CVE-2026-48703: Warp Agent Code Search Command Injection Vulnerability
Warp, a development environment designed to support agent-assisted coding workflows, contains a critical gap in its command execution controls. The Grep and FileGlob search tools—which appear to users as read-only operations—actually construct and run shell commands built from untrusted input provided by the agent. An attacker or compromised agent instance could exploit this to execute arbitrary commands within the user's terminal session, effectively bypassing intended security boundaries. The flaw affects Warp versions from April 2025 through May 2026 and is resolved in version 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-78
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-24 / 2026-06-25
NVD description (verbatim)
Warp is an agentic development environment. From 0.2025.04.09.08.11.stable_00 until 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01, Warp contains a command execution policy bypass in Agent code search tools. The affected Grep and FileGlob actions are authorized as read/search operations, but their implementations build shell command strings from Agent-controlled inputs (search text, paths, glob patterns) and execute them in the active terminal session. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-48703 exploits a command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) in Warp's Agent code search framework. The Grep and FileGlob actions are implemented as authorized read/search operations; however, their underlying code constructs shell command strings by concatenating Agent-controlled parameters—including search text, file paths, and glob patterns—without proper escaping or parameterization before passing them to the active terminal session. This design flaw allows an agent to inject arbitrary shell metacharacters and commands. The vulnerability requires local access and user interaction to trigger (Warp must be running with an active terminal session), but once triggered, execution occurs with the privileges of the user running Warp. Versions 0.2025.04.09.08.11.stable_00 through 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_00 are affected; the fix shipped in 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01.
Business impact
Development teams relying on Warp's agent capabilities face a significant insider threat and supply-chain risk vector. If an agent backend is compromised or acts maliciously, it can silently execute code on developer machines—exfiltrating source code, stealing credentials, installing backdoors, or pivoting to other systems on the network. The impact extends beyond individual developers: engineering workstations often have access to repositories, build systems, and internal infrastructure, making them high-value targets. Organizations using Warp in CI/CD pipelines or shared development environments may face wider exposure. The requirement for user interaction (terminal must be active) provides limited mitigation, as developers typically keep Warp running continuously.
Affected systems
Warp users running versions 0.2025.04.09.08.11.stable_00 through 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_00 are affected. The vulnerability is specific to Warp's Agent code search tools (Grep and FileGlob actions) and only manifests when those tools are invoked by an agent during an active terminal session. Systems without Warp installed, or running patched versions 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01 or later, are not vulnerable. The attack surface is limited to environments where Warp agents are enabled and trusted to perform searches.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires local presence (AV:L) and user interaction in the form of an active Warp terminal session. No elevated privileges are needed (PR:N); the attacker leverages the user's existing permissions. Attack complexity is low (AC:L)—no special conditions or race conditions are necessary. The practical barrier is gaining control of or manipulating an agent instance to inject malicious search parameters. For external attackers, this typically means compromising the agent backend service or conducting a man-in-the-middle attack on agent communications. For insiders, it may be as simple as crafting a malicious agent prompt or contributing poisoned code to a third-party agent library. Once triggered, the impact is severe: confidentiality, integrity, and availability are all at high risk.
Remediation
Immediate action: Upgrade Warp to version 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01 or later. This is a mandatory security update that patches the command injection flaw by properly sanitizing and parameterizing shell command construction in the Grep and FileGlob implementations. Until patched, organizations should consider disabling Agent search features if not actively required, or restricting agent access to trusted, internally-controlled backends. Review and audit any agent integrations or third-party agent libraries for similar command injection patterns. Monitor for suspicious terminal activity or unexpected file access on developer machines.
Patch guidance
Warp auto-updates by default; however, verify that your installation has reached version 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01 or later by checking Help > About or the application settings. If auto-update is disabled, navigate to the download or settings page to manually trigger an update. Teams managing Warp deployments should verify rollout completion across all developer workstations before considering the vulnerability closed. Test agent search functionality post-update to confirm normal operation. If you cannot immediately patch, disable Agent features in Warp preferences and rely on native shell search until remediation is possible.
