HIGH 8.5

CVE-2026-39581: SQL Injection in WP Sessions Time Monitoring Full Automatic Plugin

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in WP Sessions Time Monitoring Full Automatic plugin version 1.1.4 and earlier. An authenticated attacker with subscriber-level permissions can inject malicious SQL commands through the plugin's input validation, potentially exposing sensitive database information. The vulnerability requires an existing user account but no additional interaction, making it a meaningful risk in multi-user WordPress environments.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 8.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-89
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-16 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

Subscriber SQL Injection in WP Sessions Time Monitoring Full Automatic <= 1.1.4 versions.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-39581 is a subscriber-level SQL injection flaw (CWE-89) affecting WP Sessions Time Monitoring Full Automatic up to version 1.1.4. The plugin fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input before constructing SQL queries, allowing authenticated subscribers to execute arbitrary SQL. The CVSS v3.1 score of 8.5 (HIGH) reflects network accessibility, low attack complexity, and the ability to impact confidentiality across system boundaries, though integrity and availability impact are limited.

Business impact

The vulnerability poses a material risk to WordPress sites using this plugin with multiple user accounts. Attackers with subscriber credentials can access sensitive database content, including user email addresses, authentication tokens, or business-critical data stored in custom tables. On sites hosting confidential information, this could lead to compliance violations (GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA) and reputational harm. The attack requires no special tools or user interaction, increasing the likelihood of exploitation by insiders or compromised low-privilege accounts.

Affected systems

WP Sessions Time Monitoring Full Automatic plugin versions 1.1.4 and earlier are vulnerable. The plugin must be installed and activated on a WordPress site for exposure. Any WordPress installation allowing subscriber-level user registration or account creation is at heightened risk, particularly multi-tenant or community-driven sites. The vulnerability does not affect WordPress core or other plugins unless they depend on this plugin's functionality.

Exploitability

The vulnerability is relatively straightforward to exploit for anyone with valid subscriber credentials. No authentication bypass is required, and standard SQL injection payloads can be crafted to enumerate database structure and extract data. The attack leaves standard query logs, though detection depends on log monitoring practices. Active exploitation is plausible but has not yet been documented in widespread campaigns; the vulnerability was only recently published.

Remediation

Update WP Sessions Time Monitoring Full Automatic to the latest version released after June 2026, which includes input sanitization and parameterized query fixes. Verify against the vendor's advisory that the update addresses CWE-89. As an interim measure, restrict subscriber user registration, audit existing subscriber accounts, and consider disabling the plugin if updates are unavailable or delayed. Apply database access controls and monitor query logs for suspicious SQL patterns.

Patch guidance

Check the official WP Sessions Time Monitoring Full Automatic plugin repository or vendor website for version 1.1.5 or later. Test updates in a staging environment before production deployment. If the vendor has not released a patch, consider uninstalling the plugin and migrating to alternative session monitoring solutions. Verify the patch version in wp-content/plugins/wp-sessions-time-monitoring/readme.txt or the plugin metadata.

Detection guidance

Monitor database logs for SQL injection patterns in queries initiated by subscriber users (watch for UNION, SELECT, OR, SLEEP, or BENCHMARK keywords). Check WordPress debug logs for SQL errors. Use Web Application Firewalls (WAF) to block common SQL injection signatures in HTTP parameters. Query WordPress user metadata for unusual subscriber account creation dates. Audit plugin code with static analysis tools or compare against the patched version to identify input validation gaps.

Why prioritize this

Although not yet in CISA KEV, the vulnerability merits rapid attention because it combines authenticated access (low barrier in open registration environments) with high confidentiality impact and cross-boundary effects (CVSS C:H, S:C). The plugin may be installed on sites with sensitive customer or business data. Early patching prevents exploitation by compromised accounts or malicious insiders and avoids potential regulatory exposure.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 8.5 reflects: Network-accessible attack surface (AV:N), minimal complexity once authenticated (AC:L), low privilege requirement (PR:L), no user interaction needed (UI:N), and scope change allowing impact beyond the vulnerable component (S:C). High confidentiality impact (C:H) drives severity. Limited availability impact (A:L) and no integrity impact (I:N) prevent a critical rating. For organizations hosting PII or regulated data, consider internal risk multipliers that elevate this further.

Frequently asked questions

Do we need subscriber accounts enabled to be vulnerable?

Yes, the vulnerability requires an authenticated subscriber-level user. However, many WordPress sites allow public registration or have service accounts. If your site restricts logins to administrators and editors only, direct risk is lower, but compromised lower-privilege accounts remain a concern.

Will updating the plugin break my existing session data?

Patch releases typically preserve session tables and data integrity. Test in a non-production environment first. If the vendor advisory mentions data migration steps, follow those carefully. Most updates backport security fixes without structural changes.

Can a WAF block this attack entirely?

A WAF with SQL injection rules can reduce risk by filtering malicious payloads in HTTP requests. However, WAF rules may not catch all variants, and the attack occurs at the database layer after plugin processing. WAF is a helpful defense-in-depth measure, not a complete substitute for patching.

Should we disable the plugin until a patch is available?

If the plugin is non-critical and a suitable alternative exists, disabling it eliminates direct risk. If it is essential, combine interim controls: restrict subscriber creation, monitor logs aggressively, and apply WAF rules. Document the decision and set a deadline for patching or replacement.

This analysis is based on published vulnerability data as of June 2026. Patch availability, vendor timelines, and exploit prevalence may change. Verify all patch versions and compatibility with your WordPress environment before deployment. This intelligence does not constitute formal security advice; consult your internal security team and vendor advisories for environment-specific risk decisions. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided or endorsed. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-23. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).