users—particularly administrators—view that proposal, the attacker's code executes in their browser, potentially stealing session cookies or redirecting them to malicious sites. The vulnerability requires an attacker to already have valid login credentials, but the impact affects anyone who later views the compromised proposal.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 5.4 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-79
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-04 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

GigToDo 1.3 contains a persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript and HTML code through the proposal description field. Attackers can craft XSS payloads in the create_proposal endpoint that execute when administrators or other users view the stored proposal, enabling cookie theft and malicious redirects.

4 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2019-25739 is a stored XSS vulnerability in GigToDo 1.3's proposal creation endpoint. The vulnerability exists because user input in the proposal description field is not properly sanitized or encoded before being stored in the application database. When proposals are retrieved and rendered in the user interface, the malicious payload executes within the security context of the victim's browser session. The attack vector is network-based with low complexity; it requires prior authentication and user interaction (viewing the proposal) to trigger. This classifies as a CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) issue.

Business impact

Organizations running GigToDo 1.3 face risks of unauthorized access to administrative accounts and sensitive user data. If an attacker compromises an admin's session through cookie theft, they could modify or delete proposals, access customer information, or perform unauthorized actions within the system. Malicious redirects could damage user trust and potentially facilitate phishing attacks targeting your workforce. The practical impact depends on proposal visibility and who typically reviews them, but administrative users are at elevated risk.

Affected systems

GigToDo version 1.3 is affected. Organizations should verify their GigToDo deployment version immediately. If running version 1.3, assume all proposals created or edited by any authenticated user could contain malicious payloads. Check application logs and proposal modification timestamps to identify when this version was in use and which proposals may have been created during that period.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires valid authentication credentials—an attacker must have a legitimate GigToDo account or have compromised one. The attack has low complexity and no special tools are needed; attackers only need to craft an XSS payload in the proposal description field and wait for other users to view it. However, the requirement for authentication and user interaction (viewing the proposal) limits opportunistic, large-scale exploitation. This is a medium-severity threat most relevant to organizations where user access is provisioned to external contractors or where account security is weak.

Remediation

Upgrade GigToDo to a patched version that properly sanitizes and encodes user input in the proposal description field. Verify the patch version against the vendor's official security advisory. As interim mitigation, restrict who can view proposals to trusted administrators only, and consider implementing Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block common XSS payload patterns in proposal-related requests. Review recent proposal activity and user sessions for signs of compromise.

Patch guidance

Contact GigToDo's vendor or check their security advisory page for the latest patched version. Apply the update to all instances of GigToDo 1.3 in your environment. Test the patch in a non-production environment first to ensure application functionality is not disrupted. After patching, clear browser caches on workstations where GigToDo is accessed to remove any cached malicious content.

Detection guidance

Monitor for unusual XSS payloads in proposal submission logs—look for script tags, event handlers (onerror, onclick), or JavaScript protocol handlers in proposal description fields. Review web server access logs for requests to the create_proposal endpoint from unusual sources or at odd times. Check for suspicious redirects or cookie exfiltration attempts in network traffic or endpoint telemetry. Audit administrator and power-user account activity for unauthorized session usage or access to sensitive proposals they wouldn't normally view.

Why prioritize this

Although rated MEDIUM severity, this vulnerability merits prompt attention because it directly targets administrative users, can lead to session hijacking, and affects data confidentiality and integrity. The stored nature of the XSS means every future viewer of a malicious proposal is at risk. Organizations with strict data protection requirements or those handling sensitive customer information should prioritize patching within their normal maintenance windows.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.4 (MEDIUM) reflects a network-accessible vulnerability requiring authentication and user interaction, with limited scope and impact. The vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N indicates: network attack vector, low attack complexity, low privilege requirement (authenticated user), required user interaction, changed scope (affects resources beyond the vulnerable component), and low impact on confidentiality and integrity with no availability impact. The score appropriately captures the authentication barrier and user interaction requirement, but organizations should not underestimate the risk if GigToDo stores sensitive business data.

Frequently asked questions

Does this vulnerability affect GigToDo versions other than 1.3?

The disclosure specifically identifies GigToDo 1.3 as affected. Organizations running other versions should check vendor advisories or release notes to determine if they are also vulnerable. Do not assume older or newer versions are safe without explicit confirmation from the vendor.

Can this vulnerability be exploited without a valid GigToDo account?

No. The vulnerability requires authentication—the attacker must either possess valid login credentials or have compromised an existing user account. This significantly limits exposure compared to unauthenticated XSS vulnerabilities, but internal threats and credential compromise remain relevant concerns.

What should I do if I suspect my organization was compromised via this vulnerability?

Review proposal modification logs to identify when GigToDo 1.3 was in use and which proposals were created during that period. Check for malicious payloads in proposal descriptions. Audit administrator and user session activity for unauthorized access, particularly around the time of high-privilege actions. Reset passwords for accounts that viewed potentially compromised proposals, especially administrative accounts. Monitor for signs of cookie theft or session hijacking.

Is there a workaround if we cannot patch immediately?

Yes, as interim controls: restrict proposal visibility to a minimal set of trusted users, implement input validation at the WAF or reverse proxy level to block known XSS patterns, disable JavaScript execution in proposal viewing contexts if the application supports it, and increase monitoring of proposal-related endpoints. However, these are not substitutes for patching—schedule an update as soon as possible.

This analysis is based on the CVE record published on 2026-06-04 and modified on 2026-06-17. SEC.co does not independently verify vendor claims or test patches. Always consult the official GigToDo vendor security advisory and release notes before deploying patches. This information is provided for educational and defensive security purposes. Unauthorized access to computer systems is illegal. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).