CVE-2026-41047: qSnapper Snapshot Diff Authentication Bypass (CVSS 5.5)
qSnapper, a snapshot management tool from Presire, contains a missing authentication control in its snapshot diff feature. This allows a local user to view sensitive information that should be restricted, even if they lack normal read permissions. The vulnerability affects versions prior to 1.3.3 and requires local system access to exploit.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-306
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-22 / 2026-07-07
NVD description (verbatim)
Lack of authentication when using the "snapshot diff" functions in qSnapper before version 1.3.3 allowed a local attacker to see otherwise read protected information.
3 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-41047 is an authentication bypass vulnerability (CWE-306) in the snapshot diff functionality of qSnapper. The flaw permits local attackers with limited privileges to access read-protected snapshot data without proper authorization checks. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 score of 5.5 (Medium severity) with a vector indicating local attack vector, low attack complexity, and low privilege requirements. Impact is limited to confidentiality; integrity and availability are not affected.
Business impact
This vulnerability enables local users—including those with restricted access—to view confidential snapshots containing potentially sensitive operational or configuration data. In environments where qSnapper manages snapshots of systems handling PII, financial data, or proprietary information, unauthorized disclosure could result in compliance violations, data loss notifications, or competitive harm. The risk is heightened in multi-tenant or shared hosting scenarios where privilege separation is critical.
Affected systems
The vulnerability affects Presire qSnapper versions before 1.3.3. Organizations should verify their deployment versions and audit which systems run vulnerable instances. This is particularly relevant for teams using qSnapper in environments with multiple user accounts or role-based access controls.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires local system access and the ability to authenticate as a user (even a low-privileged one) on the same system. An attacker cannot exploit this remotely. The attack is straightforward once local access is gained—no complex conditions or timing are required. The absence of dedicated exploit code in the public domain does not reduce the practical risk, as the vulnerability is conceptually simple and could be discovered or weaponized by insiders or local threat actors.
Remediation
Upgrade qSnapper to version 1.3.3 or later. Verify the upgrade against the vendor advisory and confirm that the snapshot diff authentication controls are properly enforced post-deployment. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should restrict local system access through firewall rules, account restrictions, or network segmentation where feasible.
Patch guidance
Presire has released version 1.3.3 to address this vulnerability. Organizations should prioritize deployment in development and test environments first to ensure compatibility with existing snapshots and workflows. After successful testing, roll out updates to production systems. Verify patch installation by confirming the version in qSnapper logs or administrative interfaces and by testing that snapshot diff operations now enforce authentication on previously restricted data.
Detection guidance
Monitor qSnapper logs and audit trails for snapshot diff operations initiated by users with low privilege levels or those lacking explicit snapshot access grants. Implement alerting for any snapshot diff invocations that succeed outside normal operational patterns. Network-based detection is difficult due to the local nature of the attack; focus on endpoint-level log analysis and access control reviews. Consider testing user accounts to confirm that snapshot diff operations are properly denied for users without appropriate permissions.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is medium (5.5), prioritization depends on organizational risk posture. Prioritize remediation if: (1) qSnapper manages snapshots of high-value or regulated data, (2) your environment has multiple local users or shared systems, (3) insider threat is a concern, or (4) compliance frameworks require strong access controls. In single-user or fully trusted environments, remediation can be scheduled normally. The lack of KEV listing indicates this is not yet a weaponized attack in the wild, reducing immediate urgency.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.5 reflects medium severity: local attack requirement and low privilege threshold limit scope, but successful exploitation results in high-impact confidentiality breach. No integrity or availability impact occurs. The score appropriately captures the scenario where an unprivileged local attacker gains unauthorized read access to sensitive snapshots. Organizational impact may be higher depending on snapshot content sensitivity and regulatory context.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability allow remote exploitation?
No. The attack vector is local, meaning an attacker must have or gain local system access to exploit the vulnerability. Remote exploitation is not possible.
Can this be exploited without any credentials?
No. The CVSS vector indicates a low privilege requirement, meaning the attacker must be able to authenticate as a local user on the system, even a restricted one. Unauthenticated access to the system itself is still required.
If we restrict filesystem permissions on snapshots, are we protected?
Not fully. The vulnerability bypasses intended access controls in the qSnapper application layer. Filesystem permissions provide defense-in-depth but should not be relied upon as the sole mitigation. Upgrade to version 1.3.3 to properly fix the authentication check within the diff function.
Is there a workaround if we cannot upgrade immediately?
The most effective interim measure is to restrict local system access through SSH restrictions, account policies, or network segmentation so that only trusted administrators can log in locally. However, this is not a replacement for the patch—upgrade as soon as operationally feasible.
This analysis is based on CVE-2026-41047 details current as of the publication date. Organizations should verify all technical details, patch availability, and version numbers against official Presire vendor advisories before taking action. No exploit code is provided or endorsed. Testing patches in non-production environments is strongly recommended before deployment to production systems. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-28. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10283MEDIUMBottelet DaybydayCRM Authentication Bypass in Settings Handler
- CVE-2026-11238MEDIUMChrome DevTools Memory Disclosure via Malicious Extension
- CVE-2026-11848MEDIUMiRM-IEI Remote Management Missing Authentication Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-25599MEDIUMOrca Heat Pump Unauthenticated HTTP and Stored XSS Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-2675MEDIUMRTI Connext Professional Data Source Spoofing Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-45610MEDIUMWWBN AVideo 2FA CSRF Vulnerability – Cross-Site Account Takeover Risk
- CVE-2026-50082MEDIUMAqara Cloud Developer Portal Missing Authentication - Device Takeover Risk
- CVE-2026-50507MEDIUMWindows BitLocker Authentication Bypass via Physical Access