CVE-2026-44958: Revive Adserver Banner Access Control Bypass (CVSS 5.4)
Revive Adserver versions 6.0.6 and earlier contain a flaw that allows advertiser-level users to toggle banner advertisements on and off without proper authorization. An attacker with basic advertiser credentials can activate or deactivate banners belonging to other accounts or campaigns, disrupting ad delivery even if they lack permission to make such changes. The vulnerability stems from inadequate permission checks in the banner management interface.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.0 · 5.4 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-284
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-23 / 2026-06-23
NVD description (verbatim)
An access control bypass allows an advertiser‑level user to activate or deactivate a banner in Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier, even when such permissions were not granted. The banner-edit.php script allowed the banner status to be overwritten solely based on banner edit permissions. The status field has been removed from the hidden form fields in the banner edit screen.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-44958 is an access control bypass in Revive Adserver's banner-edit.php script. The vulnerability arises because the status field (which controls whether a banner is active or inactive) was processed based solely on banner edit permissions, without independent authorization checks for status changes. An advertiser-level user submitting a crafted request with a modified status parameter can alter the enabled/disabled state of any banner they can otherwise edit. The fix involves removing the status field from hidden form fields exposed to the client-side editor, preventing unauthenticated status modifications.
Business impact
Organizations using Revive Adserver to manage programmatic ad campaigns face potential service disruption. A compromised or malicious advertiser account can selectively disable revenue-generating banners or activate unwanted advertisements, causing financial loss through interrupted ad delivery, degraded campaign performance, or brand reputation damage if unauthorized ads appear. The impact scales with reliance on Revive Adserver for ad operations and the sensitivity of advertiser relationships.
Affected systems
Revive Adserver versions 6.0.6 and earlier are affected. No vendor or product data was provided in the vulnerability record, so administrators should verify their installed version against Revive Adserver's official release notes and determine applicability within their deployment.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires valid advertiser-level credentials and network access to the Revive Adserver instance. No special tools or user interaction is needed once authenticated. The attack is straightforward: an attacker with a legitimate but low-privileged account can directly manipulate banner status through the web interface or automated requests. This is a low-barrier attack with immediate impact, though it does require prior account compromise or insider access.
Remediation
Upgrade to a patched version of Revive Adserver that addresses this access control bypass. Verify the exact patched version number against Revive Adserver's official security advisories and release notes. As an interim mitigation, restrict advertiser account creation and monitor banner status changes, particularly unexpected disabling of active campaigns.
Patch guidance
Contact Revive Adserver or consult their official security advisory to identify the minimum patched version that resolves CVE-2026-44958. Once identified, plan and execute an upgrade in a maintenance window to minimize disruption to ad operations. Test the patched version in a staging environment first to ensure compatibility with any customizations or integrations. Document the patched version for compliance and audit purposes.
Detection guidance
Monitor audit logs and activity logs within Revive Adserver for unexpected banner status changes, particularly those initiated by advertiser-level accounts or from unusual IP addresses. Correlate with access logs to identify suspicious sessions. Additionally, review banner edit permissions and status-change events to detect patterns of unauthorized modifications. Log aggregation and alerting on status field changes can highlight exploitation attempts.
Why prioritize this
Although rated MEDIUM severity with a CVSS score of 5.4, this vulnerability directly undermines the integrity of ad campaigns and can cause immediate financial or operational harm. The low barrier to exploitation (requiring only advertiser credentials, which are common in shared hosting or SaaS ad platforms) and the direct business impact on revenue-generating systems warrant prompt patching, particularly in production environments managing significant ad inventory or revenue.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.0 score of 5.4 reflects low confidentiality impact (no data disclosure), moderate integrity impact (unauthorized banner status modification), and low availability impact (selective service denial). The vulnerability requires authentication (PR:L) and operates over the network (AV:N) with no special conditions (AC:L). While the score is MEDIUM, the business context of ad operations elevates practical risk: unauthorized banner control can directly reduce revenue or damage advertiser relationships, justifying prioritization above the numerical score alone.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited from outside the organization?
Yes, any advertiser with valid credentials can exploit this remotely. An attacker does not need to be on the same network. However, they do need valid advertiser-level account credentials, either through phishing, credential compromise, or insider access.
Does this vulnerability allow an attacker to see sensitive data like ad performance metrics?
No. The vulnerability is limited to changing banner status (enabled/disabled). It does not grant access to confidential information, analytics, or financial data beyond the ability to disrupt ad campaigns.
What is the difference between this vulnerability and a simple privilege escalation?
This is an improper access control check rather than privilege escalation. An advertiser is not gaining advertiser-level access—they already have it. Instead, they are bypassing a secondary authorization check for a specific action (status change) that should require separate, stricter permissions.
If we disable all advertiser accounts, are we protected?
Disabling advertiser access eliminates the attack surface but also disables legitimate ad operations. A safer approach is to upgrade to the patched version as soon as possible, implement strong password policies, and monitor account activity closely in the interim.
This analysis is based on the CVE-2026-44958 record as of the published date (2026-06-23). Security and vendor information may change; verify all patch versions and affected product details against official Revive Adserver security advisories before making deployment decisions. No liability is assumed for inaccuracies or changes in vendor guidance post-publication. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-28. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2024-27891MEDIUMArista EOS MACsec + Egress ACL Policy Enforcement Failure
- CVE-2025-24165MEDIUMmacOS Permissions Issue Enables Unexpected System Termination
- CVE-2025-43339MEDIUMmacOS Tahoe Sandbox Access Control Bypass Allows User Data Disclosure
- CVE-2025-46308MEDIUMApple iOS, iPadOS, macOS Authorization Bypass—Sensitive Data Disclosure
- CVE-2026-10152MEDIUMImproper Access Control in TaleLin lin-cms-spring-boot Book Endpoint
- CVE-2026-10172MEDIUMBdtask Multi-Store Inventory 1.0 Unrestricted File Upload Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10205MEDIUMUnrestricted File Upload in Metasoft MetaCRM 6.4.0 – Exploit Details & Remediation
- CVE-2026-10255MEDIUMPharmacy Sales System Authentication Bypass – SourceCodester 1.0