CVE-2026-5416: Managed Ethernet Switch Command Injection (CVSS 8.8)
A command injection vulnerability exists in Managed Ethernet Switch devices that allows an authenticated attacker with low-level privileges to inject malicious commands through an improperly validated name parameter. An attacker exploiting this flaw can execute arbitrary system commands and achieve complete control over the affected device. The vulnerability requires valid login credentials to trigger, but does not require user interaction once authenticated.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-78
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-16 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Due to the improper neutralization of special elements used in a name parameter a low privileged remote attacker can exploit a command injection vulnerability in the Managed Ethernet Switch, resulting in full system compromise.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
This vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation in the name parameter handling of a Managed Ethernet Switch. The application fails to properly neutralize special shell metacharacters before passing user-supplied input to system command execution functions. An attacker with low-privileged remote access can construct a specially crafted name parameter containing shell metacharacters (such as pipes, semicolons, or command substitution syntax) to break out of the intended command context and execute arbitrary OS commands with the privileges of the switch process. The CWE-78 classification confirms this as a classic OS command injection flaw.
Business impact
Compromise of a Managed Ethernet Switch can severely disrupt network infrastructure. An attacker gaining full system control could reconfigure switch ports, modify VLAN settings, intercept or redirect traffic, install persistent backdoors, or disable network connectivity for dependent systems. In production environments managing critical data flows, this translates to potential data theft, service outages, and loss of network segmentation. The requirement for authentication reduces opportunistic attack surface, but compromised low-privileged accounts or shared credentials create realistic exploitation pathways.
Affected systems
Managed Ethernet Switch devices are affected. The source data does not specify vendor names or product versions, so you must consult the official vendor security advisory and product documentation to identify which switch models and firmware versions are vulnerable. Check your inventory of Managed Ethernet Switches against the vendor's CVE-specific guidance to determine which devices require patching.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires valid authentication credentials (low-privilege account access), which reduces the attack surface compared to unauthenticated vulnerabilities. However, the attack vector is network-based and requires no user interaction—an attacker with credentials can trigger the flaw remotely by submitting a malicious name parameter. The low complexity of the attack (no special conditions required beyond authentication) and high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability make this a practical threat in environments where account compromise or credential sharing is a risk.
Remediation
Vendors must release patched firmware versions that implement proper input validation and sanitization of the name parameter. The fix should either whitelist acceptable characters (preferred) or escape dangerous metacharacters before passing input to command execution APIs. Organizations should apply vendor-supplied patches as soon as they become available. Temporary mitigations include restricting administrative access to Managed Ethernet Switches, enforcing strong authentication policies, monitoring for suspicious command execution patterns, and logically isolating switch management interfaces.
Patch guidance
Contact your Managed Ethernet Switch vendor directly for patch availability and release notes. Verify the patch addresses CVE-2026-5416 and perform testing in a non-production environment before deployment. Schedule patching during maintenance windows to minimize network disruption. Confirm that all switch models in your environment have corresponding patches available before committing to a remediation timeline.
Detection guidance
Monitor Managed Ethernet Switch logs and command histories for unusual or unexpected commands executed through the device's management interface. Look for name parameter inputs containing shell metacharacters, command substitution patterns (backticks, $() syntax), or other indicators of command injection attempts. Network-based detection is challenging; focus on access controls and authenticated session logging. Consider implementing configuration baselines to detect unauthorized changes to switch settings that may indicate successful exploitation.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits rapid remediation due to its HIGH severity score (8.8), full system compromise potential, and direct impact on network infrastructure integrity. Although authentication is required, the low barrier to exploitation and consequences of switch compromise warrant prioritization above many other vulnerabilities. If Managed Ethernet Switches operate in critical network paths or manage sensitive data flows, move this to the top of your patching queue.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects a network-accessible vulnerability requiring low privilege but no user interaction, combined with high impact across all three security dimensions: confidentiality (attacker reads switch configuration and traffic), integrity (attacker modifies settings and injects commands), and availability (attacker can disable the switch). The score would be higher (critical) if unauthenticated exploitation were possible, but the authentication requirement appropriately reduces severity from maximum. Organizations with mature access controls may accept lower risk; those with weaker credential hygiene face higher practical risk.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited without valid credentials?
No. The vulnerability requires authentication as a low-privileged user account. An attacker must first obtain valid credentials through credential theft, social engineering, or account compromise. This does not eliminate the risk, especially in environments with shared service accounts or weak password practices.
What is the difference between this vulnerability requiring 'low privilege' versus 'high privilege' access?
Low privilege means the attacker's account has minimal rights on the system—perhaps read-only or basic user permissions. The vulnerability allows that low-privilege account to escalate to full system control. High-privilege access would mean the attacker already has administrator rights, making the vulnerability less critical as a standalone issue.
Is this vulnerability actively exploited in the wild?
The source data does not indicate this vulnerability has been added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, which tracks vulnerabilities with confirmed active exploitation. However, this does not guarantee it is not being exploited; it may simply not yet have been observed or reported to CISA. Treat it as a high-priority patching target regardless.
What should I do if my organization cannot patch immediately?
Implement compensating controls: restrict network access to switch management interfaces, enforce multi-factor authentication for administrative accounts, regularly audit who has switch access, monitor for suspicious command execution, and increase logging verbosity. These measures reduce attack surface while you coordinate with the vendor and plan patching.
This analysis is provided for informational and defensive security purposes. The vulnerability details come from published CVE data and industry standards. Vendor information and patch availability must be verified directly with the manufacturer. This intelligence does not constitute a guarantee of vulnerability presence in your environment—conduct your own asset discovery and testing. Do not use this information to develop, test, or deploy exploits against systems you do not own or have explicit permission to test. Consult your organization's security policy and legal team before initiating remediation activities. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-24. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-41265HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host OS Command Injection (CVSS 7.2)
- CVE-2025-41266HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2025-41267HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-41279HIGHOS Command Injection in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host Administration WebUI
- CVE-2025-41281HIGHWaterfall WF-500 OS Command Injection
- CVE-2025-66273HIGHQNAP Command Injection in QTS and QuTS hero
- CVE-2025-66279HIGHQNAP NAS Command Injection – Admin Authentication Required, HIGH Severity
- CVE-2025-69755HIGHNeterbit NW-431F Router RCE and Data Exposure Vulnerability