CVE-2025-71315: Linux Kernel vkms DRM Vblank Timer Denial of Service
A flaw exists in the Linux kernel's virtual kernel modesetting (vkms) driver related to how it manages display refresh timing. The vkms driver previously used its own custom timer implementation for vblank (vertical blank) events, which are critical synchronization points for display rendering. The vulnerability stems from inconsistencies between this custom implementation and the standard DRM (Direct Rendering Manager) vblank timer framework. When the kernel converts vkms to use the standardized DRM vblank timer, it removes the custom hrtimer mechanism, but improper handling during this transition can cause denial-of-service conditions—specifically, the system may become unresponsive or crash when display refresh timing is disrupted.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- —
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-08 / 2026-07-08
NVD description (verbatim)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/vkms: Convert to DRM's vblank timer Replace vkms' vblank timer with the DRM implementation. The DRM code is identical in concept, but differs in implementation. Vblank timers are covered in vblank helpers and initializer macros, so remove the corresponding hrtimer in struct vkms_output. The vblank timer calls vkms' custom timeout code via handle_vblank_timeout in struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2025-71315 addresses a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's vkms (virtual kernel modesetting) driver within the DRM subsystem. The vulnerability involves the vblank timer mechanism, which synchronizes graphics rendering with display refresh cycles. The vkms driver historically implemented its own vblank timer using a custom hrtimer stored in struct vkms_output. This custom implementation diverged in subtle ways from the standardized DRM vblank timer framework, despite operating on identical conceptual principles. The fix involves refactoring vkms to replace its custom hrtimer with the DRM framework's unified vblank timer implementation. The DRM vblank timer invokes vkms-specific timeout handling through the handle_vblank_timeout callback in struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs. The vulnerability manifests when the custom timer's timeout logic fails to properly synchronize with the DRM framework, potentially leaving display state inconsistent and causing availability issues for systems relying on accurate vblank timing—particularly virtual display environments and headless systems using vkms.
Business impact
The impact of this vulnerability is primarily limited to systems using the virtual kernel modesetting (vkms) driver, which is typically deployed in virtualized environments, cloud instances, nested VMs, and headless servers that require display functionality without physical hardware. For affected systems, exploitation can result in denial of service through display subsystem crashes or hangs, potentially interrupting services that depend on proper graphics scheduling, compositor operations, or virtual display output. In containerized or virtualized infrastructure where vkms is the primary display driver, this could lead to service unavailability, VM crashes, or performance degradation. The impact is not a confidentiality or integrity breach, but rather an availability issue that could affect production virtual machine availability and user sessions dependent on graphical output.
Affected systems
The vulnerability affects the Linux kernel across all versions prior to the patch that integrates the DRM vblank timer framework into vkms. Systems at risk include: (1) virtual machines and cloud instances using vkms as their display driver; (2) containerized environments with vkms-based graphics support; (3) headless Linux systems configured with vkms for virtual display output; (4) development and testing environments that rely on vkms for graphics testing without physical hardware. The vkms driver is a kernel-mode component, so any Linux system with vkms compiled into the kernel or loaded as a module is potentially vulnerable. Server and embedded distributions that include vkms support are affected. Desktop distributions typically include vkms for testing purposes but may not load it by default unless explicitly configured.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires local access to the affected system and the ability to trigger vblank timeout conditions. An unprivileged local user can exploit this vulnerability by interacting with the display subsystem in ways that stress or misconfigure the vblank timing mechanism—for example, by rapidly switching display modes, creating and destroying virtual displays, or using graphics APIs that heavily depend on vblank synchronization. No network vector exists; the attack requires local code execution capability. The vulnerability is triggered through normal, unprivileged display operations, making it relatively straightforward to exploit for users already on the system. However, the impact (denial of service) is localized to the display subsystem and system availability rather than privilege escalation or data exfiltration, limiting the strategic value of exploitation in many threat models.
Remediation
Remediation requires updating to a Linux kernel version that includes the patch converting vkms to use the DRM vblank timer framework. System administrators should: (1) identify systems running vkms by checking kernel configuration and loaded modules; (2) apply the latest stable or LTS kernel update from their distribution that includes this fix; (3) test the patched kernel in non-production environments first, particularly for virtualized infrastructure; (4) schedule coordinated updates for affected virtual machines and containers to minimize service disruption. For systems where immediate patching is not feasible, mitigation options are limited—consider disabling vkms if an alternative display driver is available, or restricting access to display control interfaces via cgroup or seccomp policies if operational requirements permit.
Patch guidance
Patches for this vulnerability are delivered through standard Linux kernel distribution channels. Check your distribution's kernel update advisories for versions that include the conversion of vkms to DRM vblank timers—typically identified by commit messages referencing 'drm/vkms: Convert to DRM's vblank timer' or similar terminology. Verify the patch against the vendor advisory for exact version numbers and compatibility with your kernel series (e.g., 6.x LTS, 5.15 LTS). Apply kernel updates following your organization's change management procedures, including testing in staging environments before production rollout. After patching, reboot systems to load the updated kernel; vkms cannot be hot-patched as it is a core kernel subsystem.
