CVE-2026-2053: WSO2 API Manager WS-Addressing SSRF Vulnerability
WSO2 API Manager contains a vulnerability in how it processes WS-Addressing headers—a standard part of SOAP web service communications. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user-controlled input within these headers. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this by crafting malicious WS-Addressing headers that trick the API Manager into making requests to arbitrary destinations. This effectively turns the API Manager into a proxy for attacker-controlled network reconnaissance and access attempts, potentially exposing internal resources that should be isolated from external networks.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.3 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-918
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-26 / 2026-06-27
NVD description (verbatim)
The WSO2 API Manager's message flow component, when processing WS-Addressing headers, does not sufficiently validate or restrict user-controlled input within these headers. This omission allows an attacker to manipulate WS-Addressing headers to specify arbitrary destinations for server-initiated requests. Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated attacker to control the destination of server-initiated requests originating from the WSO2 API Manager. This direct control can enable unauthorized access to internal network resources or services that would typically be inaccessible from external networks.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-2053 is a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the WSO2 API Manager's message flow component. The vulnerability exists because the application fails to properly validate or constrain the destination addresses specified in WS-Addressing headers before initiating server-side requests. WS-Addressing is a W3C standard for routing SOAP messages, but in this case, the implementation does not enforce allowlists, network segmentation policies, or other restrictions on where requests may be sent. An unauthenticated attacker can submit a crafted SOAP message with a malicious WS-Addressing header (such as a ReplyTo or FaultTo endpoint) to direct the API Manager to connect to an internal IP address, private service, or attacker-controlled server. The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 score of 8.3 (HIGH) due to the combination of network accessibility (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication requirement (PR:N), and changed scope (S:C), which means impact extends beyond the vulnerable component itself.
Business impact
This vulnerability poses a direct risk to organizations running WSO2 API Manager as their primary API gateway or SOAP/web service intermediary. An attacker can use the API Manager to scan and probe internal networks, access backend databases or microservices that should only be reachable internally, and potentially extract sensitive data or trigger unwanted actions on internal systems. If the API Manager has network access to database servers, caching layers, configuration management systems, or other backend infrastructure, those systems become targets. The attack requires no authentication, making it accessible to any network-adjacent or internet-connected attacker. For organizations using API Manager in a DMZ or edge position, this is particularly critical because it bridges the perimeter with internal resources.
Affected systems
WSO2 API Manager (version information not specified in available data; verify against vendor advisory) is the affected product. The vulnerability affects deployments regardless of the specific backend services or APIs managed by the instance, as the flaw is in the message flow processing layer itself. Any WSO2 API Manager instance exposed to network traffic or processing untrusted SOAP messages is at risk. Organizations should consult the WSO2 security advisory for the exact affected versions and the corresponding patch versions.
Exploitability
Exploitability is high. The attack requires no authentication, has low complexity, and is network-accessible. An attacker needs only to send a specially crafted SOAP message with a malicious WS-Addressing header to the API Manager endpoint. No user interaction is required, and the attack can be automated. The barrier to exploitation is primarily the attacker's knowledge of the target's network topology or the discovery of internal services to target. This is not currently listed on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, but the straightforward nature of the attack means exploitation could emerge rapidly once public proof-of-concept details or scanning tools become available.
Remediation
Organizations must apply the security patch provided by WSO2 as soon as possible. Immediate interim mitigations include: (1) restricting network access to the API Manager to trusted clients and networks using firewall rules or network segmentation; (2) disabling or restricting SOAP or WS-Addressing message processing if not actively required; (3) implementing intrusion detection or prevention rules that flag suspicious WS-Addressing ReplyTo/FaultTo endpoints pointing to internal IP ranges or unexpected destinations. These mitigations reduce attack surface but do not eliminate the vulnerability itself.
Patch guidance
Apply the security update released by WSO2 for CVE-2026-2053. The specific patch version and applicable API Manager versions should be verified directly from the WSO2 security advisory (https://wso2.com/security or their official security channels). Testing in a non-production environment before deployment is strongly recommended. Organizations running WSO2 API Manager should prioritize this patch given the HIGH severity rating and the ease of exploitation. Verify that your current version is within the affected range and that the patch addresses the WS-Addressing header validation issue.
