CVE-2026-50739: Revive Adserver Tracker-Campaign Authorization Bypass
A flaw in Revive Adserver allows low-privileged users to associate their tracking tools with advertising campaigns owned by other managers on the same server. This happens because a security fix applied to one direction of the linking process was not extended to the reverse operation, creating an inconsistency that attackers can exploit. The vulnerability affects Revive Adserver version 6.0.7 and earlier.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.0 · 4.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-284
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-26 / 2026-06-29
NVD description (verbatim)
A bypass for CVE‑2026‑34913 exists with proper ownership validation that had not been applied to the reverse operation of linking campaigns and trackers through the `tracker-campaigns.php` script in Revive Adserver 6.0.7 and earlier. As a result, a low‑privileged user could link their trackers to campaigns owned by other managers on the same instance, leading to inconsistent ownership relationships.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-50739 is an authorization bypass in the `tracker-campaigns.php` script of Revive Adserver. While a prior fix (CVE-2026-34913) implemented ownership validation for one linking direction, the reverse operation—linking trackers to campaigns—was not subjected to equivalent controls. This asymmetric access control allows authenticated users with low privilege levels to create linkages between their trackers and campaigns they do not own, violating the intended ownership model and potentially enabling data manipulation or visibility into other managers' campaign data.
Business impact
Unauthorized tracker-to-campaign associations can lead to data integrity violations, commingling of analytics, and potential exposure of campaign metrics to unauthorized personnel. Multi-tenant or multi-manager deployments are at particular risk, as the vulnerability allows cross-manager access to sensitive campaign tracking relationships. This can undermine audit trails, compromise accuracy of performance reporting, and create compliance risks if campaign data is subject to regulatory controls.
Affected systems
Revive Adserver versions 6.0.7 and earlier are vulnerable. Any deployment with multiple managers or users at different privilege levels who manage separate campaigns and trackers is at risk. The vulnerability requires network access to the affected instance and valid user credentials.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires a valid, low-privileged user account on the Revive Adserver instance. No special network conditions, user interaction, or elevated privileges are required beyond initial authentication. The attack surface is the `tracker-campaigns.php` script, which is part of normal ad server operations. Once exploited, a low-privileged user can persistently link their trackers to any campaign without owner consent or visibility, making this a straightforward privilege escalation scenario.
Remediation
Apply a vendor patch that extends the ownership validation controls already implemented for CVE-2026-34913 to the reverse linking operation in the `tracker-campaigns.php` script. Verify against the official Revive Adserver security advisory that the patched version enforces bidirectional ownership checks. In the interim, restrict access to the `tracker-campaigns.php` endpoint to trusted administrators or disable linking features if operationally feasible.
Patch guidance
Contact Revive Adserver or consult their official security advisory for the patched version that addresses this bypass. The fix should apply consistent authorization logic to both campaign-to-tracker and tracker-to-campaign linking operations. Test patches in a non-production environment before deployment to ensure compatibility with your ad server configuration and dependent integrations.
Detection guidance
Monitor authentication logs and audit trails for low-privileged users accessing the `tracker-campaigns.php` script, particularly for POST or state-changing requests. Track creation or modification of tracker-campaign relationships and flag those where the user making the request does not own either the tracker or the campaign involved. Log anomalies may include unexpected campaign-tracker pairings that do not align with normal operational patterns or manager assignments.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is MEDIUM (4.3), this vulnerability merits prompt attention because it directly undermines data ownership and integrity in a multi-user ad server environment. The fix is likely straightforward—applying existing validation logic symmetrically—yet the impact on audit integrity and cross-manager data isolation is material. Prioritize this above infrastructure vulnerabilities affecting single-user or isolated deployments.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 3.0 score of 4.3 reflects a networked, low-privilege attack requiring valid credentials (PR:L), with no confidentiality impact, limited integrity impact (I:L), and no availability impact (A:N). The score acknowledges that real-world harm depends on deployment topology and manager trust assumptions, but the bidirectional nature of the flaw and ease of exploitation in multi-manager setups elevates practical risk beyond the base score in many organizations.
Frequently asked questions
Is this vulnerability in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog?
No. As of the last update, this vulnerability has not been added to the KEV catalog, meaning it is not yet confirmed to be actively exploited in the wild. However, the relative simplicity of exploitation means monitoring for active abuse is prudent.
Can a user exploit this without prior knowledge of target campaigns?
Potentially. A low-privileged attacker can enumerate campaigns through normal ad server interfaces and then attempt to link their trackers to them. The lack of ownership validation in the reverse operation means they can succeed regardless of whether the campaign is discoverable through normal UI flows.
Does this vulnerability affect single-manager deployments?
Single-manager or single-user deployments have minimal practical risk from this flaw, since there are no competing ownership claims. However, any environment with role-based access control or multiple team members should be treated as vulnerable if the ownership validation gap exists.
What is the relationship to CVE-2026-34913?
CVE-2026-34913 was a related authorization bypass that prompted a fix. CVE-2026-50739 is a bypass of that fix, exploiting the fact that only one direction of the linking operation was protected. Both should be addressed.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects the vulnerability details and CVSS scoring published as of the source date. Security posture varies by deployment, configuration, and environment. Organizations should verify patch availability and compatibility with their vendor before applying any updates. No exploit code or proof-of-concept is provided. Always follow your internal change management and testing protocols before patching production systems. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-04. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-50744MEDIUMRevive Adserver 6.0.7 Admin Bypass via XML-RPC Session Leak
- CVE-2024-27891MEDIUMArista EOS MACsec + Egress ACL Policy Enforcement Failure
- CVE-2025-24165MEDIUMmacOS Permissions Issue Enables Unexpected System Termination
- CVE-2025-24816MEDIUMNokia MantaRay API Authorization Bypass – Information Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-43339MEDIUMmacOS Tahoe Sandbox Access Control Bypass Allows User Data Disclosure
- CVE-2025-46308MEDIUMApple iOS, iPadOS, macOS Authorization Bypass—Sensitive Data Disclosure
- CVE-2026-10152MEDIUMImproper Access Control in TaleLin lin-cms-spring-boot Book Endpoint
- CVE-2026-10172MEDIUMBdtask Multi-Store Inventory 1.0 Unrestricted File Upload Vulnerability