CVE-2026-45045: Fiber Web Framework X-Real-IP Header Injection Vulnerability
A flaw in the Fiber web framework allows attackers to inject a false X-Real-IP header that bypasses the proxy's intended override mechanism. When Fiber's BalancerForward proxy helper processes requests, it appends attacker-supplied IP values instead of replacing them, causing upstream systems to log or enforce policies based on the attacker's spoofed IP rather than the true client IP. This undermines logging accuracy, rate-limiting enforcement, and IP-based access controls downstream.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-290
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-08 / 2026-07-15
NVD description (verbatim)
Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Prior to 3.3.0 and 2.52.14, the BalancerForward proxy helper in middleware/proxy/proxy.go uses Header.Add() instead of Header.Set() when injecting X-Real-IP, allowing an attacker-supplied first X-Real-IP value to be forwarded to upstream servers for logging, rate limiting, and access control. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.0 and 2.52.14.
7 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The BalancerForward proxy helper in Fiber's middleware/proxy/proxy.go uses Header.Add() instead of Header.Set() when injecting the X-Real-IP header. This implementation error allows multiple X-Real-IP values to exist in the same request; if an attacker supplies an X-Real-IP header in their initial request, that value is preserved and forwarded alongside the legitimate one, allowing the attacker's IP to be the first value parsed by upstream systems. The vulnerability is cataloged under CWE-290 (Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input), reflecting the failure to enforce a single canonical IP representation.
Business impact
Organizations relying on X-Real-IP for security decisions face direct operational risk. Rate-limiting policies keyed to client IP can be circumvented, authentication logs will attribute requests to spoofed addresses complicating forensic investigation, and IP-based access control lists become unreliable. In regulated environments, inaccurate logging of true client IPs may create compliance violations. The impact is especially acute for SaaS platforms and APIs where per-IP quotas or geographic restrictions are security controls.
Affected systems
Fiber web framework versions prior to 3.3.0 and 2.52.14 are affected. Any deployment using BalancerForward (or relying on X-Real-IP injection via Fiber's proxy middleware) with upstream systems that parse this header is vulnerable. Go-based services using Fiber as their HTTP handler are the direct target; the upstream impact depends on how downstream servers process the X-Real-IP field.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires no authentication, no user interaction, and only network access to the Fiber application. An attacker crafts a request with a custom X-Real-IP header; the flaw guarantees it will be forwarded unchanged. The CVSS score of 5.3 reflects the low attack complexity and network accessibility, moderated by the integrity (not confidentiality or availability) impact and the constraint that actual harm depends on downstream system behavior. Exploitation is trivial from a technical standpoint—any HTTP client can set headers.
Remediation
Upgrade Fiber to version 3.3.0 or later for the main branch, or to version 2.52.14 for the 2.x stable branch. The fix replaces Header.Add() with Header.Set(), ensuring only one X-Real-IP value is present in forwarded requests. Organizations should verify their specific Fiber version against the vendor advisory to confirm their patch target, then apply updates across all Fiber-based services in their environment.
Patch guidance
Identify all services running Fiber by checking go.mod or dependency manifests for the github.com/gofiber/fiber module. Record the current version for each service. For versions prior to 3.3.0 or 2.52.14 (depending on your major version track), plan an upgrade: pull the patched version, test in a staging environment to ensure middleware behavior remains as expected, then promote to production. Given the low to medium severity and the simplicity of the patch (a single method call change), standard change management procedures apply; this is not an emergency patch but should be prioritized in the next regular release cycle.
Detection guidance
Monitor upstream system logs (load balancers, WAF, application servers) for multiple X-Real-IP values in a single request—this indicates header injection. Use HTTP inspection tools or logging middleware to inspect the raw X-Real-IP header value before it reaches your application. Rate-limit and access-control logs that suddenly show traffic from unexpected or impossible IP addresses (e.g., internal IPs or known non-routable ranges appearing in client-attribution fields) may indicate exploitation. Correlate with request timestamps and payloads to identify patterns of spoofing.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is moderate (5.3), the integrity impact on logging and access control is significant in environments where these are security controls. Unpatched Fiber deployments that feed X-Real-IP to downstream systems for rate-limiting or geo-blocking should patch within 30 days. Organizations without such downstream dependencies (or those that ignore X-Real-IP) face lower risk and can batch the update with routine maintenance. The absence of this CVE from the CISA KEV catalog suggests no active in-the-wild exploitation as of the publication date, reducing immediate pressure but not eliminating the need for timely remediation.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) assigns 5.3 because the attack vector is network-accessible, attack complexity is low, no privileges are required, no user interaction is needed, and the scope is unchanged. The integrity impact is rated 'Low' because the attacker can forge the X-Real-IP value but cannot directly modify data or execute commands—the harm flows through misled downstream systems. Confidentiality and availability are unaffected by the header injection alone. Organizations with strict IP-based security policies may assess their own risk higher than the base score warrants.
Frequently asked questions
Does this affect all Fiber users or only those using BalancerForward?
Specifically, BalancerForward and any code path that injects X-Real-IP via Header.Add() are vulnerable. If your application does not use Fiber's proxy middleware or does not rely on X-Real-IP for downstream decision-making, your exposure is lower—but upgrading remains prudent to avoid latent risk if middleware is added later.
What happens if our upstream systems ignore the X-Real-IP header?
If downstream servers do not parse or act on X-Real-IP, the vulnerability has limited practical impact. However, this is not a reliable defense; you should still patch because future integrations or logging infrastructure may consume the header, and the fix is low-cost.
Can we work around this without upgrading?
Potential mitigations include (1) stripping or validating X-Real-IP in a custom middleware layer before it reaches BalancerForward, (2) filtering incoming X-Real-IP headers at your ingress (load balancer or reverse proxy) to prevent user-supplied values from entering your Fiber app, or (3) disabling BalancerForward if it is not essential. These are temporary measures and no substitute for patching.
Is this vulnerability being exploited in the wild?
As of the publication date, this CVE is not listed on the CISA KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) catalog, suggesting no documented active exploitation. However, the ease of exploitation means defenders should not rely on obscurity; patch proactively rather than waiting for threat intelligence reports.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects publicly available vulnerability data as of the publication date. Security assessments must account for your specific environment, upstream integrations, and threat model. Verify patch version numbers and compatibility against the official Fiber project release notes and vendor advisories before deploying. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided herein. Organizations are responsible for testing patches in staging environments and coordinating upgrades according to their change management policies. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of remediation steps and recommends consulting Fiber documentation and your own security team for environment-specific guidance. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-17. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-11001MEDIUMGoogle Chrome UI Spoofing in Payments – Patch Now
- CVE-2026-11019MEDIUMChrome Android Payments Domain Spoofing Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-13984MEDIUMChrome TabStrip UI Spoofing Vulnerability – Patch to 150.0.7871.47
- CVE-2026-13985MEDIUMChrome MediaCapture UI Spoofing Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-14118MEDIUMChrome DevTools Cross-Origin Data Leak Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-14381MEDIUMChrome WebAppInstalls UI Spoofing Vulnerability (v150)
- CVE-2026-49231MEDIUMApache APISIX OPA Plugin Authentication Bypass
- CVE-2026-52690MEDIUMDNS Recursor EDNS Spoofing Vulnerability Undermines DNSSEC Validation