CVE-2026-50255: Optical Disc Archive Software Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
Optical Disc Archive Software for Windows versions 5.5.3 and earlier contain a permissions misconfiguration that could allow a local attacker to execute code with SYSTEM-level privileges. An attacker with low-level access to the system would need to interact with the vulnerable component, but once successful, they could gain full system control. This is a local privilege escalation risk rather than a remote network-based threat.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.0 · 6.7 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-276
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-16 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Incorrect default permissions issue exists in Optical Disc Archive Software for Windows 5.5.3 and earlier. If this vulnerability is exploited, arbitrary code may be executed with SYSTEM privileges.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability stems from incorrect default permissions (CWE-276) in Optical Disc Archive Software. The affected software fails to properly restrict access to a protected resource, allowing a user with limited privileges to elevate to SYSTEM context. The attack vector is local, requires existing user-level access, and depends on specific conditions (high attack complexity) plus user interaction. The CVSS 3.0 score of 6.7 reflects the combination of local attack surface, low privilege requirement, and high potential impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Business impact
Compromise of this vulnerability could enable lateral movement within a corporate environment, data exfiltration, malware deployment, or system denial of service. Any organization using Optical Disc Archive Software in archival or backup workflows faces risk of system takeover if users interact with the vulnerable code path. The impact extends beyond the individual machine to any resources accessible from a compromised system with SYSTEM privileges.
Affected systems
Optical Disc Archive Software for Windows version 5.5.3 and earlier versions are affected. Organizations should audit their deployments to confirm installed versions. Verify against the vendor advisory for a complete list of affected minor versions and any platform-specific variants.
Exploitability
This vulnerability requires local system access and user interaction to exploit, which raises the barrier compared to remote, unauthenticated attacks. However, the requirement for SYSTEM privilege execution makes it a high-value target once the code path is triggered. The attack is not currently known to be widely exploited (not on the KEV catalog), but the simplicity of a permissions misconfiguration suggests exploitation tooling could emerge if public details are released.
Remediation
Upgrade Optical Disc Archive Software to a patched version above 5.5.3. Organizations unable to patch immediately should restrict file access permissions to trusted users only, monitor for suspicious SYSTEM-level process creation, and consider disabling the software if it is not critical to operations. Verify the exact patched version against the vendor's official security advisory before deployment.
Patch guidance
Contact the software vendor for available patches or check their security advisories page for version 5.5.4 or later. Apply patches in a controlled test environment first to ensure compatibility with backup and archival workflows. After patching, verify that permissions are correctly applied by auditing the installation directory and any associated registry keys or service accounts.
Detection guidance
Monitor Windows event logs for unexpected SYSTEM privilege processes spawned from the Optical Disc Archive Software installation directory. Track file access to the software's protected resources from standard user accounts. Network defenders should baseline normal execution patterns and alert on deviations. File integrity monitoring on the software's binaries and configuration files can detect unauthorized modification attempts that might exploit the permissions flaw.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score of 6.7 is medium, this vulnerability warrants prioritization because: (1) successful exploitation grants full SYSTEM privileges, enabling lateral movement and data theft; (2) it affects a software category (archival/backup) often trusted with sensitive data; (3) the local + user-interaction requirement is common in enterprise environments where multiple users access archive systems. Organizations running this software should treat patching as moderately urgent rather than deferring to long-term cycles.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.0 score of 6.7 (MEDIUM) reflects: local attack vector (not remote), low privilege requirement (existing user account needed), high attack complexity (specific conditions and user interaction required), and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability once exploited. The score appropriately captures that while initial access is limited to local users, the severity of SYSTEM privilege escalation is substantial. This is not a critical score because the barriers to exploitation (local access + user interaction) prevent worm-like propagation.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to patch immediately if we use Optical Disc Archive Software?
Prioritize patching within 30 days, especially if the software runs on shared systems or processes sensitive data. If the software is isolated to dedicated backup infrastructure with restricted user access, you have some flexibility, but patching should still be completed in the next maintenance cycle.
What does 'incorrect default permissions' mean in this context?
The software likely installs or creates files with overly permissive access controls, allowing standard users to read or modify components that should only be accessible to administrators or the system account. This gives attackers a foothold to exploit and escalate privileges.
Is this vulnerability being actively exploited?
This vulnerability is not currently listed on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating no widespread active exploitation has been publicly documented. However, the relative simplicity of permissions misconfigurations means threat actors may develop exploits once awareness increases.
Can this be exploited over the network?
No. The attack vector is strictly local, meaning an attacker must have some form of interactive access to the affected machine. Remote code execution is not possible through this vulnerability alone.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes. Security decisions should be informed by your organization's risk tolerance, asset criticality, and threat landscape. Always verify patch availability and compatibility through the official vendor advisory before deployment. This vulnerability requires local system access and user interaction; it is not a remote code execution vector. Consult with your vendor and internal teams to determine the appropriate patching timeline for your environment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-24. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-11931MEDIUMKiro IDE Authentication Token Cache Exposure (Local Privilege Escalation)
- CVE-2026-48190LOWOTRS Permission Bypass – CMDB CI Data Disclosure
- CVE-2026-48191LOWOTRS STORM Metadata Disclosure via Incorrect Permissions
- CVE-2026-49157HIGHApache ActiveMQ Jolokia Authorization Bypass Allows Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-49237HIGHMultipass macOS Privilege Escalation via Unprotected Auxiliary Binaries
- CVE-2016-20064MEDIUMWP Vault 0.8.6.6 Arbitrary File Read via Directory Traversal
- CVE-2016-20067MEDIUMWordPress CP Polls CSRF Vulnerability
- CVE-2016-20070MEDIUMPrivilege Escalation & Stored XSS in WordPress Booking Calendar Contact Form 1.0.23