CVE-2026-57231: Podman Environment Variable Exfiltration Vulnerability
Podman, a widely-used container management tool, has a vulnerability that allows a malicious container image to steal sensitive environment variables from the host system where the container runs. By crafting an image with improperly formatted environment variables—particularly using wildcard characters—an attacker can exfiltrate all environment variables accessible to the Podman session, potentially exposing credentials, API keys, and other secrets. The flaw affects versions 1.8.1 through 5.8.4 and is resolved in version 5.8.4 and later, as well as in version 6.0.0 and beyond.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-200, CWE-668
- Affected products
- 2 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-26 / 2026-07-06
NVD description (verbatim)
Podman is a tool for managing OCI containers and pods. From 1.8.1 until 5.8.4, a container image that contains a environment variable with just a key and no value can trick podman into passing that variable from the host into the container. This is made worse by the fact that using an asterisk (*) will cause podman to pass all host variables into the container. So essentially a malicious image can exfiltrate all podman environment variables that are set in the session from where the container is launched. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.8.4 and 6.0.0.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability stems from improper handling of environment variable declarations in container image configurations. Podman fails to validate environment variable syntax when parsing image metadata; specifically, it allows variables defined with only a key and no assigned value to pass through to the container runtime without filtering. When combined with wildcard patterns (asterisks), Podman mistakenly expands these to include all host environment variables in the container's execution context. This breaks the container isolation model by allowing container code to access secrets and configuration data from the host Podman session. The issue affects all versions from 1.8.1 up to and including 5.8.4; version 5.8.4, 6.0.0, and later include fixes that properly validate and restrict environment variable propagation.
Business impact
Organizations running container workloads with Podman face confidentiality risk if they use image sources that are not fully trusted or if their supply chain includes third-party images. Exposure of environment variables could leak database credentials, API tokens, cloud authentication keys, or other sensitive configuration, leading to unauthorized access to backend systems. The severity is heightened in scenarios where Podman runs with elevated privileges or where host environment variables contain secrets used by CI/CD pipelines, orchestration systems, or application deployments. Incident response teams should assume that any malicious or compromised container image run on vulnerable Podman instances could have exfiltrated sensitive host data.
Affected systems
Podman versions 1.8.1 through 5.8.3 are vulnerable. The fix is available in version 5.8.4, version 6.0.0, and all subsequent releases. Any system running Podman within the affected range is at risk if it executes container images, whether pulled from public registries, private repositories, or built in-house. This includes Podman running on Linux hosts in development, testing, staging, or production environments, as well as Podman Desktop installations used by developers.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires that a user run a maliciously crafted container image. The attack does not require network access to the Podman daemon (AV:N in the CVSS vector reflects that the vulnerability can be triggered remotely by delivering a poisoned image), does not require special authentication, and does not require user interaction beyond the act of running the container. The barrier to exploitation is relatively low: an attacker need only ensure that their malicious image is used, whether through a compromised public registry entry, a supply-chain insertion, or a targeted deployment scenario. Once the image runs, environment variable exfiltration is automatic and does not require additional exploitation steps.
Remediation
Organizations should immediately upgrade Podman to version 5.8.4 or later, or to version 6.0.0 and beyond. For systems unable to upgrade immediately, the primary mitigation is to avoid running container images from untrusted sources and to implement strict image scanning and signature verification workflows. Where feasible, restrict the environment variables available to the Podman session itself by running Podman under a dedicated user or service account with minimal environment exposure. Additionally, audit logs of running containers and any unusual data exfiltration patterns should be reviewed.
Patch guidance
1. Identify all systems running Podman and determine their current version (run 'podman --version'). 2. Prioritize systems that execute workloads from external or less-vetted image sources. 3. Plan an upgrade to version 5.8.4 or version 6.0.0 or later. For users on the 5.x branch, upgrade to 5.8.4 or newer; for users on the 6.x branch, ensure they are on 6.0.0 or later. 4. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first to ensure compatibility with existing workflows. 5. Coordinate the upgrade with container orchestration tools (Kubernetes, systemd, etc.) if applicable. 6. After patching, verify the fix by confirming the new Podman version is running.