Detection guidance
Monitor API Manager logs and traffic for: (1) SOAP messages with WS-Addressing headers containing ReplyTo or FaultTo endpoints that point to internal IP addresses (RFC 1918 ranges: 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16), localhost, or unexpected external domains; (2) unusual outbound connections initiated by the API Manager process to atypical destinations; (3) error messages or exceptions related to message routing or addressing failures. Network-based detection should flag any requests from the API Manager to private IP ranges. Enable detailed logging of WS-Addressing header content if available in your deployment.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate prioritization due to its HIGH CVSS score (8.3), lack of authentication requirements, network accessibility, and the potential for lateral movement into internal networks. The changed scope (S:C) indicates that compromise could affect systems beyond the API Manager itself. Given that it is not yet on the KEV list, early patching positions your organization ahead of public exploit development. The risk is compounded if your API Manager is internet-facing or accessible from untrusted networks.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS v3.1 score of 8.3 reflects: Attack Vector (Network) — the flaw is remotely exploitable; Attack Complexity (Low) — no special conditions or timing needed; Privileges Required (None) — unauthenticated access; User Interaction (None) — fully automated; Scope (Changed) — the vulnerability impacts resources beyond the vulnerable API Manager component (internal backend systems). The Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability impacts are all rated Low, but the combination of easy exploitation, broad reach, and cross-boundary impact justifies the HIGH severity classification. The score correctly captures the risk posed by SSRF-class vulnerabilities in gateway positions.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited without sending traffic to the API Manager?
No. An attacker must send a crafted SOAP request containing a malicious WS-Addressing header to the API Manager endpoint itself. The vulnerability manifests when the API Manager processes that request and attempts to honor the attacker-specified destination. Passive network monitoring alone will not trigger exploitation.
Does this affect API Manager instances that do not process SOAP or WS-* messages?
Unlikely, but verify your configuration. The vulnerability is specific to the message flow component's handling of WS-Addressing headers. If your API Manager is configured to process only REST APIs and does not route SOAP messages, you may have reduced exposure. However, if any traffic passes through the message flow component and header validation is bypassed, risk remains. Review your routing policies and message handlers.
What is the difference between this and a typical SSRF vulnerability?
The attack vector is WS-Addressing headers rather than URL parameters or Host headers, and the vulnerable component is API Manager's SOAP/web service message processing. The underlying flaw is the same — insufficient validation of attacker-controlled destination input — but the exploit method and affected systems are specific to WS-* standards and message-oriented architectures.
If this is not on the KEV list, how urgent is patching?
KEV status does not determine urgency; CVSS score, attack complexity, and authentication requirements do. A HIGH-severity, unauthenticated, network-accessible flaw should be treated as urgent regardless of KEV listing. Patch as part of your normal critical/high remediation cycle, typically within 7–14 days for internet-facing systems.
This analysis is based on publicly available vulnerability data current as of June 2026. Patch versions, affected version ranges, and specific remediation steps must be verified against the official WSO2 security advisory. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific deployment, network topology, and use of WSO2 API Manager. This document does not constitute professional security advice and should be reviewed by qualified security personnel. Test all patches in non-production environments before production deployment. No exploit code or detailed proof-of-concept information is provided herein. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-04. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-53828HIGHServer-Side Request Forgery in SharePoint for ownCloud Enables Admin Code Execution
- CVE-2026-10055HIGHEclipse Theia SSRF Vulnerability in /services/request-service
- CVE-2026-10068HIGHSSRF in Shibby Tomato 1.28 miniupnpd (Unmaintained)
- CVE-2026-10107HIGHMoviePilot v2 SSRF in Image Proxy Allows Internal Network Access
- CVE-2026-10129HIGHIBM Langflow OSS SSRF Bypass via Redirect Following – HIGH Risk
- CVE-2026-10280HIGHServer-Side Request Forgery in Horizon921 mcpilot 0.1.0
- CVE-2026-10287HIGHSSRF in SourceCodester SEO Meta Tag Extractor 1.0
- CVE-2026-10546HIGHIBM Langflow OSS SSRF via TOCTOU Race Condition