MEDIUM 5.3

CVE-2025-46308: Apple iOS, iPadOS, macOS Authorization Bypass—Sensitive Data Disclosure

Apple has addressed an authorization flaw affecting iOS, iPadOS, and macOS that could allow installed apps to access sensitive user information without proper permission checks. The vulnerability stems from inadequate state management in the platform's authorization framework. While the issue requires a malicious or compromised app to be present on a device, the potential for information disclosure makes this a meaningful security concern for users managing sensitive data. This is not currently known to be exploited in the wild, but the low barrier to exploitation (no user interaction required, network accessible) warrants timely patching.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 5.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-284
Affected products
3 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-11 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4. An app may be able to leak sensitive user information.

2 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2025-46308 is an authorization bypass vulnerability (CWE-284) in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS platforms. The root cause lies in insufficient state management within the authorization subsystem, allowing third-party applications to circumvent permission controls and access sensitive user information. The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 reflects a network-accessible, low-complexity attack that requires no privileges or user interaction but results only in confidentiality impact—integrity and availability are not affected. The vulnerability exists in the trust boundary between the OS kernel and user-space applications, specifically in how the system validates app authorization requests and maintains the state of previously-granted or denied permissions.

Business impact

For organizations with Apple device fleets, this vulnerability poses a data exposure risk, particularly for enterprises managing confidential communications, financial data, or personally identifiable information on iOS and macOS devices. A malicious app distributed through official or unofficial channels could silently harvest sensitive information without triggering user permission prompts. The impact scales with the number of deployed devices and the sensitivity of data accessible through affected apps. Companies relying on Apple's permission model as a security control should treat this as a medium-priority incident response item, especially if they lack Mobile Device Management (MDM) controls to enforce rapid patch deployment.

Affected systems

Vulnerable versions include: iOS prior to 18.4, iPadOS prior to 18.4, and macOS Sequoia prior to 15.4. All three platforms share the underlying authorization architecture affected by this flaw. Any iPhone, iPad, or Mac running older versions is at risk if a compromised or malicious app is installed. Organizations should verify the specific build numbers of deployed devices against Apple's official security release notes to confirm patched status.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires an attacker to deliver a malicious app to a target device—either through app store compromise, sideloading, or user-directed installation of a trojanized legitimate app. No user interaction is required once the app runs. The attack surface is broad (any installed app can attempt to exploit this), but successful exploitation depends on the attacker's ability to distribute or trick users into running their code. Given the CVSS vector (AV:N, AC:L, PR:N, UI:N), the barrier is low once the app is present. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog and has no public exploit code reported as of the published date, suggesting limited real-world weaponization—though absence of reports does not guarantee absence of active exploitation.

Remediation

Users and administrators should immediately apply the security updates: iOS 18.4, iPadOS 18.4, or macOS Sequoia 15.4 or later. Apple has fixed the authorization state management logic in these releases. For organizations using Mobile Device Management, deploy these updates as priority patches. For individual users, enable automatic updates or manually check Settings > General > Software Update (iOS/iPadOS) or System Settings > General > Software Update (macOS). No workaround exists short of patching; reliance on app-level permission grants is insufficient until the OS-level fix is installed.

Patch guidance

Verify your device is running iOS 18.4, iPadOS 18.4, or macOS Sequoia 15.4 (or later minor/maintenance versions of 15.x). Check the full build number in Settings to confirm patch application. For enterprise deployments, use MDM solutions to push these updates to managed devices and generate compliance reports. Prioritize devices used by high-value targets (executives, sensitive departments) and devices with access to cloud-based confidential systems. Test updates in a small pilot group first if your environment requires change control, but treat this as a rapid-deployment scenario due to the authorization bypass nature.

Detection guidance

Monitor for suspicious app behavior using security monitoring tools that can log file system and network access patterns. If EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) tools are deployed on macOS, look for processes attempting to read sensitive files or user defaults outside their declared permissions. On managed iOS/iPadOS devices, enable Mobile Threat Defense (MTD) solutions that can detect apps attempting unauthorized information access. Network-based indicators are minimal; app-level detection via anomalous data exfiltration is the primary signal. Audit your app inventory—remove untrusted third-party apps and any apps that have not been updated by their publisher.

Why prioritize this

This vulnerability merits medium-to-high priority in your patch queue because it affects three major Apple platforms and enables unauthorized access to sensitive user data without user consent. The attack surface is wide (any installed app), the complexity is low (no user interaction), and the impact is direct information disclosure. However, it does not affect system availability or integrity, and there is no evidence of active exploitation. Organizations with sensitive data on Apple devices and those subject to compliance frameworks requiring timely OS patching should prioritize this immediately; others can batch it with regular monthly updates but should not defer beyond the next scheduled maintenance window.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 (Medium) accurately reflects the vulnerability's profile: it has broad attack surface (Network-accessible, no authentication required, low complexity), results in direct confidentiality breach (via information disclosure), and affects the core trust model of iOS/iPadOS/macOS. The score does not escalate to High because there is no integrity compromise, no denial of service, and the attack prerequisite (malicious app installation) requires some attacker effort. The absence of system-wide remote code execution or privilege escalation also constrains the rating. For risk-sensitive environments handling payment card data, health records, or intellectual property, the business risk may exceed the numerical CVSS score; context matters.

Frequently asked questions

Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely without installing an app?

No. Exploitation requires a malicious app to be present on the device. The app itself must be installed (either by the user or through a supply-chain compromise), and then the app leverages the authorization flaw to read sensitive data. The 'AV:N' in the CVSS vector means the vulnerability is reachable over the network in the sense that a network-based malicious app could be the vector, but direct remote exploitation without app installation is not possible.

Does Apple's App Store security review catch this?

Apple's app review process is not specifically designed to detect authorization bypass vulnerabilities in the OS itself; it focuses on app behavior and policy compliance. A benign app could be approved, then later updated to exploit this flaw, or a sophisticated attacker could use a minimal proof-of-concept that passes review. This is why OS-level patching is essential—it removes the underlying vulnerability rather than relying on app vetting alone.

What data can an app access if it exploits this?

The vulnerability allows an app to bypass authorization checks and access sensitive user information. The exact scope depends on what data the app can then read—this may include location history, calendar events, contacts, photos, or data in other apps' sandboxes. Apple's official advisory does not enumerate specific data types, so assume any permission-protected user data is at risk until you have reviewed Apple's full security release notes.

If I'm on an older iOS/iPadOS/macOS version, how urgent is the update?

If your device holds sensitive data (work email, financial accounts, health info), this is urgent—apply within days, not weeks. If the device is lightly used or contains no sensitive information, you have more flexibility, but you should still prioritize it in your next maintenance window. The low barrier to exploitation (no user interaction once an app is running) means a compromised app could silently exfiltrate data on day one.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes and is based on data available as of the publication date (June 2026). Security vulnerabilities and their exploitability evolve; verify all statements against the latest official Apple security advisories and NIST NVD records. No exploit code or step-by-step attack instructions are provided herein. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment and testing before deploying patches to production environments. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or timeliness of this analysis and disclaims liability for decisions made in reliance on it. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-20. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).