Detection guidance
Detection of exploitation is challenging because the attack occurs during normal container image execution. Organizations should implement the following: 1. Image scanning: Use tools like Trivy, Grype, or Snyk to scan container images for known malicious patterns or suspicious Dockerfile entries related to environment variable wildcards. 2. Behavioral monitoring: Log all Podman container executions, including the image source and any environment variables passed at runtime. Monitor for unexpected exfiltration of environment data. 3. Runtime security: Deploy container runtime security tools (Falco, Sysdig) to detect anomalous process execution or file access within containers that may indicate information gathering. 4. Audit logs: Enable and review Podman audit logs for any unexpected variable injection or container configuration changes. 5. Supply-chain verification: Implement image signing and verification to ensure only trusted images are executed.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability scores HIGH (CVSS 7.5) due to high confidentiality impact and ease of exploitation. The flaw affects a foundational container management tool and can result in wholesale exfiltration of sensitive credentials without any action required from the container operator beyond running a poisoned image. Given the central role Podman plays in modern containerized workflows and the prevalence of image consumption from diverse sources, this poses a material risk to any organization using vulnerable versions. The lack of authentication or user interaction requirements, combined with network-accessible exploitation surface, elevates urgency.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (HIGH): Attack Vector: Network (AV:N) – the vulnerability can be triggered by running a remotely-delivered image. Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L) – no special conditions are required; any user running the image triggers the flaw. Privileges Required: None (PR:N) – no elevated access to Podman is needed. User Interaction: None (UI:N) – the container runs as intended without prompting or warnings. Scope: Unchanged (S:U) – the impact is confined to the system running Podman. Confidentiality: High (C:H) – full disclosure of environment variables accessible to the Podman session. Integrity: None (I:N) – the vulnerability does not allow modification of data. Availability: None (A:N) – there is no denial-of-service vector. The score appropriately reflects a serious confidentiality leak with low barriers to exploitation.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited if I only run images from my own trusted registry?
The risk is significantly reduced if you exclusively run images built and signed by your organization. However, if your build process sources base images or dependencies from public registries without verification, or if you have a large number of developers with write access, the attack surface remains. Implement image scanning and signature verification as defense-in-depth even for internal images.
Does this affect Podman Desktop users?
Yes. Podman Desktop bundles Podman and is subject to the same vulnerability. Developers using Podman Desktop to run container images are at risk if they execute untrusted images. Update Podman Desktop to a version that includes the patched Podman (5.8.4, 6.0.0, or later).
What environment variables are at greatest risk?
Any environment variable set in the shell session from which Podman is launched could be exfiltrated, including: cloud provider credentials (AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID, AZURE_CLIENT_ID), API tokens, database passwords, SSH keys passed as variables, CI/CD secrets, and custom application configuration. Review your Podman execution contexts and minimize the number of sensitive variables present in the shell environment.
Is there a way to detect if a container image is malicious before running it?
No single tool provides 100% certainty, but you can reduce risk by: scanning images with vulnerability scanners (Trivy, Grype); reviewing the Dockerfile and image layers for suspicious environment variable patterns (especially wildcards or empty-value declarations); verifying image provenance and signatures; and running images in isolated sandbox environments first. These measures should be part of your standard image intake process.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes. All version numbers, dates, and CVSS scores referenced are based on official CVE and vendor data current as of the publication date. Organizations should verify patch availability and compatibility with their specific Podman deployment and consult official Podman project documentation and security advisories before applying patches. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or timeliness of this analysis. Always test patches in non-production environments before deployment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-05. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-14611MEDIUMDeepMyst Mysti Authentication Information Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-63579HIGHKyocera TASKalfa Printer Authentication Bypass & Credential Extraction
- CVE-2025-69755HIGHNeterbit NW-431F Router RCE and Data Exposure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0411HIGHNETGEAR Orbi Admin Takeover via Information Disclosure
- CVE-2026-10055HIGHEclipse Theia SSRF Vulnerability in /services/request-service
- CVE-2026-14161HIGHAdvantech Hospital Queuing Management API Documentation Exposure
- CVE-2026-24451HIGHGitea Fork Sync Bypasses Private Repository Access Controls
- CVE-2026-36611HIGHMercusys AC12G Memory Disclosure Vulnerability