CVE-2026-40711: Dell Container Storage Modules OS Command Injection Vulnerability
Dell Container Storage Modules versions 2.16.0 across four product lines (PowerStore, Unity, PowerFlex, and PowerMax) contain an OS command injection flaw. An attacker with high-level administrative privileges and network access could craft malicious input to execute arbitrary commands on affected systems. This is a serious vulnerability because container storage infrastructure often handles critical data and sits in sensitive network positions.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.0 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-78
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-26 / 2026-06-26
NVD description (verbatim)
Dell Dell Container Storage Modules, version(s) csi-powerstore v2.16.0, csi-unity v2.16.0, csi-powerflex v2.16.0, csi-powermax v2.16.0, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability is rooted in improper neutralization of special characters in OS command construction (CWE-78). When user-supplied input reaches command execution routines without proper sanitization or parameterization, an attacker can inject shell metacharacters to break out of intended command boundaries and execute unintended system commands. The Dell Container Storage Modules (CSI drivers) for PowerStore, Unity, PowerFlex, and PowerMax v2.16.0 fail to adequately filter or escape such input, creating a direct path to code execution with the privileges of the affected module.
Business impact
Container storage modules are foundational to Kubernetes and containerized infrastructure. Compromise enables attackers to pivot within your storage layer, exfiltrate sensitive data, modify or delete stored volumes, and degrade or halt containerized workloads. For organizations relying on Dell storage backends, this threatens business continuity, data integrity, and compliance posture. The requirement for high privilege access somewhat limits blast radius, but administrative credential compromise is a known attack outcome in many breach scenarios.
Affected systems
Dell Container Storage Interface (CSI) drivers for PowerStore v2.16.0, Unity v2.16.0, PowerFlex v2.16.0, and PowerMax v2.16.0 are vulnerable. Organizations using these specific module versions in Kubernetes clusters or OpenShift deployments should prioritize assessment. Verify your deployment versions immediately; if your environment runs these exact versions, assume exposure until patched.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires high privilege access—typically an authenticated admin or service account—and network connectivity to the affected CSI module. An insider threat, or an attacker who has already compromised high-privilege credentials, poses the greatest risk. The relatively high bar to entry (high privilege + remote access + knowledge of vulnerable code paths) reduces opportunistic exploitation risk, but does not eliminate it, especially within compromised environments. The CVSS score reflects this through the High privilege requirement (PR:H) and High complexity (AC:H) factors.
Remediation
Patch all instances of the four affected CSI modules to a version released after v2.16.0. Dell typically publishes patched versions shortly after disclosure; consult Dell's official security advisories for the exact versions that remediate CVE-2026-40711. In the interim, restrict network and administrative access to CSI modules and monitor for suspicious command execution within container storage infrastructure.
Patch guidance
Contact Dell for official patch availability and version numbers. Once available, update your CSI drivers in Kubernetes via Helm charts, operators, or direct manifest updates. Test patches in a staging environment mirroring your production topology to confirm storage functionality and application compatibility. Schedule patching during maintenance windows to minimize disruption to containerized workloads that depend on these storage modules.
Detection guidance
Monitor CSI module logs and Kubernetes audit logs for unusual command execution patterns, especially invocations containing shell metacharacters (|, ;, &, $, backticks) passed to storage-related API calls. Watch for privilege escalation attempts or unexpected process spawning from container storage pods. Network-based detection should flag anomalous connections from CSI components to unusual internal systems. Host-based EDR tools on nodes running CSI modules can detect suspicious child processes.
Why prioritize this
Despite requiring high privilege, this vulnerability is HIGH severity because successful exploitation in a containerized environment can lead to complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability across dependent workloads and data. Container storage is a critical path in modern infrastructure. The recent publication date and specific version pinning make this immediately actionable for vulnerable deployments.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 3.1 score of 8.0 (HIGH) reflects: Network-based attack vector with no authentication to the storage API itself, but requiring high-privilege context; high complexity (AC:H) due to the need for specific input conditions or valid high-privilege credentials; and maximum impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The scope change (S:C) indicates the impact extends beyond the CSI module to the broader system. Organizations should treat this as a priority patch candidate despite the privilege requirement.
Frequently asked questions
What versions of Dell Container Storage Modules are safe?
Only v2.16.0 of PowerStore, Unity, PowerFlex, and PowerMax CSI drivers are confirmed vulnerable. Verify with Dell's security advisory for which patched versions (likely 2.17.0 or later) remediate the issue. Earlier and later versions should be checked against the vendor timeline.
Do I need to take action if I don't run these exact versions?
No, but verify your deployed versions immediately. If you run v2.16.0 of any of the four modules, plan patching urgently. If you're on a different version, cross-reference Dell's advisory to confirm your version is not affected.
Can this be exploited without high privilege credentials?
The vulnerability description specifies high-privilege access is required. An attacker would need valid administrative credentials, compromised service accounts with elevated permissions, or internal access to launch an attack.
Does this affect my data if I patch quickly?
If you patch before exploitation, data and confidentiality are protected. However, if you believe unauthorized access has already occurred on v2.16.0, conduct forensic investigation of storage access logs and consider credential rotation for administrative accounts.
This analysis is based on the CVE disclosure and public information as of the publication date. Verify all patch versions and remediation steps against Dell's official security advisories before implementation. No exploit details are provided. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific network topology, privilege model, and reliance on affected storage modules. SEC.co does not provide vendor-specific patch deployment support; consult Dell support for detailed patching procedures. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-05. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-41265HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host OS Command Injection (CVSS 7.2)
- CVE-2025-41266HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2025-41267HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-41279HIGHOS Command Injection in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host Administration WebUI
- CVE-2025-41281HIGHWaterfall WF-500 OS Command Injection
- CVE-2025-66273HIGHQNAP Command Injection in QTS and QuTS hero
- CVE-2025-66279HIGHQNAP NAS Command Injection – Admin Authentication Required, HIGH Severity
- CVE-2025-69755HIGHNeterbit NW-431F Router RCE and Data Exposure Vulnerability