CVE-2026-24699: Cisco RV130/RV110W OS Command Injection Vulnerability
A command injection flaw in Cisco's small business routers (RV130, RV130W, and RV110W) allows authenticated administrators to inadvertently execute arbitrary system commands with root privileges by manipulating the LAN IPv6 prefix length configuration parameter. An attacker with administrative access could leverage this to compromise the entire router and potentially the networks it protects.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.2 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-78
- Affected products
- 7 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-08 / 2026-07-10
NVD description (verbatim)
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the sub_34984() function of the "rc" binary in Cisco RV130/RV130W with firmware 1.0.3.55 and RV110W routers with firmware 1.2.2.5 / 1.2.2.8. The lan_ipv6_prefixlen configuration parameter is not properly sanitized, which could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-24699 is an OS command injection vulnerability in the sub_34984() function within the "rc" binary used by Cisco RV130, RV130W, and RV110W routers. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input sanitization of the lan_ipv6_prefixlen configuration parameter. Because the parameter is passed to a system call without proper escaping or validation, an authenticated attacker can inject shell metacharacters to execute arbitrary OS commands. The vulnerability runs in the context of the root user, granting complete system compromise. The CWE-78 classification (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command) directly maps to classic command injection patterns.
Business impact
For organizations operating Cisco RV small business routers as edge gateways or branch office connectivity points, this vulnerability creates a path to full device compromise by privileged insiders or attackers who have obtained administrative credentials. Since these routers often serve as the perimeter security boundary, successful exploitation could enable lateral movement into internal networks, data exfiltration, man-in-the-middle attacks, or denial of service. The HIGH severity rating reflects the convergence of root-level code execution with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Affected systems
The vulnerability affects Cisco RV130 and RV130W routers running firmware version 1.0.3.55, and Cisco RV110W routers running firmware versions 1.2.2.5 or 1.2.2.8. Organizations should conduct an inventory of deployed models and firmware revisions to identify exposure. Cisco's product lifecycle and support status for these small business devices should be verified to determine patch availability timelines.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires authenticated administrative access to the router's management interface. The attack vector is network-based with no user interaction required once credentials are obtained. The low complexity (AC:L) indicates the attack does not depend on race conditions, specialized configurations, or environmental factors—a straightforward parameter modification suffices. However, the requirement for high-privilege authentication (PR:H) significantly limits the attack surface; threats are primarily internal misuse, compromised management credentials, or attackers who have already breached adjacent systems.
Remediation
Firmware updates from Cisco will contain input validation and sanitization fixes for the lan_ipv6_prefixlen parameter. Until patches are applied, restrict administrative access through network segmentation, strong authentication policies (including multi-factor authentication if supported), and regular audits of who holds administrative credentials. Consider disabling IPv6 configuration features if not in use and review router access logs for suspicious parameter modifications.
Patch guidance
Monitor Cisco security advisories and product update pages for firmware releases addressing this CVE. Verify the specific firmware version numbers in the vendor advisory before deployment. Test patches in a non-production environment first, as firmware updates to network edge devices carry operational risk. Schedule patching during maintenance windows to minimize network disruption. Document baseline configurations before and after updates to catch any unintended behavioral changes.
Detection guidance
Monitor router management interface logs for authentication events and configuration changes involving IPv6 settings, particularly the lan_ipv6_prefixlen parameter. Look for suspicious patterns such as encoded shell metacharacters (%, $, backticks, parentheses) in configuration parameter values. Network intrusion detection systems (IDS) may flag command injection attempts in HTTP/HTTPS traffic to the router's management interface. Consider deploying syslog forwarding from the router to a centralized security information and event management (SIEM) system to improve visibility.
Why prioritize this
Although the vulnerability requires administrative credentials and is not on the CISA KEV list, the HIGH CVSS score and potential for root-level command execution warrant prompt attention. Organizations using these routers as network perimeter devices should prioritize patching, as successful exploitation enables full network compromise. The risk is elevated if administrative credentials are shared, reused across systems, or managed through weak processes.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 (HIGH) reflects: (1) network-based attack vector with no physical access required; (2) low attack complexity—straightforward parameter injection; (3) high-privilege requirement, which limits but does not eliminate risk; (4) complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability; and (5) scope unchanged (impact limited to the router itself, not the broader system). The score appropriately emphasizes the severity of root-level code execution while accounting for the authentication barrier.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to patch if administrative credentials are protected and access to the management interface is restricted?
Yes. While credential protection and access controls reduce risk, they do not eliminate it. Insider threats, credential compromise, and supply-chain attack scenarios remain plausible. Patching removes the underlying vulnerability entirely and is the definitive remediation.
Does this vulnerability affect Cisco RV devices with firmware versions older than those listed?
The vulnerability is confirmed in the firmware versions specified (RV130/RV130W 1.0.3.55 and RV110W 1.2.2.5/1.2.2.8). Older versions may or may not contain the same flaw depending on when the vulnerable code was introduced. Verify your firmware version against Cisco advisories and contact Cisco support if your version is not explicitly mentioned.
Can we detect exploit attempts in real-time?
Detection is challenging without deep packet inspection and knowledge of the exact parameter encoding methods an attacker might use. Monitoring administrative access logs, configuration change events, and unusual command execution on the router is more reliable. Enable all available logging features and forward logs to a SIEM for correlation and alerting.
What is the difference between the RV110W and RV130/RV130W models in terms of this vulnerability?
All three models are affected by the same command injection flaw in the sub_34984() function, but different firmware versions are vulnerable. The RV110W requires versions 1.2.2.5 or 1.2.2.8, while the RV130 and RV130W require version 1.0.3.55. Patch availability and timelines may differ; check Cisco advisories for each model separately.
This analysis is based on the published CVE description and CVSS vector as of the date indicated. Exploit code is not provided. Organizations must verify all patch versions, firmware details, and vendor guidance directly against official Cisco security advisories before implementing remediation. This content is for informational purposes and should not be construed as legal or compliance advice. Consult your security team and vendor documentation for definitive risk assessment and remediation timelines. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-17. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-24697HIGHCisco RV130/RV110W Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-24698HIGHCisco RV130/RV110W Command Injection
- CVE-2026-24700HIGHCisco RV130/RV110W OS Command Injection—Admin Authentication Required
- CVE-2025-41265HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host OS Command Injection (CVSS 7.2)
- CVE-2025-41266HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2025-41267HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-41279HIGHOS Command Injection in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host Administration WebUI
- CVE-2025-41281HIGHWaterfall WF-500 OS Command Injection