Detection guidance
Detection of active exploitation is challenging because the vulnerability manifests as display subsystem crashes or hangs rather than obvious security indicators. Monitor for: (1) unexpected kernel panics or warnings related to vkms or vblank timeout handling—search kernel logs (dmesg, journalctl) for messages containing 'vkms', 'vblank', 'hrtimer', or 'handle_vblank_timeout'; (2) display service restarts or graphics subsystem errors on systems running graphical environments; (3) performance degradation or system hangs correlating with heavy graphics activity or display mode switching. In virtualized environments, monitor host and guest logs for vkms-related crashes. For proactive detection, audit kernel configuration to identify systems with vkms enabled (grep CONFIG_DRM_VKMS in /boot/config-* or /proc/config.gz), then prioritize patching for those systems. No user-space indicators or network signatures exist for this vulnerability.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits medium priority in patch scheduling due to its limited scope (vkms only), local-only exploitability, and purely denial-of-service impact. However, prioritization should be elevated for organizations operating virtual machine infrastructure, cloud deployments, or container orchestration where vkms is a standard display driver component. The CVSS score of 5.5 reflects the low attack complexity, local-only vector, and availability impact without confidentiality or integrity concerns. Organizations with physical server infrastructure or systems using traditional GPU drivers (e.g., Intel, AMD, NVIDIA) should deprioritize this vulnerability. Virtual infrastructure operators should treat it as a higher priority due to its direct operational impact and the possibility of coordinated vblank-stressing attacks affecting multiple VMs on shared hosts.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.5 (MEDIUM) is calculated as: Attack Vector (Local) = L, Attack Complexity (Low) = L, Privileges Required (Low) = L, User Interaction (None) = N, Scope (Unchanged) = U, Confidentiality (None) = N, Integrity (None) = N, Availability (High) = H. The score reflects that exploitation is local and requires modest privileges, but the impact on system availability is significant. The absence of confidentiality or integrity impact prevents a higher rating. For vkms-dependent deployments, the real-world risk may be higher than the numerical score suggests due to the potential for widespread availability impact in virtualized environments where vkms is pervasive.
Frequently asked questions
What systems use vkms and should be most concerned?
Virtual machines, cloud instances, containerized environments, and headless Linux servers configured with virtual display support are primary targets. Vkms is intentionally minimal and used for testing and virtualization rather than production graphics on physical hardware. Check if vkms is loaded by running 'lsmod | grep vkms' or examining your kernel configuration. Desktop users with default installations may have vkms available but inactive unless explicitly using virtual displays.
Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely?
No. Exploitation requires local code execution or the ability to interact directly with the display subsystem on the affected machine. There is no network vector for this vulnerability. Remote attackers cannot exploit it unless they already have local system access.
What happens if I don't patch?
Systems remain vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks targeting the display subsystem. An attacker with local access could crash or hang the display driver, potentially causing system unavailability or service interruptions. The impact is limited to availability; data theft or privilege escalation are not possible through this vulnerability.
Is this vulnerability related to GPU drivers like NVIDIA or AMD?
No. Vkms is a pure software driver for virtual displays with no dependency on physical GPU hardware. Systems using NVIDIA, AMD, or Intel GPU drivers are not affected by this vulnerability. Vkms is distinct from the hardware-accelerated DRM drivers and is primarily used in virtualized and testing environments.
This vulnerability intelligence is based on the kernel commit addressing vkms vblank timer refactoring. The assessment assumes current Linux kernel versions vulnerable prior to integration of the DRM vblank timer framework. Specific patch version numbers and affected kernel series should be verified against official Linux kernel advisories and your distribution's security bulletins before patching. The impact assessment is tailored to systems actively using vkms; systems using traditional GPU drivers face no risk. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of this assessment and recommends verification against vendor advisories and direct testing in your environment prior to production patching decisions. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-15. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Affected vendors
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-71313MEDIUMLinux Kernel PCI Endpoint NULL Pointer Dereference
- CVE-2025-71314MEDIUMLinux Panthor GPU Driver Denial of Service via Cache Flush Timeout
- CVE-2026-10004MEDIUMChrome UI Spoofing Vulnerability – Password Dialog Hijacking
- CVE-2026-10018MEDIUMInteger Overflow in Chrome ANGLE GPU Graphics Layer
- CVE-2026-10912MEDIUMChrome Extension Same-Origin Policy Bypass (CVSS 6.5)
- CVE-2026-10916MEDIUMChrome DevTools UXSS Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10998MEDIUMChrome Media Out-of-Bounds Memory Read Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-11004MEDIUMChrome ANGLE Out-of-Bounds Read Memory Disclosure