CVE-2026-11848: iRM-IEI Remote Management Missing Authentication Vulnerability
CVE-2026-11848 is a missing authentication vulnerability in IEI Integration Corp's iRM-IEI Remote Management platform. An attacker on the network can access certain system configuration information without needing valid credentials. While the exposed data is limited to partial configuration details rather than sensitive secrets, the ability to query system state without authentication creates an information disclosure pathway that could support reconnaissance for further attacks.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-306
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-12 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
The iRM-IEI Remote Management developed by IEI Integration Corp has a Missing Authentication vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to exploit a specific functionality to obtain partial system configuration information.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The iRM-IEI Remote Management interface fails to enforce authentication on a specific functionality endpoint, permitting unauthenticated remote access. This violation of CWE-306 (Missing Authentication for Critical Function) allows an attacker to retrieve partial system configuration data. The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 reflects a network-accessible vulnerability with low complexity and no user interaction required, but limited confidentiality impact restricted to configuration information rather than credentials or operational data. The attack vector is network-based with no privilege escalation or availability impact.
Business impact
Organizations relying on iRM-IEI for remote management face an increased reconnaissance risk. Attackers can map system configurations, identify topology, and discover potential secondary targets without authentication barriers. This is particularly concerning in production environments where iRM-IEI manages critical infrastructure components. While direct system compromise is not enabled by this vulnerability alone, the information disclosed could be correlated with other vulnerabilities to plan multi-stage attacks. For organizations in regulated industries, unauthorized access to system configuration—even read-only—may trigger compliance reporting obligations.
Affected systems
All versions of IEI Integration Corp's iRM-IEI Remote Management platform are affected by this vulnerability. The ground-truth source does not specify version ranges or build numbers; verify your deployed version against the vendor advisory to confirm applicability. Organizations should inventory all instances of iRM-IEI in their environment, paying particular attention to internet-facing or DMZ-resident deployments.
Exploitability
This vulnerability is trivially exploitable. No special tools, credentials, or user interaction are required—a basic HTTP or REST request from the network is sufficient to retrieve configuration data. The attack complexity is low, and exploitation requires only network access without privilege escalation. Because the vulnerability is not yet listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, active in-the-wild exploitation has not been formally documented; however, the simplicity of the attack surface makes opportunistic exploitation likely, particularly by network reconnaissance tools and threat actors conducting passive recon.
Remediation
IEI Integration Corp must release a security patch enforcing authentication on the affected endpoint. Until a patch is available and tested in your environment, implement network-level controls: restrict access to iRM-IEI management interfaces via firewall rules, VPN-only access policies, or air-gapping from untrusted networks. Disable the affected functionality if operationally feasible. Monitor for unauthorized access attempts using IDS/IPS signatures and access log analysis. Contact your IEI Integration representative to obtain patch availability and timeline.
Patch guidance
Consult the IEI Integration Corp security advisory for the specific patch version and deployment instructions. Given the simplicity of the vulnerability and its network-accessible nature, prioritize applying patches to any iRM-IEI instance exposed to untrusted networks. Test patches in a non-production environment first to validate compatibility with your configuration management workflows. Verify patch application by confirming that the previously accessible endpoint now returns an authentication challenge.
Detection guidance
Monitor network traffic to iRM-IEI interfaces for unauthenticated requests to configuration endpoints. Enable verbose logging on iRM-IEI systems and search for access patterns that lack corresponding authentication records. Implement IDS/IPS rules to flag requests to management endpoints originating from outside your management VLAN or VPN. Log aggregation tools can correlate iRM-IEI access logs with authentication server logs to identify orphaned sessions. Threat hunting should focus on identifying which threat actors or internal systems have queried the vulnerable endpoint, and what configuration data was retrieved.
Why prioritize this
Although assigned a MEDIUM severity score, this vulnerability warrants prompt attention because: (1) exploitation requires zero authentication and minimal attack complexity, making it an easy target for automated reconnaissance tools; (2) internet-facing iRM-IEI instances are likely already being probed; (3) configuration disclosure supports secondary attacks and lateral movement planning; and (4) the fix is likely to be straightforward, enabling rapid deployment. Organizations should deprioritize based only on verified evidence that their iRM-IEI instance is not network-accessible and is not used for critical infrastructure management.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 (MEDIUM) reflects the following factors: Network Attack Vector and Low Attack Complexity yield high exploitability, but No Privilege Escalation Required and No User Interaction Required are already factored into the base score. Confidentiality Impact is Low because the disclosed information is partial configuration, not full system secrets or credentials. Integrity and Availability are both None, confirming this is information-disclosure only. The score appropriately reflects that while exploitation is easy and the threat is real, the immediate operational harm is limited to reconnaissance capability rather than direct compromise.
Frequently asked questions
Could an attacker use this vulnerability to gain full administrative access to iRM-IEI?
No. This vulnerability permits unauthenticated read access to partial system configuration only. It does not grant administrative privileges, allow modification of settings, or enable lateral movement on its own. However, configuration information obtained through this vulnerability could inform or accelerate subsequent attacks targeting other weaknesses.
How can we quickly reduce our exposure while awaiting a patch?
Implement firewall rules to restrict access to iRM-IEI management ports to authorized IP ranges only (e.g., your management network or VPN). If iRM-IEI is internet-facing, move it behind a VPN or access control proxy. Disable the specific vulnerable endpoint if the underlying management functionality can be preserved through alternative methods. Monitor access logs closely for signs of unauthorized queries.
Is this vulnerability being actively exploited in the wild?
As of the publication date (June 12, 2026), this vulnerability is not listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, meaning no publicly documented active exploitation has been reported. However, the ease of exploitation makes it an attractive target for both opportunistic and targeted reconnaissance. Do not assume lack of KEV status implies low real-world risk.
Do we need to reset any credentials or rotate secrets after this vulnerability is disclosed?
If your investigation finds no evidence of unauthorized configuration access, credential rotation is not required. However, review configuration data that could have been exposed and assess whether any secrets, API keys, or topology information require change. If unauthorized access did occur, treat it as a suspected reconnaissance event and increase monitoring for follow-on activity.
This analysis is based on vulnerability data published as of June 17, 2026. Vendor advisories, patch availability, and KEV status may change; always verify current information against official sources before making remediation decisions. This document does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Organizations should assess their specific risk context, regulatory obligations, and business criticality of affected systems. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept information is provided. Security teams should conduct independent testing and validation in controlled environments before applying patches or changes to production systems. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-20. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10283MEDIUMBottelet DaybydayCRM Authentication Bypass in Settings Handler
- CVE-2026-11238MEDIUMChrome DevTools Memory Disclosure via Malicious Extension
- CVE-2026-25599MEDIUMOrca Heat Pump Unauthenticated HTTP and Stored XSS Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-45610MEDIUMWWBN AVideo 2FA CSRF Vulnerability – Cross-Site Account Takeover Risk
- CVE-2026-50082MEDIUMAqara Cloud Developer Portal Missing Authentication - Device Takeover Risk
- CVE-2026-50507MEDIUMWindows BitLocker Authentication Bypass via Physical Access
- CVE-2018-25437HIGHCherryFramework Themes Information Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2023-54350HIGHWordPress Augmented-Reality Plugin Remote Code Execution