HIGH 8.2

CVE-2026-44937: SUSE Rancher Fleet Webhook Authentication Bypass – HIGH Risk

SUSE Rancher Fleet versions 0.15.x, 0.14.x, 0.13.x, and 0.12.x contain a webhook authentication bypass that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge webhook requests. An attacker can exploit this to disrupt services (denial of service) or downgrade package repositories on the same system, potentially exposing infrastructure to older, vulnerable software versions. The vulnerability requires network access but no user interaction or privileges.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 8.2 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-918
Affected products
1 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-07-06 / 2026-07-09

NVD description (verbatim)

Potential forgery of webhook requests when using a unauthenticated webhook in SUSE Rancher Fleet 0.15 before 0.15.2, 0.14 before 0.14.6, 0.13 before 0.13.11 and 0.12 before 0.12.5 could be used by remote attackers to cause a denial of service or a downgrade attack on other repositories on the system.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-44937 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) variant affecting Rancher Fleet's webhook handling mechanism. When webhooks are configured without authentication, the application fails to validate the origin or integrity of incoming webhook payloads. Remote attackers can craft malicious webhook requests that bypass authentication controls, allowing them to trigger unintended state changes in fleet-managed repositories. The vulnerability manifests in repository downgrade scenarios and availability attacks, reflecting improper input validation and lack of cryptographic request signing.

Business impact

Organizations using Rancher Fleet for multi-cluster Kubernetes management face two material risks: service disruption through denial-of-service attacks targeting webhook endpoints, and supply-chain compromise through forced downgrades of container image repositories. The latter scenario is particularly acute if downgraded repositories contain known vulnerabilities, undermining patch management discipline and potentially re-exposing previously remediated flaws. Affected environments should assess whether critical workloads depend on Fleet's auto-update mechanisms.

Affected systems

SUSE Rancher Fleet versions 0.15.0 through 0.15.1, 0.14.0 through 0.14.5, 0.13.0 through 0.13.10, and 0.12.0 through 0.12.4 are vulnerable. Fixed versions are 0.15.2, 0.14.6, 0.13.11, and 0.12.5 respectively. Organizations should verify exact deployment versions in Helm charts or container image tags. The vulnerability exists only in installations where webhooks are explicitly exposed without authentication controls.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires only network-level access to the webhook endpoint; no authentication, user interaction, or elevated privileges are required. The attack surface is high for Fleet instances exposed to untrusted networks. However, impact is limited to denial of service and repository downgrade—not code execution or credential theft. The low complexity and direct network vector (CVSS AV:N/AC:L/PR:N) make this straightforward to execute, though detection may be possible if webhook request logs are monitored.

Remediation

Immediate action: upgrade affected Rancher Fleet instances to patched versions (0.15.2 or later, 0.14.6 or later, 0.13.11 or later, or 0.12.5 or later). Concurrent mitigations include restricting network access to webhook endpoints via firewall rules, enabling webhook authentication/signing verification in Fleet configuration, and implementing request origin validation. Post-patch, validate repository versions to confirm no downgrades occurred during the vulnerability window.

Patch guidance

SUSE provides patched versions for all four minor release streams. Upgrade through your standard Helm or package management workflow: verify the target version corresponds to the patched release (consult the SUSE advisory for exact version mappings). Test in a non-production environment first, particularly if webhooks are central to your deployment automation. No configuration changes are required post-patch, but review webhook security settings to ensure authentication is enabled.

Detection guidance

Monitor webhook endpoint logs for requests from unexpected sources or with malformed payloads. Inspect Fleet's Git repository sync logs for unexpected downgrades in pinned image versions or commit history. Implement alerting for any webhook-triggered repository changes that deviate from planned deployments. Network-level detection can flag unusual POST/PUT activity to webhook paths. Review webhook endpoint access logs for a timeline matching the CVE publication date (2026-07-06) to identify potential exploitation.

Why prioritize this

This vulnerability scores HIGH (CVSS 8.2) due to the combination of unauthenticated remote access, direct availability impact, and supply-chain integrity risk. While not as critical as remote code execution, the ability to degrade repository versions touches fundamental infrastructure reliability. Organizations operating Rancher Fleet in production should prioritize patching within their standard critical-vulnerability SLA, particularly if webhooks are Internet-facing.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 3.1 score of 8.2 reflects: Network-accessible attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privilege requirement (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), uniform scope (S:U), no confidentiality impact (C:N), low integrity impact (I:L), and high availability impact (A:H). The HIGH severity stems primarily from the availability component (denial of service) and the integrity risk of forced downgrades, offset slightly by the absence of direct confidentiality breach.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need to re-authenticate my webhooks after patching?

No immediate re-authentication is required post-patch. However, review your Fleet webhook configuration to ensure authentication is enabled if it wasn't previously. The patch itself addresses the authentication bypass; it does not alter webhook credential requirements.

Can this vulnerability lead to cluster takeover or code execution?

No. This vulnerability is limited to denial of service and repository downgrade attacks. It does not provide shell access, privilege escalation, or direct cluster compromise. However, a downgraded repository could expose you to vulnerabilities in older container images, which could be chained with other exploits.

How do I know if my webhook was exploited?

Check your Git repository's commit history and image version pins for unexpected downgrades during the vulnerability window. Review webhook access logs for requests from unfamiliar IP addresses or with suspicious payloads. If your deployment automation detected unexpected changes, investigate the webhook request that triggered them.

Can I mitigate this without patching immediately?

Yes, as a temporary measure: restrict network access to webhook endpoints using firewall rules, allow only known CI/CD system IPs, and enable authentication (API keys, HMAC signing) in your webhook configuration. These measures reduce but do not eliminate risk. Patching should still be prioritized within your standard SLA.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal or professional security advice. Verify all patch version numbers and affected product details against official SUSE advisories before deploying remediation. The CVSS score and vulnerability details are based on the published advisory as of 2026-07-09. Consult your vendor and internal security policies for prioritization and testing requirements. No liability is assumed for the accuracy of mitigation steps in your specific environment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-15. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).