CVE-2016-20063: SQL Injection in Single Personal Message 1.0.3 – Credential & Data Theft Risk
Single Personal Message version 1.0.3 contains a SQL injection flaw that allows authenticated users to inject malicious database commands through the message parameter. An attacker with user credentials can craft specially-designed messages to execute arbitrary SQL queries, potentially extracting sensitive data such as user credentials and site configuration details from the underlying database.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-89
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-09 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Single Personal Message 1.0.3 contains an SQL injection vulnerability that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL queries by injecting malicious code through the message parameter. Attackers can access the admin interface and supply crafted SQL statements in the message parameter to extract sensitive database information including user credentials and site configuration data.
5 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
This is a classic SQL injection vulnerability (CWE-89) in the message parameter handling of Single Personal Message 1.0.3. The vulnerability requires prior authentication—an attacker must have valid user credentials to access the message functionality. Once authenticated, unsanitized input is passed directly into SQL queries without proper parameterization or escaping. The attack surface is the admin interface or message submission endpoints, where an attacker can inject SQL fragments to alter query logic and extract, modify, or delete data. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 (HIGH) reflects high confidentiality impact, limited integrity risk, and no availability impact, with a low attack complexity and network-accessible vector.
Business impact
Compromise of user credentials and site configuration data poses significant operational and compliance risk. Attackers gaining access to credential hashes or plaintext passwords can escalate privileges, move laterally to other systems, or launch credential stuffing attacks. Exposure of site configuration may reveal API keys, database connection strings, or other secrets used in the wider infrastructure. For organizations running Single Personal Message as a messaging or collaboration plugin, this creates a persistent insider-threat vector: any compromised user account becomes a pivot point for data exfiltration.
Affected systems
Single Personal Message version 1.0.3 is affected. No patch version information is provided in the source data; organizations running this version should verify against the vendor advisory for available updates or workarounds.
Exploitability
Exploitability is moderate to high in practice. While the vulnerability requires prior authentication (reducing random attack surface), compromised user accounts, insider threats, or weak default credentials are common entry points. Once authenticated, crafting SQL injection payloads is straightforward for an attacker with basic SQL knowledge. No public exploit code or KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerability) status is currently documented, but the simplicity of SQL injection attacks means exploitation could occur quickly if the vulnerability becomes public knowledge.
Remediation
Immediate action: upgrade Single Personal Message to a patched version confirmed by the vendor to address CWE-89 SQL injection. Interim mitigations include: (1) restrict access to the admin interface and message functionality to trusted IP ranges or VPN; (2) implement strict input validation and length limits on the message parameter; (3) use parameterized queries or prepared statements in code (if source access is available); (4) enable database-level query logging to detect suspicious SQL patterns; (5) review user account access and revoke unnecessary administrative privileges.
Patch guidance
Consult the Single Personal Message vendor advisory for available patches. Apply patches to all instances of version 1.0.3 in your environment. If a patched version exists, prioritize testing and deployment within your change management window. If no patch is available, escalate to the vendor for a timeline and implement the interim mitigations listed above.
Detection guidance
Monitor application logs and database query logs for: (1) SQL syntax errors or unusual SQL statements in the message parameter; (2) attempts to access information_schema or system tables; (3) UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, or other common SQL injection payloads in message submissions; (4) database queries executed by the application user with unexpected complexity or access patterns. Implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to block common SQL injection signatures. Enable query auditing on the backend database to flag queries that deviate from expected patterns.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability warrants HIGH priority due to its direct impact on data confidentiality (user credentials and configuration secrets), the ease of exploitation once authenticated, and the potential for lateral movement or privilege escalation. Although authentication is required, the abundance of compromised or weak user credentials in most organizations makes this a realistic attack path. The lack of KEV status suggests it is not yet actively exploited at scale, but prompt patching will close the window before adversaries weaponize it.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 (HIGH) reflects: high confidentiality impact (an attacker can extract sensitive data such as credentials), low integrity impact (the vulnerability allows modification of data but is not the primary attack vector), and no availability impact (the attacker cannot cause denial of service). The attack requires authentication (PR:L) and is network-accessible (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L), making it a practical threat in real deployments. The score appropriately elevates this from MEDIUM to HIGH due to the sensitivity of exfiltrated data.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability affect all versions of Single Personal Message?
No. Only version 1.0.3 is identified as vulnerable in the source data. If you are running a different version, verify with the vendor whether your version is patched. Always check the vendor advisory for a complete version matrix.
Can an unauthenticated attacker exploit this vulnerability?
No. The vulnerability requires valid user credentials to access the message parameter. However, this does not minimize risk: compromised user accounts, insider threats, and weak default credentials are common in many organizations.
What data is at risk if this vulnerability is exploited?
An attacker can extract user credentials (usernames, password hashes, or plaintext passwords depending on storage), site configuration data (database names, API keys, connection strings), and any other data accessible to the database user running the application.
Is there a workaround if a patch is not yet available?
Patches are the permanent solution. In the interim, restrict access to the admin interface and message functionality to a whitelist of trusted IP addresses or require additional authentication layers (e.g., VPN). Enable database query logging to detect exploitation attempts, and implement WAF rules to block SQL injection payloads.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects the vulnerability details and CVSS score as of the publication date (2026-06-09). No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided. Security teams should verify patch availability, affected product versions, and remediation guidance directly with the Single Personal Message vendor. This document does not constitute professional security advice; consult your organization's security team or a qualified vendor for deployment-specific recommendations. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-15. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2016-20062HIGHSQL Injection in Simply Poll 1.4.1 WordPress Plugin - Unauthenticated Data Theft
- CVE-2016-20065HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in Product Catalog 8 WordPress Plugin
- CVE-2017-20243HIGHWordPress Car Park Booking Plugin SQL Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2017-20244HIGHSQL Injection in Wow Forms WordPress Plugin v2.1 – Critical Unauth Database Extraction
- CVE-2017-20245HIGHWow Viral Signups Plugin SQL Injection Vulnerability – Analysis & Patches
- CVE-2017-20246HIGHKittyCatfish 2.2 SQL Injection Vulnerability – WordPress Plugin Security Alert
- CVE-2017-20247HIGHSQL Injection in PICA Photo Gallery 1.0
- CVE-2017-20249HIGHApptha Slider Gallery SQL Injection Vulnerability