CVE-2026-53084: Linux Kernel BPF Task VMA Iterator Lock Ordering Denial of Service
A lock ordering vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel's BPF (Berkeley Packet Filter) task virtual memory area (VMA) iterator. The issue occurs when the kernel holds a per-VMA lock while executing a BPF program, which can lead to a circular lock dependency when BPF helper functions try to acquire locks that depend on the memory map lock. This can cause system deadlocks or denial of service. The fix snapshots the VMA data structure while holding the lock, then releases the lock before the BPF program executes, eliminating the circular dependency. The vulnerability requires local access and does not allow privilege escalation or information disclosure.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- —
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-24 / 2026-07-23
NVD description (verbatim)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: return VMA snapshot from task_vma iterator Holding the per-VMA lock across the BPF program body creates a lock ordering problem when helpers acquire locks that depend on mmap_lock: vm_lock -> i_rwsem -> mmap_lock -> vm_lock Snapshot the VMA under the per-VMA lock in _next() via memcpy(), then drop the lock before returning. The BPF program accesses only the snapshot. The verifier only trusts vm_mm and vm_file pointers (see BTF_TYPE_SAFE_TRUSTED_OR_NULL in verifier.c). vm_file is reference- counted with get_file() under the lock and released via fput() on the next iteration or in _destroy(). vm_mm is already correct because lock_vma_under_rcu() verifies vma->vm_mm == mm. All other pointers are left as-is by memcpy() since the verifier treats them as untrusted.
4 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability stems from a lock ordering issue in the BPF task_vma iterator implementation. When iterating over VMAs, the kernel acquires a per-VMA lock and holds it across the BPF program body. This creates a problematic lock chain: vm_lock → i_rwsem → mmap_lock → vm_lock, forming a cycle. The resolution involves taking a memory snapshot of the VMA structure (via memcpy) while holding the per-VMA lock, then releasing the lock before returning control to the BPF program. The BPF program then operates only on this immutable snapshot. The verifier has been updated to trust only vm_mm and vm_file pointers within snapshots; vm_file is properly reference-counted with get_file() and released via fput(), while vm_mm correctness is ensured by prior RCU lock verification. All other pointers are treated as untrusted.
Business impact
This vulnerability primarily affects systems running BPF-based monitoring, tracing, or container orchestration tools that query process memory maps. An unprivileged local attacker could trigger a deadlock condition, causing the system to become unresponsive or experience severe performance degradation. This impacts availability of services that depend on kernel stability, particularly those using eBPF for observability or security monitoring. The attack requires local access and unprivileged execution, limiting exposure in hardened or restricted-access environments.
Affected systems
The Linux kernel is affected. The vulnerability applies to systems with BPF enabled and actively using the task_vma iterator. This includes modern cloud infrastructure (Kubernetes nodes, container hosts), systems running monitoring agents using eBPF (Falco, Cilium, bcc tools), and development machines with BPF tooling. Embedded systems, IoT devices, and specialized appliances with minimal BPF usage are at lower risk. The vulnerability requires an unprivileged local user account.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires local access and unprivileged user privileges. An attacker would craft a BPF program that invokes helper functions with lock dependencies that trigger the circular lock condition, causing a denial of service. No memory corruption, privilege escalation, or remote code execution is possible. The CVSS score of 5.5 (MEDIUM) reflects the local requirement and denial of service impact without authentication bypass. The attack is reliable once the lock cycle is triggered, making it a moderate concern for multi-tenant systems.
Remediation
The fix is to update to a patched Linux kernel version that implements VMA snapshotting in the task_vma iterator. Verify the specific kernel version containing this fix against your vendor's advisory (Red Hat, Ubuntu, etc. maintain their own backport schedules). Organizations unable to patch immediately should restrict unprivileged BPF access using CAP_SYS_ADMIN restrictions or disable BPF functionality if not required. Monitor for unauthorized or unusual BPF program loading attempts.
Patch guidance
Obtain and test the patched Linux kernel version from your distribution vendor. The upstream fix is available in the Linux kernel source repository with the commit addressing BPF task_vma iterator locking. Coordinate patching with your infrastructure team to minimize downtime. Prioritize systems running BPF-based observability tools or those in multi-tenant environments. Verify patch application by confirming kernel version and testing BPF task iteration workloads post-update.
Detection guidance
Monitor system logs for signs of kernel deadlock, including hung task warnings, RCU stall detector messages, or soft lockup warnings coinciding with BPF program loading or execution. Track BPF program loads and hook points using audit logs or seccomp monitoring. In environments using BPF monitoring tools (Falco, Cilium), watch for tool hangs or crashes during normal operation. Test detection by deliberately loading BPF programs on patched vs. unpatched systems and observing kernel behavior. Alert on repeated kernel task hangs or system recovery from deadlock conditions.
Why prioritize this
While this vulnerability scores MEDIUM and does not enable privilege escalation or remote attacks, it directly impacts system availability in production environments running BPF-dependent infrastructure. Kubernetes clusters, container platforms, and systems running observability tools face heightened risk. The ease of triggering a local denial of service, combined with widespread adoption of eBPF for monitoring, justifies prompt patching in affected deployments.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 5.5 reflects a denial of service vulnerability accessible to unprivileged local users with no additional complexity. The attack vector is local, privileges required are low, user interaction is none, scope is unchanged, and the impact is high availability loss with no impact to confidentiality or integrity. This score appropriately reflects the serious but contained nature of the threat.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely?
No. The vulnerability requires local user access to load and execute a malicious BPF program. Remote attackers cannot exploit this without first obtaining local code execution privileges.
Will this cause data loss?
No. The vulnerability triggers a denial of service (system deadlock) but does not corrupt data, leak information, or enable file system tampering. Data integrity is not affected.
How does the snapshot approach prevent the lock ordering problem?
By releasing the per-VMA lock before the BPF program runs, the kernel eliminates the chain of dependencies that creates the circular lock condition. The BPF program operates on a static snapshot, so it cannot acquire locks that would re-acquire the vm_lock.
Do all Linux systems need to be patched?
Only systems with BPF enabled and allowing unprivileged BPF program loading are at risk. Embedded systems, appliances, or servers with BPF disabled or restricted to privileged users are unaffected. Verify your kernel configuration and threat model.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal, technical, or professional advice. Verify all patch versions and vendor advisories against official sources before deploying fixes. Test patches in non-production environments first. Organizations should assess their specific kernel configurations, BPF usage, and threat models when prioritizing remediation. No exploit code or detailed attack steps are provided. Consult your Linux distribution vendor's security advisory for vendor-specific patch schedules and support timelines. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-01. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Affected vendors
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-71313MEDIUMLinux Kernel PCI Endpoint NULL Pointer Dereference
- CVE-2025-71314MEDIUMLinux Panthor GPU Driver Denial of Service via Cache Flush Timeout
- CVE-2025-71315MEDIUMLinux Kernel vkms DRM Vblank Timer Denial of Service
- CVE-2026-0268MEDIUMPrisma Access Agent Linux VPN Bypass Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10004MEDIUMChrome UI Spoofing Vulnerability – Password Dialog Hijacking
- CVE-2026-10018MEDIUMInteger Overflow in Chrome ANGLE GPU Graphics Layer
- CVE-2026-10912MEDIUMChrome Extension Same-Origin Policy Bypass (CVSS 6.5)
- CVE-2026-10916MEDIUMChrome DevTools UXSS Vulnerability