Detection guidance
Monitor for unexpected shell command execution patterns originating from Warp or its agent services, particularly grep and file glob operations with unusual arguments or special characters. Inspect terminal history and process logs for commands that do not match developer intent (e.g., curl, wget, or bash -c from search operations). Watch for authentication artifacts (SSH keys, tokens) or source code being accessed by Warp processes. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools should alert on process execution chains where Warp or agent child processes spawn shells with suspicious argument patterns. In Warp logs (if available), look for search operations that coincide with unexpected system calls or file system access.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits urgent attention due to its HIGH CVSS score (7.8), high impact potential (C:H/I:H/A:H), and the trusted position Warp occupies in developer workflows. The attack surface is broad—any organization using Warp agents—and exploitation requires only user interaction (common in development environments). The lack of elevated privilege requirements and low attack complexity make this a realistic risk. While not yet in the KEV catalog, the combination of impact, reach, and exploitability makes this a top-tier patch priority for any team using Warp in active development.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 7.8 (HIGH) reflects a local, low-complexity attack with high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The AV:L and PR:N factors limit exposure to users with local access, but AV:L does not mean 'difficult'—local access is inherent to development workstations. The UI:R (user interaction required) is satisfied by the normal act of running Warp and using agent features. The S:U (scope unchanged) indicates impact is confined to the user's system, not a network-wide compromise from a single exploit. However, the high impact scores (C:H/I:H/A:H) and the prevalence of Warp in engineering environments elevate business risk beyond the base score.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability require the Warp agent to be malicious, or can it be exploited passively?
Exploitation requires the agent—whether a backend service, third-party integration, or a compromised agent process—to craft and send a malicious search request to Warp's Grep or FileGlob tools. It is not a passive vulnerability that triggers on its own. An attacker must actively manipulate the agent or control the agent backend. However, if a public agent service is compromised, all Warp users relying on it could be silently exploited.
If I disable Warp's agent features, am I fully protected until I can patch?
Disabling agent search features removes the primary attack vector, since the Grep and FileGlob actions are only exposed through the agent interface. However, patching is still strongly recommended, as other agent-related features or future agent enhancements might inherit similar command construction patterns. Treat disabling as a temporary mitigation, not a permanent substitute for patching.
Can I detect if I've been compromised by this vulnerability?
Look for unexpected shell commands in terminal history or process logs that do not match your actions, especially commands that coincide with Warp search operations. EDR and SIEM tools can help: alert on Warp child processes spawning shells with special characters (pipes, semicolons, command substitution). Retrospective detection is challenging if logs are not retained; prioritize forward-looking monitoring after patching.
Does this vulnerability affect Warp if it is run in a sandboxed or restricted environment?
Sandboxing or privilege restrictions would limit the damage an attacker could inflict, but would not prevent exploitation of the vulnerability itself. The command injection still occurs; the impact is just constrained by the sandbox boundaries. For sensitive environments, sandboxing is a good defense-in-depth layer, but patching remains essential.
This analysis is based on the published CVE record and vendor advisory as of 2026-06-25. Readers should verify patch version numbers and availability directly with Warp through official channels. This vulnerability does not appear on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list as of the publication date, but this status may change. No exploit code is provided or referenced in this advisory. Organizations should conduct independent risk assessment and testing before deploying patches in production environments. SEC.co does not assume liability for decisions made based on this intelligence. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-02. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-41265HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host OS Command Injection (CVSS 7.2)
- CVE-2025-41266HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2025-41267HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-41279HIGHOS Command Injection in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host Administration WebUI
- CVE-2025-41281HIGHWaterfall WF-500 OS Command Injection
- CVE-2025-66273HIGHQNAP Command Injection in QTS and QuTS hero
- CVE-2025-66279HIGHQNAP NAS Command Injection – Admin Authentication Required, HIGH Severity
- CVE-2025-69755HIGHNeterbit NW-431F Router RCE and Data Exposure Vulnerability