CVE-2026-4256: LDAP Injection in PEAKUP PassGate – Critical Authentication Risk
PassGate, a product from PEAKUP Technology Inc., contains an LDAP injection vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate LDAP queries without authentication. An attacker can craft malicious input to bypass authentication, extract sensitive directory data, or modify LDAP operations. The vulnerability affects all versions through 30042026 and requires no user interaction—a remote attacker can exploit it directly over the network.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.2 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-90
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-09 / 2026-07-09
NVD description (verbatim)
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an LDAP query ('LDAP injection') vulnerability in PEAKUP Technology Inc. PassGate allows LDAP Injection. This issue affects PassGate: through 30042026.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-4256 is an LDAP injection flaw (CWE-90) in PassGate stemming from improper neutralization of special characters in LDAP query construction. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated, network-accessible exploitation. With a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.2 (HIGH), the attack vector is network-based, complexity is low, and no privileges or user interaction are required. The impact includes high confidentiality loss (unauthorized directory access) and low integrity impact (limited query modification). Availability is not directly affected.
Business impact
Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to directory information stored in LDAP backends, such as user credentials, email addresses, organizational structure, and other sensitive attributes. An attacker could potentially enumerate valid accounts, extract password hashes if stored in LDAP, or modify directory entries depending on PassGate's LDAP permissions model. Organizations relying on PassGate for authentication or directory integration face authentication bypass risks and data exfiltration exposure.
Affected systems
PassGate versions through 30042026 are affected. Consult the vendor advisory to confirm your deployed version and whether your installation uses LDAP as a backend authentication or directory service. The vulnerability is exploitable only if PassGate is exposed to network access and configured to process LDAP queries.
Exploitability
The vulnerability is highly exploitable. No authentication is required, the attack complexity is low, and the flaw can be triggered remotely over standard network connections. An attacker needs only to craft malicious LDAP query syntax in input fields processed by PassGate—a technique well-understood by security researchers and increasingly automated in attack frameworks. The lack of KEV listing does not diminish the practical exploitability; it reflects that active exploitation has not yet been formally documented in public databases at the time of publication.
Remediation
Patch PassGate immediately to a version released after 30042026 per the vendor advisory. Until patching is possible, apply input validation and output encoding to LDAP queries, implement Web Application Firewall rules to block LDAP injection patterns, restrict network access to PassGate to trusted sources only, and consider using prepared statements or parameterized LDAP queries if the product supports them. Validate your remediation with security testing before returning systems to production.
Patch guidance
Contact PEAKUP Technology Inc. or check their official support portal for patches addressing CVE-2026-4256. Patches should be tested in a non-production environment first to verify compatibility with your authentication workflows and any dependent systems. Once validated, deploy patches to all affected instances in a controlled manner. Document the patch version applied and the date of deployment for compliance and incident response records.
Detection guidance
Monitor PassGate logs for unusual LDAP query patterns, including wildcard characters (*), logical operators (|, &, !), parentheses, or escaped sequences in authentication fields or search inputs. Network intrusion detection signatures may identify LDAP injection payloads. Conduct regular vulnerability scanning against PassGate instances to identify unpatched versions. Review LDAP access logs for unauthorized directory queries or failed authentication attempts with malformed syntax.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate attention due to its high CVSS score (8.2), unauthenticated network exploitability, and direct impact on authentication and directory confidentiality. The lack of user interaction required and the common reliance on LDAP in enterprise environments amplify risk. Organizations using PassGate should treat this as a critical patch priority.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.2 reflects the combination of network accessibility (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication requirement (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and significant confidentiality impact (C:H) against LDAP directory data. The low integrity impact (I:L) and no availability impact (A:N) prevent a critical score, but the ease of exploitation and sensitive nature of directory information justify the HIGH severity rating.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited without network access to PassGate?
No. The vulnerability requires network-accessible PassGate instances. If PassGate is restricted to internal networks only or behind network segmentation, exposure is reduced, but patching remains essential for defense-in-depth.
What is the difference between LDAP injection and SQL injection?
Both are injection attacks, but LDAP injection targets directory queries while SQL injection targets databases. LDAP injection modifies directory filters to bypass authentication or extract user records; SQL injection modifies database queries for similar purposes. Mitigation techniques (input validation, parameterized queries) are analogous.
If we're not using LDAP in our PassGate deployment, are we safe?
If PassGate is installed but not configured to use LDAP, or if LDAP is not a backend service in your environment, the attack surface is reduced. However, verify your configuration with the vendor and assume patches are necessary to prevent misconfiguration-based exposure.
Does the absence of a KEV listing mean this vulnerability is less severe?
No. KEV listing indicates known active exploitation in the wild—its absence does not diminish the vulnerability's technical severity or exploitability. Patch based on CVSS score and your risk exposure, not KEV status alone.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal, technical, or professional advice. Vulnerabilities and patches evolve; always verify current information against official vendor advisories and KEV/CISA documentation. Organizations must conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific configurations and threat landscape. No exploit code or weaponizable proof-of-concept details are provided. Consult your vendor and security team before deploying patches to production environments. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-17. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-13696HIGHLDAP Injection in HAVELSAN Liman MYS – Patch & Detection Guide
- CVE-2026-42568MEDIUM(Yamcs LDAP Injection): Patch Guidance & Risk Analysis
- CVE-2026-45559MEDIUMLDAP Injection in Roxy-WI – Information Disclosure in Admin User Enumeration
- CVE-2026-57288LOWJenkins Active Directory Plugin LDAP Injection & Authentication Bypass
- CVE-2016-20062HIGHSQL Injection in Simply Poll 1.4.1 WordPress Plugin - Unauthenticated Data Theft
- CVE-2016-20063HIGHSQL Injection in Single Personal Message 1.0.3 – Credential & Data Theft Risk
- CVE-2016-20065HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in Product Catalog 8 WordPress Plugin
- CVE-2016-20066HIGHWordPress CP Polls 1.0.8 Persistent XSS Vulnerability