CVE-2026-48725: Warp Terminal Clipboard Access Vulnerability
Warp is a terminal development environment that allows developers to work more efficiently with code and terminal commands. A vulnerability in Warp versions from April 2021 through early May 2026 allows malicious terminal output—such as from a compromised remote server or script—to silently read or write data to your system clipboard without asking for permission first. An attacker could craft malicious terminal output that steals sensitive information you've copied (like API keys or passwords) or inject malicious content into your clipboard for you to paste elsewhere. The vulnerability was patched in version 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-276
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-24 / 2026-06-25
NVD description (verbatim)
Warp is an agentic development environment. From 0.2021.04.25.23.05.stable_00 until 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01, Warp allows terminal output to request access to the local system clipboard. A malicious remote host, remote program, or other attacker-controlled terminal output source can trigger clipboard reads or writes without a separate confirmation step. This crosses the trust boundary between untrusted terminal output and the user's local desktop clipboard. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-48725 involves improper clipboard access controls in Warp's terminal rendering layer. The vulnerability stems from terminal output being granted clipboard manipulation capabilities (CLPY escape sequences or similar mechanisms) without requiring explicit user confirmation or security prompts. An attacker controlling remote terminal output can invoke clipboard operations that execute with the same permissions as the Warp process. This violates the security boundary between untrusted data streams (network output, piped commands) and the user's local clipboard, a trusted resource. The issue is classified under CWE-276 (Incorrect Default Permissions), reflecting inadequate default protections on clipboard access. The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.1 (HIGH) reflects network-accessible attack vector, low attack complexity, no privilege requirements, and user interaction limited to normal terminal usage.
Business impact
Organizations using Warp for development face potential compromise of sensitive clipboard-resident credentials, API tokens, and proprietary snippets. Developers may unknowingly paste clipboard content injected by terminal output from untrusted sources, introducing malware or backdoors into codebases or infrastructure. For DevOps teams managing deployment scripts and CI/CD pipelines, compromised clipboard state could lead to configuration tampering or lateral movement. Remote development workflows—accessing terminals via SSH or cloud IDEs—amplify risk because terminal output originates from less-controlled environments. Incident response may require credentialing rotation, codebase review, and forensic analysis of clipboard-adjacent activities.
Affected systems
Warp versions 0.2021.04.25.23.05.stable_00 through 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_00 are vulnerable. Users running any stable release between April 2021 and early May 2026 (prior to the patched version) should update immediately. The vulnerability does not affect other terminal emulators unless they share similar clipboard-access design patterns. Development environments where Warp connects to untrusted or semi-trusted remote hosts pose elevated risk.
Exploitability
Exploitability is moderately high because attack surface is broad. Any untrusted terminal output source—a compromised server, a malicious script, a rogue CI/CD job, or even a public log stream—can trigger the vulnerability without special authentication, elevated privileges, or complex prerequisites. The attacker needs only to craft terminal output containing clipboard-access requests; normal user interaction (such as connecting to a terminal or viewing command output) triggers the condition. However, the vulnerability requires at least one user to run Warp and interact with attacker-controlled terminal output, which adds a minimal user-interaction dependency. No public exploit code or KEV listing currently exists, suggesting real-world exploitation is not yet widespread, but the attack surface and low barrier to weaponization warrant urgent patching.
Remediation
Update Warp to version 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01 or later immediately. The patch restricts clipboard operations triggered by terminal output, likely by requiring explicit user confirmation, sandboxing clipboard access, or disabling clipboard escape sequences entirely. After patching, audit any development workflows that involve untrusted remote terminals or public log analysis. Consider implementing network-level monitoring for unusual clipboard activity or terminal escape sequences if available in your terminal logging infrastructure. For teams managing shared development environments or CI/CD systems, enforce Warp version pinning in deployment manifests to prevent rollback to vulnerable versions.
Patch guidance
Visit the Warp release notes or vendor advisory to confirm the exact version numbering and download path for 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01 or later. Most users can update through Warp's built-in update mechanism; however, air-gapped or managed environments should verify vendor package repositories or signed release artifacts. Test the patched version in a non-production environment first to confirm no breaking changes to terminal escape sequences or scripts that depend on clipboard behavior. Once patched, review Warp's changelog to understand what clipboard access controls were modified, as this may affect terminal integrations or automation scripts.
