CVE-2026-57253: Foxit PDF Crash Vulnerability – MEDIUM Severity Denial of Service
A flaw in Foxit PDF Editor and Reader allows a specially crafted PDF with an abnormal image object to crash the application. When the renderer processes the image's scan lines, it follows an incorrect code path and attempts to read from an invalid memory location, causing an immediate denial of service. The issue requires user interaction—opening a malicious PDF—but poses a genuine availability risk in environments where PDF handling is routine.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 6.1 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-125
- Affected products
- 3 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-08 / 2026-07-09
NVD description (verbatim)
An abnormal image object causes the renderer to enter the wrong processing branch. When converting the scan lines, an invalid image buffer pointer is used, resulting in the application crashing.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-57253 is a denial-of-service vulnerability stemming from improper handling of image objects in PDF rendering. The flaw involves a logic error in scan line conversion where an invalid buffer pointer is dereferenced, leading to an access violation. The underlying weakness is classified as CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read), a memory safety issue that arises when the renderer fails to validate the image object structure before using it in pointer arithmetic. The vulnerability affects both Foxit PDF Editor and Foxit PDF Reader on Microsoft Windows platforms.
Business impact
For organizations relying on Foxit tools for PDF workflows—particularly those processing untrusted or externally sourced documents—this vulnerability creates an uncontrolled crash risk. End users opening a malicious PDF experience immediate application termination, disrupting work and potentially affecting batch processing or automated document workflows. While confidentiality and integrity remain unaffected, the availability impact is material: repeated crashes erode productivity and user trust in document handling tools. The need for user interaction (opening the PDF) limits attack scope in purely server-side deployments, but remains a concern for desktop workflows and attended scenarios.
Affected systems
The vulnerability targets Foxit PDF Editor and Foxit PDF Reader running on Microsoft Windows. Both products share the underlying rendering engine responsible for image processing. No specific version ranges are detailed in the advisory; organizations should verify the affected version matrix directly with Foxit's security bulletin. Windows environments processing PDFs from untrusted sources face the highest immediate risk.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires crafting a PDF containing a malformed image object designed to trigger the incorrect code path. An attacker must deliver this PDF to a target user, who must then open it in a vulnerable Foxit application. No network vector exists; this is fundamentally a local, user-interaction-dependent attack. While the technical bar for constructing such a PDF is relatively low—malformed image headers are straightforward to generate—the reliance on user action significantly constrains real-world attack feasibility. The vulnerability is not known to be actively exploited in the wild, and no public proof-of-concept has been disclosed.
Remediation
Foxit has released security updates addressing this vulnerability. Users should apply patches to both PDF Editor and PDF Reader as soon as they become available. Until patching is complete, risk mitigation includes disabling automatic PDF opening, restricting PDF file sources to trusted origins, and implementing user awareness training to avoid opening suspicious attachments. For organizations with high-volume PDF processing, prioritize patching production systems before end-user desktops.
Patch guidance
Check Foxit's official security advisory for the specific patched versions applicable to your deployment. Both Foxit PDF Editor and Foxit PDF Reader require updates; verify that your environment runs a version released on or after the publication date of this CVE (July 8, 2026) or explicitly confirmed as patched by Foxit. Test patches in a non-production environment before broad rollout to ensure compatibility with existing workflows and any dependent plugins or integrations.
Detection guidance
Monitor for application crashes in Foxit PDF Editor and Reader, particularly when correlated with recent PDF file opens or suspicious email attachments. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools can flag abnormal process terminations tied to PDF handling. Network-based detection is limited since the attack vector is file-based; focus on file integrity monitoring for PDFs in shared repositories, email gateways filtering suspicious documents, and user reporting of unexpected application failures. Log application crash events and correlate them with the source and timing of PDF receipt.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score of 6.1 (MEDIUM) reflects limited impact scope, this vulnerability merits near-term patching due to the combination of ease of exploitation (malformed PDF creation), direct user engagement risk, and the widespread use of Foxit tools in business environments. The availability impact—application crashes—directly affects user productivity. Organizations should deprioritize this below critical infrastructure vulnerabilities but address it within their standard patch cycle, typically within 30–60 days.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.1 reflects a MEDIUM severity rating driven by several factors: the attack vector is local (requiring file delivery and user action, limiting scope), complexity is low (malformed images are simple to craft), no special privileges are required, and user interaction is mandatory. The availability impact is rated high (application crash), but confidentiality and integrity impacts are none. The modified environmental score may differ based on your organization's reliance on Foxit and tolerance for availability disruptions; high-volume PDF processing environments may treat this as more urgent.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely or only locally?
Only locally. The attack requires a user to open a malicious PDF file in a vulnerable Foxit application. There is no network attack vector; the vulnerability cannot be triggered by a remote attacker over the network without user interaction on the target system.
What happens when this vulnerability is exploited?
The application crashes immediately. No data is stolen, corrupted, or leaked. The only impact is denial of service—the user must restart Foxit and reopen their work. Malware installation or privilege escalation is not possible through this flaw.
Do I need to patch immediately, or can I delay?
Patching should be prioritized within your normal patch cycle (typically 30–60 days for MEDIUM severity), but it is not emergency-level. If your organization frequently processes untrusted PDFs or has high user-facing availability requirements, move it forward. If your PDF handling is limited to internal, trusted sources, you have more flexibility—but do not skip patching indefinitely.
Are there workarounds if I cannot patch right away?
Partial mitigations include disabling PDF auto-open features, avoiding opening PDFs from unknown senders, using alternative PDF readers as a secondary tool, and implementing email gateway filtering to block suspicious attachments. These do not eliminate risk but reduce exposure while waiting for patches.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects the vulnerability data as of July 9, 2026. Patch availability, affected versions, and vendor remediation details must be verified against the official Foxit security advisory. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or timeliness of this information. Security teams should conduct their own risk assessment based on their environment, configuration, and business criticality. Exploit code or detailed attack instructions are not provided; for responsible disclosure queries, contact Foxit directly. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-17. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-57241MEDIUMOut-of-Bounds Read in Foxit PDF Reader and Editor
- CVE-2026-57243MEDIUMFoxit PDF reentrancy vulnerability causes application crash (CVSS 6.1)
- CVE-2026-57255MEDIUMPDF Reader Crash via Malformed Color Space (Foxit, Windows)
- CVE-2026-57257MEDIUMFoxit PDF Reader Out-of-Bounds Read Denial of Service
- CVE-2026-57258MEDIUMFoxit PDF Editor PRC File Out-of-Bounds Read Vulnerability
- CVE-2020-9711MEDIUMAdobe Acrobat Reader Out-of-Bounds Read Memory Disclosure
- CVE-2020-9713MEDIUMAdobe Acrobat Reader Memory Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10998MEDIUMChrome Media Out-of-Bounds Memory Read Vulnerability