CVE-2026-46746: SINEC INS Command Injection in File Upload API
SINEC INS, a Siemens industrial networking application, contains a command injection vulnerability in its file upload functionality. An authenticated user can craft malicious directory names that bypass input validation, plant shell commands, and trigger their execution when the application later retrieves directory listings. The attacker gains command execution at the privilege level of the service account, potentially compromising the entire system. All versions before 1.0 SP2 Update 6 are affected.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-78
- Affected products
- 8 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-09 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 6). The application does not properly sanitize user input in the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint, allowing the injection of shell command payloads via crafted directory names. These payloads are stored and executed when directory listings are retrieved. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the affected service user (sinecins).
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-46746 is an OS command injection flaw (CWE-78) in the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint of SINEC INS. The vulnerability stems from insufficient sanitization of user-supplied directory names. When a crafted payload is submitted during file upload, the unsanitized input is stored without proper escaping. Subsequent directory enumeration operations execute the injected shell commands within the context of the sinecins service user. The attack requires valid authentication but no additional user interaction, making it a post-authentication remote code execution vector with a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 (HIGH).
Business impact
Successful exploitation enables remote code execution on systems running vulnerable SINEC INS instances. An authenticated insider or compromised credential holder can execute arbitrary system commands, leading to data exfiltration, malware installation, lateral movement, denial of service, or sabotage of industrial network monitoring and management functions. Organizations relying on SINEC INS for critical network visibility and control face operational disruption and potential compliance violations if confidentiality or integrity of network configurations is compromised.
Affected systems
Siemens SINEC INS versions prior to 1.0 SP2 Update 6 are vulnerable. Verify your installed version against the vendor advisory. The vulnerability requires network accessibility to the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint and valid authentication credentials, so exposure is limited to environments where SINEC INS is deployed and user access controls are misconfigured or credentials are compromised.
Exploitability
Exploitability is moderate to high among credentialed attackers. The attack requires valid authentication—a significant barrier for external threats but a realistic scenario for insider threats or attackers who have obtained legitimate credentials through phishing, lateral movement, or supply chain compromise. No user interaction is needed; the payload executes automatically during normal directory listing operations. No public exploit code status is currently tracked in the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
Remediation
Upgrade SINEC INS to version 1.0 SP2 Update 6 or later. This patch version applies input validation and output encoding to sanitize directory names and prevent command injection. Organizations unable to patch immediately should restrict network access to the SINEC INS API endpoints, enforce strong authentication policies, and monitor for suspicious directory creation patterns.
Patch guidance
Apply Siemens security update for SINEC INS 1.0 SP2 Update 6 or newer. Consult the official Siemens ProductSecurity advisory for download links, installation instructions, and rollback procedures. Test the patch in a staging environment before production deployment to ensure compatibility with your network configuration and any custom integrations. Verify successful patch installation by confirming the updated version number and re-running vulnerability scans.
Detection guidance
Monitor web application and file transfer logs for requests to /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoints containing suspicious characters or shell metacharacters (e.g., $, `, |, ;, &, >, <) in directory name parameters. Look for unusual directory creation events followed by unexpected process spawning under the sinecins service user account. Implement runtime application self-protection (RASP) rules to block command execution attempts within the SINEC INS process. Network IDS/IPS signatures should flag payloads with common shell injection patterns targeting this endpoint.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits high-priority remediation due to its HIGH CVSS score (8.8), post-authentication remote code execution capability, and direct impact on industrial network management infrastructure. Although it requires valid credentials, the combination of high severity, automated payload execution, and potential for lateral movement in critical infrastructure environments justifies urgent patching. Defer to operational risk assessment: if SINEC INS manages production networks, prioritize patching within days rather than weeks.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects high attack complexity from a network perspective (AV:N), low complexity once authenticated (AC:L), requirement for valid credentials (PR:L), absence of user interaction (UI:N), and impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability within the service scope (C:H/I:H/A:H). The score appropriately captures the risk of arbitrary code execution at service-account privilege; the main limiting factor is the authentication requirement, which does not apply in scenarios of credential compromise.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to be on the network to exploit this?
No, the vulnerability is accessible over the network (AV:N). However, you must possess valid credentials to the SINEC INS application. Network segmentation that restricts access to the API endpoint and strong authentication policies significantly reduce exposure.
Will upgrading to 1.0 SP2 Update 6 break my existing configurations?
Patch testing is essential. Security patches typically preserve configuration compatibility, but you should validate in a staging environment before production deployment. Consult the Siemens release notes and your system documentation for any deprecations or changes.
Is this vulnerability being actively exploited?
As of the publication date, this vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, meaning no evidence of active exploitation has been publicly disclosed. However, the high CVSS score and low barrier to exploitation for insiders warrant prompt patching regardless of exploitation status.
How does this affect air-gapped systems?
If your SINEC INS instance is air-gapped (not connected to untrusted networks), exposure is limited to insider threats and supply-chain compromise vectors. However, if any integrated systems or management interfaces have network connectivity, or if the instance processes data from external sources, the risk profile escalates.
This analysis is based on published vulnerability data and general cybersecurity best practices. Verify all patch versions, affected product ranges, and vendor advisories against official Siemens security documentation before deploying patches or making business decisions. SEC.co does not provide warranty of accuracy for third-party software configurations or compliance determinations. Testing of patches in non-production environments is mandatory. Consult your internal security and engineering teams for risk assessment specific to your infrastructure. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-16. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-41265HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host OS Command Injection (CVSS 7.2)
- CVE-2025-41266HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2025-41267HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-41279HIGHOS Command Injection in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host Administration WebUI
- CVE-2025-41281HIGHWaterfall WF-500 OS Command Injection
- CVE-2025-69755HIGHNeterbit NW-431F Router RCE and Data Exposure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10214HIGHCommand Injection in chatgpt-on-wechat Bash Tool
- CVE-2026-10219HIGHGoClaw Command Injection Vulnerability