CVE-2020-9711: Adobe Acrobat Reader Out-of-Bounds Read Memory Disclosure
Adobe Acrobat Reader versions 2020.009.20074, 2020.001.30002, 2017.011.30171, 2015.006.30523 and earlier contain a flaw that allows an attacker to read sensitive data from a computer's memory when a user opens a specially crafted PDF file. The vulnerability does not allow attackers to modify files or crash the application, but it does expose information that should remain private. An attacker would need to trick someone into opening a malicious PDF to exploit this issue.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-125
- Affected products
- 8 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-23 / 2026-06-26
NVD description (verbatim)
Acrobat Reader versions 2020.009.20074, 2020.001.30002, 2017.011.30171, 2015.006.30523 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2020-9711 is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability (CWE-125) in Adobe Acrobat Reader that enables unauthorized memory disclosure. The flaw is triggered when the application processes a malformed PDF, causing it to read beyond allocated buffer boundaries. The CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) reflects a local attack vector with no privileges required but mandatory user interaction; the high confidentiality impact is offset by the absence of integrity or availability impact, resulting in a medium severity score of 5.5. The vulnerability affects Acrobat DC and Acrobat Reader DC across Windows and macOS platforms.
Business impact
While the CVSS score of 5.5 is moderate, the confidentiality risk warrants attention in environments handling sensitive documents. An attacker could extract passwords, encryption keys, personal data, or intellectual property embedded in or processed alongside PDFs. For organizations processing financial documents, medical records, or proprietary designs, this vulnerability could facilitate data theft or competitive espionage. The requirement for user interaction somewhat mitigates mass-exploitation risk, but phishing campaigns or watering-hole attacks targeting specific users remain viable threats. Unpatched Acrobat Reader deployments should be considered a data-leakage vector.
Affected systems
The vulnerability affects Adobe Acrobat DC and Acrobat Reader DC on both Windows and macOS. Specific vulnerable versions include 2020.009.20074, 2020.001.30002, 2017.011.30171, 2015.006.30523, and all earlier versions of these product lines. Organizations running legacy Acrobat Reader versions (2015, 2017) are at particular risk if not actively patching. The 2020.x release branch is also vulnerable, indicating the flaw existed for an extended period across multiple release generations.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires minimal attacker sophistication but does depend on user action. The attacker must craft a malicious PDF that triggers the out-of-bounds read when parsed by a vulnerable Acrobat Reader instance. No special system privileges are needed; a local user opening the file is sufficient. However, the attack is not wormable or self-propagating—the attacker must deliver the malicious PDF via email, file sharing, or compromised websites. This vulnerability is not currently tracked in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, suggesting active exploitation in the wild has not been widely documented as of the publication date, though targeted attacks against high-value targets remain plausible.
Remediation
Immediate remediation is to update Acrobat Reader and Acrobat DC to patched versions released by Adobe in response to this CVE. Verify the specific patch version numbers against Adobe's official security advisories, as patched builds should be available for all major release branches. Organizations unable to patch immediately should implement mitigating controls: disable opening PDFs from untrusted sources, use PDF viewers with sandboxing or lower privilege models, and restrict PDF handling to trusted internal workflows. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools can monitor abnormal memory access patterns or suspicious PDF processing activities.
Patch guidance
Consult Adobe's official security advisory for CVE-2020-9711 to identify the precise patched version numbers for your Acrobat Reader or Acrobat DC installation. Updates are typically cumulative and should be applied as soon as feasible. Test patches in a non-production environment first to ensure compatibility with organizational workflows and integrations. Adobe generally provides patches through automatic update mechanisms; verify that automatic updates are enabled or manually trigger updates through the application's Help menu. For managed environments, use endpoint management tools to track patch deployment and ensure no systems remain on vulnerable versions.
Detection guidance
Monitor for PDF files with unusual structures or crafted headers that may trigger out-of-bounds reads in Acrobat Reader. Web proxies and email gateways can implement rules to flag suspicious PDFs (e.g., those with obfuscated content streams or known malicious signatures). On endpoints, watch for Acrobat Reader processes spawning child processes, allocating excessive memory, or displaying crashes followed by recovery—signs of exploitation attempts. Memory forensics tools can detect unauthorized reads from sensitive regions (e.g., process stacks or heap allocations). Network-based detection is limited since the attack is local, but monitoring for delivery of suspicious PDFs via email or downloads provides an upstream detection opportunity.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits prompt patching due to its confidentiality impact and the ubiquity of Acrobat Reader in enterprises. Although the CVSS score is moderate (5.5) and exploitation requires user interaction, the ease of delivery and potential for data theft elevate risk in organizations processing sensitive documents. The absence of active exploitation in KEV does not mean the flaw is harmless—it may simply reflect limited public discovery or targeted attacks not yet documented. Prioritize patching systems in departments handling confidential data (finance, legal, R&D) before general rollout.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.5 (Medium) reflects the balance between high confidentiality impact (unauthorized memory disclosure) and the constraints that limit widespread harm: local attack vector, requirement for user interaction, and absence of integrity or availability damage. A vulnerability allowing arbitrary code execution or system compromise would score higher; however, one enabling silent data leakage to a locally positioned attacker merits serious attention despite the moderate numeric score. Organizations should not dismiss this as 'just medium severity'—confidentiality breaches often inflict greater long-term business damage than service disruptions.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited without user action?
No. An attacker must convince or trick a user into opening a malicious PDF file. The vulnerability cannot be triggered remotely or exploited through network exposure alone. However, phishing emails, compromised websites, or social engineering can be effective delivery vectors.
Will updating Acrobat Reader to the latest version eliminate this risk?
Yes, provided you apply the patched versions released by Adobe for CVE-2020-9711. Check Adobe's security advisory to confirm the patch version numbers for your product line (Acrobat DC, Acrobat Reader DC, or legacy versions). Automatic updates should install patches automatically if enabled.
Is this vulnerability being actively exploited in the wild?
This CVE is not currently listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, suggesting public active exploitation has not been widely documented. However, absence from KEV does not guarantee the flaw is not being exploited in targeted attacks against specific organizations.
What is the difference between this vulnerability and code execution flaws in Acrobat Reader?
This flaw discloses sensitive data from memory but does not allow attackers to execute arbitrary code, modify documents, or crash the system. Code execution vulnerabilities are typically scored higher and pose a more immediate threat; however, data disclosure can be equally damaging to organizations handling confidential information.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes to assist security decision-making and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Patch version numbers and specific vendor guidance must be verified against official Adobe security advisories and vendor documentation before deployment. Testing in non-production environments is recommended prior to enterprise rollout. SEC.co makes no warranties regarding the completeness or accuracy of remediation steps and recommends consulting with your vendor and internal security teams before taking action. Regulatory obligations regarding timely patching should be reviewed independently. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-28. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2020-9713MEDIUMAdobe Acrobat Reader Memory Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-34705MEDIUMAdobe InDesign Out-of-Bounds Memory Read Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-47923MEDIUMAdobe Acrobat Reader Out-of-Bounds Memory Read – Information Disclosure Risk
- CVE-2026-47926MEDIUMAdobe Acrobat Reader Memory Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-47961MEDIUMAdobe Acrobat Reader Out-of-Bounds Memory Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10998MEDIUMChrome Media Out-of-Bounds Memory Read Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-11004MEDIUMChrome ANGLE Out-of-Bounds Read Memory Disclosure
- CVE-2026-11006MEDIUMChrome Out-of-Bounds Read in Dawn Graphics API—Urgent Patch Required