CVE-2026-32833: Cudy LT300 Firmware OS Command Injection Vulnerability
The Cudy LT300 router running firmware versions before 2.5.12 contains a command injection flaw in its time-configuration interface. An attacker who has gained valid credentials to the device can inject shell commands through the NTP settings, allowing them to execute arbitrary code with system privileges. This transforms a low-barrier authenticated access point into a full device compromise.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-78
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-26 / 2026-06-29
NVD description (verbatim)
Cudy LT300 3.0 running firmware prior to version 2.5.12 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands by injecting shell metacharacters into the cbid.system.ntp.current POST parameter in the system time configuration interface. Attackers can submit malicious payloads through the NTP settings endpoint to achieve remote code execution on the underlying system.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-32833 is an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) in the Cudy LT300 3.0 firmware. The vulnerability exists in the system time configuration endpoint, specifically in the cbid.system.ntp.current POST parameter. The parameter does not properly sanitize shell metacharacters before passing user input to system command execution routines. An authenticated attacker can craft a malicious POST request containing shell metacharacters (such as backticks, pipe operators, or semicolons) to break out of the intended command context and execute arbitrary OS-level commands. The injection occurs at the system level, not within a sandboxed application context, meaning successful exploitation grants the attacker the same privileges as the service running the vulnerable code—typically root or equivalent on embedded Linux systems.
Business impact
Compromise of a Cudy LT300 router exposes all traffic passing through it, enables lateral movement into the local network, and can be used as a pivot point for attacks on connected devices. For organizations using these routers as edge or branch office equipment, exploitation could lead to data exfiltration, network reconnaissance, malware distribution, or establishment of persistent backdoors. The requirement for authentication lowers but does not eliminate risk in environments where credential compromise, guest networks, or social engineering are realistic threat vectors.
Affected systems
Cudy LT300 3.0 devices running firmware versions prior to 2.5.12 are vulnerable. Organizations should inventory any Cudy LT300 routers in production, verify current firmware versions through the device management interface or system logs, and prioritize those running outdated firmware for immediate attention.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires valid authentication credentials to the device's web or management interface. No network-level authentication is needed—only login access. Once authenticated, the attack is straightforward: a single POST request with injected metacharacters in the NTP parameter is sufficient. The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 (HIGH) reflects this relatively low barrier to exploitation combined with full system compromise potential. The vulnerability is not known to be actively exploited in the wild and has not been added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.
Remediation
Upgrade all affected Cudy LT300 devices to firmware version 2.5.12 or later. The patch is the sole remediation; there is no workaround. Until patching is complete, restrict administrative access to the device to trusted personnel and networks, disable remote management if not actively required, and monitor for unauthorized configuration changes.
Patch guidance
Download the latest firmware (2.5.12 or newer) from Cudy's support portal or directly through the device's firmware update interface. Most Cudy devices allow in-band firmware updates via the administrative dashboard. Verify the checksum of the downloaded image if provided by the vendor. Schedule updates during maintenance windows to avoid service disruption. After update, confirm successful deployment by checking the firmware version in system settings and validating that time synchronization functions normally. Consider a device reboot after update if the process does not automatically trigger one.
Detection guidance
Monitor for POST requests to NTP or time-configuration endpoints on Cudy devices, especially those containing shell metacharacters (backticks, pipe characters |, semicolons, dollar signs with parentheses, or ampersands) in parameter values. Intrusion detection systems (IDS) and web application firewalls (WAF) should flag attempts to inject these characters into the cbid.system.ntp.current parameter. Review device logs for unexpected system commands executed by the web service process or for privilege escalation events immediately following NTP configuration changes. Authenticate to vulnerable devices periodically and check system logs for evidence of unauthorized command execution or configuration tampering.
Why prioritize this
Although the vulnerability requires authentication, the complete system compromise that results—coupled with the ubiquity of Cudy devices in small business and SOHO environments—makes patching a high priority. The NTP interface is a standard, accessible feature, and an authenticated attacker (internal employee, compromised guest account, or credential-stuffed admin) can achieve code execution silently. Prioritize patching of any Cudy LT300 units exposed to less-trusted networks or used in security-sensitive deployments.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects HIGH severity: network-accessible vector, low attack complexity, low privilege requirement (just authentication), no user interaction needed, and impact spanning confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. The score does not diminish despite authentication being required because valid credentials are often obtainable through phishing, credential leaks, or insider threats. The absence of active exploitation in the wild keeps this out of the KEV list but does not reduce its inherent danger.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely without being on the same network as the device?
Exploitation requires authentication to the device's management interface. If that interface is exposed to the internet (not recommended), then yes—remote exploitation is possible with valid credentials. However, if the management interface is restricted to the local network only (the typical and recommended configuration), exploitation would require an attacker to first gain network access to the local segment or compromise a system already on that network.
Does updating the firmware erase my router configuration?
Firmware updates on Cudy devices typically preserve configuration by default, but this behavior can vary. Before updating, back up your configuration through the device settings if the option is available, or document key settings (SSID, security mode, port forwarding, etc.) in case a clean install is needed. Consult Cudy's release notes for the specific version you are deploying.
Is this vulnerability being actively exploited?
There is currently no evidence of active exploitation in the wild. The vulnerability has not been added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. However, the relative simplicity of the attack and the likelihood of authentication credentials being available in many environments means organizations should not rely on lack of current exploitation as a reason to delay patching.
What should I do if I suspect my Cudy LT300 has been compromised?
Immediately isolate the device from the network if possible. Check system logs for evidence of unauthorized commands or unexpected process execution. Consider a factory reset if logs show signs of tampering. Restore from a known-good configuration backup if available, then apply the latest firmware. Review any systems that were connected to the router for signs of compromise or data exfiltration. If data sensitivity is high, engage incident response or forensics support.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and is based on publicly disclosed vulnerability details as of the publication date. While we strive for accuracy, SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or correctness of this information. Organizations are responsible for independently verifying patch availability, testing patches in non-production environments, and assessing the applicability of this vulnerability to their specific systems and configurations. Consult official Cudy security advisories and vendor documentation for authoritative guidance. This summary does not constitute legal, compliance, or professional security advice; engage qualified security professionals for remediation planning in regulated or mission-critical environments. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-05. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-41265HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host OS Command Injection (CVSS 7.2)
- CVE-2025-41266HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2025-41267HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-41279HIGHOS Command Injection in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host Administration WebUI
- CVE-2025-41281HIGHWaterfall WF-500 OS Command Injection
- CVE-2025-66273HIGHQNAP Command Injection in QTS and QuTS hero
- CVE-2025-66279HIGHQNAP NAS Command Injection – Admin Authentication Required, HIGH Severity
- CVE-2025-69755HIGHNeterbit NW-431F Router RCE and Data Exposure Vulnerability