MEDIUM 4.1

CVE-2026-42401: Kibana Stored HTML Injection Vulnerability (MEDIUM)

CVE-2026-42401 is a stored HTML injection vulnerability in Kibana that allows an attacker with write access to an Elasticsearch index to inject malicious markup. When other users view the affected Kibana dashboard or visualization, the injected code is not properly sanitized before rendering in their browser. This can enable unauthorized UI changes and cause the victim's browser to make unintended outbound network requests on their behalf.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 4.1 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-79
Affected products
1 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-05-28 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (CWE-79) in Kibana can lead to stored HTML injection. A user with write access to an Elasticsearch index could persist crafted markup which, when subsequently rendered through an affected Kibana view by another user, was not sufficiently sanitized. Successful exploitation could result in unauthorized UI manipulation and outbound network requests issued from the viewing user's browser session.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

This vulnerability stems from improper input neutralization (CWE-79) in Kibana's web page generation logic. An authenticated attacker with write permissions to an Elasticsearch index can craft and store malicious HTML or script content. When a different user retrieves and displays that data through a Kibana view, the application fails to adequately sanitize the markup before rendering it in the DOM. The stored nature of the attack means the payload persists and can affect multiple users over time. The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.1 reflects the requirement for both write-level Elasticsearch access and user interaction (viewing the compromised visualization), though the scope crosses from attacker to victim.

Business impact

Organizations using Kibana for log analysis and monitoring face a session-hijacking and data-integrity risk. An insider or compromised account with Elasticsearch write access could inject content that manipulates dashboards viewed by analysts and security teams, potentially masking alerts, exfiltrating credentials through fake login forms injected into the UI, or triggering credential-stealing requests. The impact is limited to information disclosure and integrity issues rather than availability, but it undermines trust in monitoring and analytics workflows.

Affected systems

This vulnerability affects Kibana deployments connected to vulnerable Elasticsearch instances. Any user or service account with write permissions to an Elasticsearch index can create the stored payload. The vulnerability manifests when other users or authenticated sessions view visualizations, dashboards, or other Kibana views that render data from the compromised index without proper HTML encoding.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires two preconditions: the attacker must possess write access to an Elasticsearch index (typically granted to administrators, data ingest systems, or specific application accounts) and a victim must subsequently view a Kibana visualization or dashboard rendering that data. The attack is not worm-like; it does not propagate without user action. However, the attack surface is broad—any workflow that displays user-supplied data in Kibana is potentially vulnerable. No known public exploit code is documented, and active exploitation appears limited at this time.

Remediation

Organizations should prioritize patching Kibana to a version that properly sanitizes HTML input during page rendering. In the interim, restrict write access to Elasticsearch indices to only necessary service accounts and administrators, implement network segmentation to limit which users can access Kibana, and review access logs for unusual activity. Consider disabling or isolating Kibana instances handling sensitive data until patches are deployed.

Patch guidance

Consult the Elastic security advisory associated with CVE-2026-42401 for the specific patched Kibana versions. Apply patches to all Kibana instances connected to production or sensitive Elasticsearch clusters. Test patches in a staging environment to verify compatibility with custom dashboards and integrations before production rollout. Verify the patch version against the official Elastic advisory to ensure the correct build is deployed.

Detection guidance

Monitor Elasticsearch audit logs for write operations to indices that are subsequently queried by Kibana, especially from unexpected accounts. Search Kibana request logs for unusually encoded or escaped payload patterns in stored documents. Endpoint detection tools should flag any browser processes spawning unexpected child processes or making unusual outbound connections after Kibana page loads. Review Kibana's saved objects (visualizations, dashboards, searches) for suspicious HTML or script content using text pattern matching on index mappings or snapshots.

Why prioritize this

While the CVSS score is moderate (4.1), the vulnerability merits prompt attention because it directly affects security operations workflows. Kibana dashboards are trust points for incident response and threat monitoring. If an attacker can corrupt or manipulate these views, defenders may miss critical alerts or act on false information. The attack also requires only low-privileged write access to Elasticsearch, broadening the threat model. Organizations should prioritize patching based on the sensitivity of data indexed and the criticality of Kibana to their SOC operations.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.1 reflects Attack Vector: Network, Attack Complexity: Low, Privileges Required: Low (write access to Elasticsearch), User Interaction: Required (victim must view the compromised content), Scope: Changed (attacker's actions affect a different user's session), with impacts limited to Integrity (UI manipulation, outbound requests) and no Confidentiality or Availability impact. The moderate score acknowledges that successful exploitation requires both initial compromise of write access and victim interaction, but does not fully capture the reputational and operational risk to security teams relying on Kibana integrity.

Frequently asked questions

Can an attacker with only read access to Elasticsearch exploit this vulnerability?

No. The vulnerability explicitly requires write permissions to persist the malicious markup. Read-only access does not enable exploitation, though users with read access may be victims if they view data containing injected content.

Does this vulnerability allow code execution on the Kibana server or Elasticsearch cluster?

No. The injection occurs in the browser during rendering of the web page. It enables browser-based attacks (session manipulation, credential theft) but not server-side code execution. The attacker cannot compromise Kibana or Elasticsearch infrastructure directly through this flaw.

Will applying network segmentation prevent exploitation?

Partially. Restricting which users can access Kibana reduces the number of potential victims. However, segmentation does not prevent an attacker with valid credentials from injecting content into Elasticsearch or from bypassing Kibana access controls if they have legitimate network access. Patching remains the primary remediation.

How should organizations prioritize patching if they have multiple Kibana instances?

Prioritize instances that index and display user-controlled or externally-sourced data, instances accessed by security or incident response teams, and instances with broad user bases. Instances used for internal infrastructure monitoring may be lower priority if write access is tightly controlled and users are limited to trusted staff.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes and represents SEC.co's technical interpretation of the publicly disclosed vulnerability. The CVSS score, affected products, and patch information are derived from official vendor disclosures and CVE data. Organizations should verify patch availability and compatibility through the Elastic security advisory and conduct testing in a non-production environment before deploying updates. This advisory does not constitute security advice or a recommendation to take specific action without evaluating organizational risk and controls. Consult with internal security and engineering teams to determine appropriate remediation timelines and methods. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).