CVE-2026-40523 FrontAccounting SQL Injection in Audit Trail – High Severity Patch Required
FrontAccounting versions before 2.4.20 contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the Audit Trail report feature. An attacker with basic reporting permissions (SA_GLANALYTIC) can inject malicious SQL commands into report parameters, potentially reading sensitive database records or causing the database to become unresponsive by consuming all available connections. This is a post-authentication risk—the attacker must already have a valid user account—but the permission required is not administrator-level, making it a concern in environments where junior staff or contractors have analytics access.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-89
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-29 / 2026-06-29
NVD description (verbatim)
FrontAccounting before 2.4.20 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the Audit Trail report handler that allows authenticated attackers with SA_GLANALYTIC permission to execute arbitrary SQL queries by injecting malicious code into the PARAM_2 and PARAM_3 POST parameters. Attackers can exploit time-based blind SQL injection through SLEEP() functions that are amplified across JOIN result sets to cause denial of service by exhausting database connections, or extract arbitrary database content through UNION-based injection techniques.
4 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability exists in the Audit Trail report handler where user input in the PARAM_2 and PARAM_3 POST parameters is concatenated into SQL queries without proper sanitization or parameterized query use. An authenticated attacker can leverage both UNION-based injection (to extract data) and time-based blind injection via SLEEP() functions amplified across multiple JOIN operations. The SLEEP amplification technique is particularly dangerous: a single sleep command repeated across a large result set (e.g., thousands of rows) can quickly exhaust database connection pools and trigger denial of service.
Business impact
Compromise of this vulnerability allows unauthorized data exfiltration of financial records, customer information, or other sensitive data stored in the FrontAccounting database. Denial of service attacks can render the accounting system unavailable, blocking invoice generation, payment processing, and financial reporting. In regulated industries, a data breach may trigger notification obligations and compliance penalties. Operational continuity is at risk if database connections are exhausted during business hours.
Affected systems
FrontAccounting installations running versions prior to 2.4.20 are affected. The vulnerability requires the attacker to possess or obtain credentials for a user account with the SA_GLANALYTIC permission (Analytical report access). No specific operating systems or deployment architectures are inherently more vulnerable; risk depends on whether the application is internet-accessible and how broadly the SA_GLANALYTIC role is assigned.
Exploitability
Exploitability is high for insiders or attackers who have obtained valid credentials. The attack requires no special network position (network-accessible), involves no client-side interaction, and uses standard SQL injection techniques that are well-understood and easily automated. However, the attacker must first gain authentication and specifically hold the SA_GLANALYTIC permission, which limits the potential attacker pool compared to unauthenticated vulnerabilities. The SLEEP-based DoS variant is simple to execute and effective at scale.
Remediation
Upgrade FrontAccounting to version 2.4.20 or later. This version addresses the SQL injection by implementing parameterized queries or input validation in the Audit Trail report handler. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict the SA_GLANALYTIC permission to only essential staff, monitor for unusual report queries, and consider implementing Web Application Firewall rules to detect SQL injection patterns in POST parameters targeting the Audit Trail endpoint.
Patch guidance
Verify the availability of FrontAccounting 2.4.20 or later through the official FrontAccounting project repository or vendor advisory. Review release notes to confirm SQL injection remediation is included. Test the patched version in a non-production environment against your reporting workflows before production deployment. Document the patched version in your asset inventory. If using a managed hosting provider, confirm they have applied or will apply the patch on your behalf.
Detection guidance
Monitor database query logs for unusual SLEEP() functions, UNION SELECT statements, or multi-line SQL in audit trail report requests. Check Web Application Firewall or proxy logs for POST requests to the Audit Trail report endpoint containing SQL keywords or comment characters (-- /* */) in PARAM_2 or PARAM_3. Review database connection pool exhaustion events correlated with reports accessed by users with SA_GLANALYTIC rights. Audit access logs to identify which accounts hold SA_GLANALYTIC permission and verify their necessity.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability scores 8.1 (HIGH) because it enables both confidentiality breach (data exfiltration) and availability impact (DoS via connection exhaustion) with low attack complexity and low privilege requirements relative to the sensitive data an accounting system holds. Although authentication is required, SA_GLANALYTIC is not an admin role, expanding the potential attacker pool beyond DBAs. The widespread use of SQL injection techniques and the clarity of the attack path warrant rapid patching, especially if the application is internet-facing or accessible to untrusted networks.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 3.1 score of 8.1 reflects: Attack Vector (Network) – FrontAccenting can be web-accessible; Attack Complexity (Low) – standard SQL injection; Privileges Required (Low) – authenticated user with a non-admin role; User Interaction (None) – direct parameter manipulation; Scope (Unchanged) – impact limited to the database; Confidentiality (High) – arbitrary SQL queries permit data exfiltration; Integrity (None) – the CVE does not document write capability; Availability (High) – SLEEP-amplified DoS exhausts connections. The HIGH severity reflects the combination of data breach and DoS potential in a financial system context.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability require internet access to FrontAccounting?
The vulnerability is exploitable remotely if FrontAccounting is accessible over the network (e.g., via the web interface). If your instance is only accessible on a restricted internal network and you trust all authenticated users, risk is lower; however, credentials can be compromised or stolen, so network segmentation alone is not a complete control.
What is the SA_GLANALYTIC permission, and who typically holds it?
SA_GLANALYTIC grants access to analytical and audit trail reporting features. This permission is often assigned to finance staff, auditors, and managers who need to generate reports but do not require administrative access. Contractors or temporary staff may also hold this role, increasing the exposure surface.
Can I use a Web Application Firewall to block this attack without patching?
A WAF can reduce risk by blocking requests with SQL keywords or suspicious patterns in PARAM_2 and PARAM_3, but it is not a substitute for patching. WAF rules may have false positives or be bypassed with encoding. Patching is the definitive remediation.
What data is most at risk in FrontAccounting?
FrontAccounting typically stores customer data, invoices, payment information, tax records, and general ledger entries. Depending on your configuration, you may also store employee information, supplier details, and bank account references—all high-value targets for fraud or competitive intelligence.
This analysis is provided for educational and authorized security testing purposes only. Do not attempt to exploit this or any vulnerability against systems you do not own or have explicit written permission to test. Actual risk depends on your specific FrontAccounting deployment, user permissions, network architecture, and patch status. Always validate patch applicability against the vendor advisory before applying updates. SEC.co assumes no liability for misuse of this information or for consequential damages from patching or non-patching decisions. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-08. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2016-20062HIGHSQL Injection in Simply Poll 1.4.1 WordPress Plugin - Unauthenticated Data Theft
- CVE-2016-20063HIGHSQL Injection in Single Personal Message 1.0.3 – Credential & Data Theft Risk
- CVE-2016-20065HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in Product Catalog 8 WordPress Plugin
- CVE-2016-20068HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in WordPress Booking Calendar Contact Form 1.0.23
- CVE-2016-20069HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in WordPress Booking Calendar Contact Form 1.0.23
- CVE-2016-20071HIGHCritical SQL Injection in WordPress 404 Redirection Manager Plugin v1.0
- CVE-2016-20072HIGHBBS e-Franchise WordPress Plugin SQL Injection – Remote Data Exfiltration Risk
- CVE-2016-20073HIGHSQL Injection in Answer My Question 1.3 WordPress Plugin