Detection guidance
Monitor Warp process behavior for unusual file descriptor activity targeting clipboard services or X11/Wayland clipboard management sockets. On Linux systems, audit access to /tmp/.X11-unix or Wayland socket paths. Inspect terminal logs for escape sequences that invoke clipboard operations (e.g., OSC 52 sequences if Warp uses them). Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools should flag suspicious clipboard reads or writes from terminal emulator processes. If possible, compare clipboard content snapshots before and after connecting to untrusted remote terminals to detect injection or exfiltration. Organizations with terminal recording or session replay capabilities should audit historical sessions for clipboard-access patterns.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability should be patched with high urgency (within days, not weeks) because: (1) It requires only network access and user interaction at the terminal, creating broad attack surface; (2) Clipboard compromise is difficult to detect in real time, allowing silent credential or code theft; (3) Affected users are developers and operators who often handle sensitive credentials and code; (4) The five-year window of vulnerable versions suggests widespread deployment; (5) Remote development workflows are increasingly common, multiplying exposure to untrusted terminal output.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.1 (HIGH) reflects: (1) Network-accessible attack vector (AV:N), as any network-accessible terminal source can trigger the vulnerability; (2) Low attack complexity (AC:L), requiring no special techniques or resources; (3) No privilege requirements (PR:N); (4) User interaction required (UI:R), but only normal terminal usage; (5) Confidentiality impact (C:H), as clipboard reads can exfiltrate sensitive data; (6) Integrity impact (I:H), as clipboard writes can inject malicious content; (7) No availability impact (A:N). The HIGH severity is appropriate for a boundary-crossing trust violation affecting a high-value resource (clipboard) on a developer-focused tool.
Frequently asked questions
If I update Warp, will my terminal scripts or clipboard-dependent automations break?
The patch modifies how terminal output interacts with the clipboard, likely restricting or requiring explicit consent for clipboard access. Review the vendor's changelog and test in a non-production environment before rolling out to your team. If you rely on automation that depends on clipboard escape sequences, contact the vendor to understand backward compatibility or alternative approaches.
Can this vulnerability be exploited if I only use Warp to connect to trusted internal servers?
The risk is lower in fully trusted environments, but remote development still introduces some risk—server accounts can be compromised, automation can be injected by other users, and logs may be exposed. Until you patch, treat any terminal output as a potential attack surface. Patching removes the risk regardless of server trust level.
Is clipboard access already being exploited in the wild for this vulnerability?
There is no public exploit code or KEV listing, suggesting real-world exploitation is not yet documented at scale. However, the low barrier to weaponization and broad attack surface mean exploitation could occur at any time. Do not rely on absence of current exploits as a reason to delay patching.
What happens if I'm running Warp in a CI/CD pipeline or container—am I at risk?
Yes. If your CI/CD jobs or containers output untrusted data (third-party logs, user input, external API responses) to the terminal, and a developer runs Warp to view those logs, the vulnerability can be triggered. Patching and restricting clipboard access to untrusted terminal sources in containerized environments is essential.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects the state of information as of the publication date. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the accuracy or completeness of this vulnerability assessment. Consult the vendor's official advisory and release notes for definitive patch details, version numbering, and supported platforms. Testing should be performed in non-production environments before deploying patches. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific Warp deployment, terminal usage patterns, and trust model for remote connections. This advisory does not constitute legal advice or a guarantee of security outcomes. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-02. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-49157HIGHApache ActiveMQ Jolokia Authorization Bypass Allows Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-49237HIGHMultipass macOS Privilege Escalation via Unprotected Auxiliary Binaries
- CVE-2026-11931MEDIUMKiro IDE Authentication Token Cache Exposure (Local Privilege Escalation)
- CVE-2026-12823LOWBrowserbase Skills Permissions Misconfiguration (Local Information Disclosure)
- CVE-2026-48190LOWOTRS Permission Bypass – CMDB CI Data Disclosure
- CVE-2026-48191LOWOTRS STORM Metadata Disclosure via Incorrect Permissions
- CVE-2026-50255MEDIUMOptical Disc Archive Software Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-53870MEDIUMHermes Agent World-Readable Database and HMAC Secret Exposure