MEDIUM 6.5

CVE-2025-5089: Arista EOS/CVX DoS via Malformed Messages

CVE-2025-5089 is a denial-of-service vulnerability affecting Arista EOS switches and CloudVision eXchange (CVX) servers when they communicate with each other. When either device receives specially crafted messages over their management connection, it can crash internal system processes, causing the EOS switch to reset or the CVX cluster to become unstable. An attacker would need legitimate administrative access to one of these connected devices to exploit this vulnerability—it cannot be triggered remotely by an unauthenticated outsider.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 6.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-20
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-05 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

In a CVX cluster, an EOS switch connected to a CVX server is not resilient to certain malformed messages received from the connected CVX server. Similarly, the CVX server is not resilient to certain malformed messages received from the connected EOS switch. This leads to either a Sysdb agent crash on the EOS device causing a soft reset of the switch or agent crashes on the CVX server causing instability of the CVX cluster. An attacker could use this behavior to create a denial of service (DoS) scenario. Note that this would require the attacker to already have a high privilege access to the connected device to be able to send custom TCP packets. EOS switches that are not connected to a CVX server are not impacted.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation (CWE-20) in the message-handling logic between EOS switches and CVX servers. Both endpoints fail to properly sanitize or validate certain malformed TCP messages exchanged during normal cluster communication. This causes the Sysdb agent on EOS devices to crash (triggering a soft reset) or agents on the CVX server to fail (destabilizing the cluster). The flaw requires the attacker to possess high-privilege credentials on the connected device and the ability to craft and transmit custom TCP packets. EOS switches operating in standalone mode, without CVX connectivity, are unaffected because the vulnerable code path is not exercised.

Business impact

For organizations running CVX-managed EOS clusters, this vulnerability could enable a privileged insider to disrupt network operations by causing controlled device resets or cluster instability. Repeated exploitation could extend downtime and force repeated recovery procedures. The impact is primarily operational—confidentiality and integrity are not threatened. Organizations relying on CVX for centralized network policy management should weigh the operational risk against their insider-threat model and access controls.

Affected systems

Arista EOS switches that are actively connected to a CVX server are at risk. The CVX server itself is also vulnerable to crashing when receiving malformed messages from a connected EOS device. Standalone EOS deployments without CVX integration are not affected. Specific product versions and patch availability should be verified against Arista's advisory documentation.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires an attacker with already-established high-privilege credentials on either the EOS switch or CVX server. The attacker must then craft and transmit malformed TCP packets over the management connection. This high privilege requirement significantly limits attack surface—the threat model is primarily insider-risk rather than external compromise. However, within that constraint, the attack is straightforward and does not require sophisticated techniques or user interaction.

Remediation

Apply the security patches released by Arista for both EOS and CVX. Until patches are available or deployed, restrict administrative access to EOS and CVX devices to trusted personnel only, and monitor management connections for anomalous activity. Consider network segmentation to isolate CVX management traffic from less-trusted network zones.

Patch guidance

Consult Arista's official security advisory for CVE-2025-5089 to identify the specific patched versions for your EOS and CVX releases. Patches should be applied to both EOS switches and CVX servers in a coordinated manner to prevent communication issues during the patching window. Test patches in a non-production environment first, as cluster reconfigurations may be necessary. Because the CVX cluster depends on stable communication with all connected switches, stagger patching to maintain cluster stability.

Detection guidance

Monitor Sysdb agent restart events on EOS devices and agent crash logs on CVX servers. Anomalous TCP traffic to management ports (especially from administrative users) followed by agent crashes or device resets warrants investigation. Configure alerting for unexpected switch resets or CVX cluster state changes. Review AAA logs to identify which high-privilege accounts have accessed these devices recently, and correlate access timing with stability events.

Why prioritize this

Although the CVSS score is MEDIUM (6.5), the practical risk depends heavily on your environment. If you operate a CVX cluster, prioritize patching because insider threats are difficult to prevent entirely and the DoS impact can be significant. If you run EOS without CVX, this vulnerability does not apply. The high-privilege requirement means this is not an emergency, but it should not be indefinitely deferred—schedule patching within your normal security update cycle.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 6.5 reflects a networked vulnerability (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L) that requires legitimate login (PR:L), causes high availability impact (A:H), but no confidentiality or integrity damage. The score appropriately captures that an authenticated insider can reliably trigger a denial of service. The lack of CUI/CIA components and the high privilege bar keep the score from exceeding MEDIUM severity.

Frequently asked questions

Does this affect EOS switches that are not connected to CVX?

No. Standalone EOS switches are not vulnerable because the vulnerable message-handling code is only invoked when processing CVX communications. Only EOS switches that are actively managed by or in communication with a CVX server are at risk.

Can an external attacker exploit this without valid credentials?

No. The attacker must already possess high-privilege administrative access to one of the connected devices (EOS or CVX) and be able to craft and transmit custom TCP packets. Unauthenticated remote users cannot trigger this vulnerability.

What is the impact of exploitation?

The impact is denial of service: EOS switches experience a soft reset (reboot), and CVX servers experience agent instability. There is no data theft, encryption, or lateral movement—the attacker can only disrupt availability of the affected devices.

Should I apply patches immediately or can I schedule them normally?

Given the high-privilege requirement, this is not an emergency-response priority, but it should be scheduled within your standard security patching window. If your environment has significant insider-threat concerns or if CVX cluster stability is business-critical, prioritize earlier patching. For typical environments, scheduling within the next 30–60 days is reasonable.

This analysis is based on the published CVE record as of the date shown. Specific affected product versions, patch version numbers, and detailed remediation steps should be verified against Arista's official security advisory. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept details are provided. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment and test patches in a controlled environment before production deployment. This vulnerability requires high-privilege access; the practical risk varies based on your access-control posture and insider-threat model. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-14. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).