CVE-2026-47903: Adobe CAI Content Credentials Input Validation DoS Vulnerability
CAI Content Credentials, Adobe's implementation for managing content provenance and authenticity, contains a flaw in how it validates input data. Versions [email protected], c2pa-v0.80.1 and earlier can be crashed by sending specially crafted input, causing a denial-of-service condition. No user interaction is required—an attacker can trigger the crash remotely, making this a network-reachable availability risk.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 6.2 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-20
- Affected products
- 2 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-09 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
CAI Content Credentials versions [email protected], c2pa-v0.80.1 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to crash the application, leading to a denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-47903 is an improper input validation vulnerability (CWE-20) in Adobe's Content Authenticity Initiative (CAI) implementation. The flaw allows unauthenticated, unauthenticated attackers to trigger an application crash by supplying malformed or unexpected input to c2pa-web or c2pa library versions up to and including 0.7.1 and 0.80.1 respectively. The local attack vector and lack of prerequisites indicate the vulnerability is reachable in typical deployment scenarios, though the impact is limited to availability (crash), with no confidentiality or integrity compromise.
Business impact
Organizations deploying c2pa for content authentication workflows face service disruption risk. A successful denial-of-service attack could interrupt content verification pipelines, impact user-facing authentication features, and degrade service availability. For media and publishing platforms relying on CAI for provenance verification, this could undermine trust in content authenticity checks. The medium severity reflects the availability-only impact; however, repeated DoS attacks could have cumulative operational consequences.
Affected systems
Adobe c2pa library (version 0.80.1 and earlier) and c2pa-web package (version 0.7.1 and earlier) are affected. This includes any application or service that integrates these libraries, particularly web applications using c2pa-web for client-side content verification, and backend systems using the c2pa library for authentication workflows. Organizations should inventory all internal and third-party integrations of these components.
Exploitability
Exploitability is straightforward due to the local attack vector, lack of authentication requirements, and no user interaction needed. However, practical exploitation depends on whether the affected component is network-exposed or accessible to untrusted input sources. Applications that accept untrusted c2pa data for processing (e.g., uploaded manifests, external content metadata) face direct risk. The vulnerability is not currently tracked in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, but the low barrier to exploitation warrants rapid assessment and patching.
Remediation
Upgrade c2pa-web to a version beyond 0.7.1 and c2pa to a version beyond 0.80.1. Verify compatibility with your application stack and test thoroughly in a staging environment before production deployment. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider implementing network-level or application-level input validation to reject malformed c2pa data structures and limit exposure to untrusted sources.
Patch guidance
Consult Adobe's official security advisories for specific patch version numbers and compatibility notes. Patches are expected to be available for both npm (c2pa-web) and the core c2pa library. Establish a staged rollout: first test in development, then staging with real-world content samples, then production. Monitor logs for any input validation errors or crashes during and after deployment to confirm remediation effectiveness.
Detection guidance
Monitor application logs and error reporting for repeated crashes or exceptions originating from c2pa input parsing. Watch for HTTP 500 errors, segmentation faults, or unexpected process terminations correlated with c2pa library calls. Implement input validation upstream of c2pa to catch obviously malformed data. Threat hunters should review authentication flow logs and content verification pipeline metrics for anomalous patterns indicative of DoS attempts.
Why prioritize this
Although severity is medium, the lack of authentication requirements and zero user interaction make this a high-priority patch candidate for systems that expose c2pa functionality to untrusted input. Prioritize systems handling user-uploaded content, external manifests, or API endpoints that consume c2pa data. Organizations with SLAs tied to content authentication availability should treat this as critical for their specific risk context.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.2 (MEDIUM) reflects a local attack vector with low complexity and no privileges required, resulting in high availability impact but no confidentiality or integrity loss. While the score is medium, the practical risk is elevated for web-facing or API-driven deployments that accept untrusted c2pa input, warranting treatment above the base score in threat modeling.
Frequently asked questions
Is this vulnerability being actively exploited in the wild?
No, this vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog as of the advisory date. However, given the low barrier to exploitation, organizations should not delay patching on the assumption of low threat.
Can this vulnerability lead to data loss or corruption?
No. The vulnerability impacts availability only; it causes an application crash. There is no confidentiality compromise (data disclosure) or integrity compromise (data modification). Users and administrators should focus mitigation efforts on service restoration and preventing repeated DoS attacks.
Do we need to update c2pa if we only use it for offline content verification?
If your c2pa deployment is truly offline and does not receive input from untrusted sources, risk is reduced. However, supply chain risks and potential future API exposure make updating advisable as a best practice. Verify your actual threat model and data flow.
What should we monitor after applying the patch?
After patching, monitor for any regressions in content verification functionality, performance anomalies, and compatibility issues with existing manifests. Validate that previously working content authenticity workflows still function correctly. Log any input validation rejections to tune upstream filtering if applied.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and should not be considered legal or professional security advice. Patch version numbers and compatibility details must be verified against Adobe's official security advisories before deployment. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment, testing, and validation in alignment with their specific infrastructure, threat model, and compliance obligations. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of third-party source data. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-19. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-47909MEDIUMDreamweaver Arbitrary File Read via Input Validation Flaw
- CVE-2026-34712HIGHAdobe C2PA Input Validation Denial-of-Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-47930HIGHAdobe ColdFusion Input Validation Bypass
- CVE-2026-47931HIGHAdobe ColdFusion Arbitrary Code Execution via Input Validation Flaw
- CVE-2026-48288LOWAdobe Experience Manager Input Validation Bypass – Security Impact & Patching Guide
- CVE-2026-48289LOWAdobe Experience Manager Input Validation Bypass – Patches & Mitigation
- CVE-2025-5089MEDIUMArista EOS/CVX DoS via Malformed Messages
- CVE-2025-5090MEDIUMCVX CVE-2025-5090: Input Validation Flaw Leads to Agent Crashes and Denial of Service