HIGH 8.6

CVE-2026-48285: Adobe ColdFusion SSRF Vulnerability – HIGH Risk Remote Exploitation

Adobe ColdFusion contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that allows attackers to bypass security controls and read sensitive data without any user interaction. Versions 2025.9, 2023.20, and earlier are affected. An attacker on the network can exploit this remotely to make the ColdFusion server fetch or interact with internal resources, potentially exposing confidential information or accessing protected systems behind the application.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 8.6 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-918
Affected products
31 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-30 / 2026-06-30

NVD description (verbatim)

ColdFusion versions 2025.9, 2023.20 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-48285 is an SSRF vulnerability (CWE-918) in Adobe ColdFusion that permits an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to circumvent security mechanisms and achieve unauthorized read access to restricted resources. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.6 (HIGH) with a vector of AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N, indicating network accessibility, no special conditions required, no privileges needed, no user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality impact. The modified scope designation means an attacker can affect resources beyond the vulnerable component itself.

Business impact

This vulnerability poses a significant data exposure risk to organizations running vulnerable ColdFusion instances. Attackers can leverage SSRF to read sensitive files, access internal APIs, retrieve database credentials, or exfiltrate proprietary information. The lack of authentication requirements and user interaction means the attack surface is immediate and broad. Depending on internal network architecture, an attacker could pivot to other systems, extract configuration data, or access backend services that should be isolated from external reach.

Affected systems

Adobe ColdFusion versions 2025.9, 2023.20, and all earlier releases are vulnerable. Organizations must audit their ColdFusion deployments across development, staging, and production environments to identify which versions are in use. This includes legacy installations that may still be running unsupported releases.

Exploitability

Exploitability is high. The vulnerability requires no authentication, no privileges, no special network conditions, and no user interaction—an attacker can directly craft a malicious request to a vulnerable ColdFusion instance and trigger the SSRF. The network accessibility (AV:N) combined with low complexity (AC:L) means any entity with network connectivity to the target can attempt exploitation. This is not a vulnerability that requires sophisticated social engineering or insider knowledge; it is a fundamental design or validation flaw in how ColdFusion handles external requests.

Remediation

Organizations should immediately upgrade to a patched version of ColdFusion. Verify against Adobe's official security advisory for the specific version numbers that contain the fix, as they are not enumerated in the available source data. As an interim measure, implement network-level controls: restrict outbound connections from ColdFusion servers to internal and external destinations, use allowlists for legitimate service communication, and monitor outbound requests for anomalous activity. Consider disabling or restricting ColdFusion features that trigger HTTP requests if not required for business operations.

Patch guidance

Contact Adobe or consult their official security bulletins to obtain patched versions that resolve CVE-2026-48285. Test patches in a non-production environment before deployment. Given the high severity and ease of exploitation, prioritize patching as an emergency maintenance task. If immediate patching is not feasible due to application compatibility, implement the interim network controls and monitoring described above.

Detection guidance

Monitor ColdFusion access logs and proxy logs for unusual outbound HTTP/HTTPS requests originating from ColdFusion application servers, particularly to internal IP ranges (RFC 1918), localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints. Set alerts for requests to file:// schemes or unexpected internal API calls. Intrusion detection systems should flag requests that appear to probe internal resources. Enable detailed logging of ColdFusion HTTP client operations and correlate with web application activity to identify reconnaissance patterns.

Why prioritize this

CVE-2026-48285 warrants immediate attention due to its HIGH CVSS score (8.6), network exploitability, lack of authentication requirement, and direct confidentiality impact. The changed scope means an attacker can affect trust boundaries within the organization's infrastructure. SSRF vulnerabilities are frequently leveraged in multi-stage attacks to gain lateral movement, and the absence of user interaction means continuous exposure. Any organization with internet-facing or internal ColdFusion instances should treat this as a critical patch priority.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.6 reflects a network-attackable vulnerability with no prerequisites, combined with high confidentiality impact and scope change. The vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N) indicates that an attacker needs minimal effort to exploit the flaw and can access sensitive information affecting resources beyond the ColdFusion application itself. The absence of integrity or availability impact (I:N/A:N) keeps the score below critical, but the broad attack surface and data exposure justifies HIGH severity in practical business terms.

Frequently asked questions

Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely without network access to our internal infrastructure?

Yes. If your ColdFusion instance is exposed to the internet or accessible from any untrusted network, an attacker can trigger the SSRF remotely. The attacker does not need direct access to your internal systems; they exploit ColdFusion as a proxy to reach them.

What types of data or systems are at risk if this vulnerability is exploited?

An attacker can read files on the ColdFusion server, access internal APIs, retrieve credentials from configuration files or environment variables, interact with internal databases, and potentially reach other backend services on your network. The risk depends on what resources the ColdFusion application is authorized to access.

If ColdFusion is not internet-facing, do we still need to patch immediately?

Yes. Even internal-only ColdFusion instances should be patched promptly. Insider threats, compromised workstations, or lateral movement from other breached systems can still exploit this vulnerability. The lack of authentication requirement means any network neighbor can attack.

What should we do while waiting for the patch to be fully tested and deployed?

Immediately implement network egress filtering to restrict ColdFusion's outbound connections to approved destinations only. Enable detailed logging of outbound HTTP requests. Monitor for suspicious patterns. If feasible, isolate vulnerable ColdFusion instances or take them offline until patched. Verify your current ColdFusion version against the affected list.

This analysis is based on the published CVE record and CVSS scoring as of the date provided. Specific patch version numbers and detailed exploit vectors are not included to prevent misuse. Organizations should verify all remediation steps against Adobe's official security advisories and conduct internal testing before deployment. This information is provided for informational and defensive security purposes. No warranty is made regarding completeness or accuracy of mitigation guidance. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-09. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).