CVE-2026-20257: Splunk Dashboard Data Exfiltration via Style Attribute Bypass
A vulnerability in Splunk Enterprise and Splunk Cloud Platform allows a low-privileged user to create a malicious dashboard that can steal sensitive data from higher-privileged users who view it. The attack works by bypassing security controls on dashboard styling, enabling the dashboard to send data to external websites. However, the attacker cannot trigger the theft automatically—they must trick a target into visiting the dashboard, typically through phishing. Once the target views it, their browser could leak information to attacker-controlled servers.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.7 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-20
- Affected products
- 2 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-10 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, and 9.3.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.3.2512.13, 10.2.2510.15, 10.1.2507.23, and 9.3.2411.132, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could craft a classic dashboard that exfiltrates sensitive data from the browser of a higher-privileged user who views it. The exfiltration is possible because classic dashboard panels do not fully validate style attribute values, which can allow for requests to reach external domains outside the configured Trusted Domains List. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The low-privileged user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-20257 is an insufficient input validation flaw (CWE-20) in classic dashboard panel styling. Splunk Enterprise and Cloud Platform fail to properly sanitize style attribute values in dashboard definitions, allowing them to reference external domains that circumvent the Trusted Domains List. The vulnerability requires a logged-in user with less than admin or power role privileges to craft the malicious dashboard, and requires user interaction (clicking a link, opening a dashboard URL) to trigger exfiltration. The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.7 (Medium) reflects the confidentiality risk paired with the requirement for social engineering and low attacker privilege level.
Business impact
Organizations running Splunk for log aggregation, security analytics, or operational monitoring face a data exfiltration risk if low-privileged users (e.g., content creators, analysts in restricted roles) are compromised or act maliciously. Sensitive query results, metrics, or logs displayed in dashboards could be stolen if a high-privileged user (admin, power role) is social engineered into viewing a malicious dashboard. This risk scales with the sensitivity of data stored in Splunk and the trust users place in internal dashboard links shared by colleagues.
Affected systems
Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, and 9.3.13 are vulnerable. Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.3.2512.13, 10.2.2510.15, 10.1.2507.23, and 9.3.2411.132 are affected. Organizations must determine which version families are in use, as patching paths differ by major release line. Verify exact version numbers against the vendor advisory to confirm exposure.
Exploitability
Exploitation is not trivial. An attacker needs valid Splunk credentials with at least viewer-level access, the ability to create or modify classic dashboards (granted to various non-admin roles), and a social engineering vector to deliver the malicious dashboard URL to a higher-privileged target. The attacker cannot passively trigger exfiltration; the victim must actively open or interact with the dashboard. This makes opportunistic, mass exploitation unlikely, but targeted attacks against high-value users remain feasible.
Remediation
Update Splunk Enterprise to 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, or 9.3.13 depending on your current release line. Update Splunk Cloud Platform to 10.3.2512.13, 10.2.2510.15, 10.1.2507.23, or 9.3.2411.132 as appropriate. Verify patch version numbers and availability in the official Splunk security advisory. Coordinate with Splunk support or your cloud tenant manager for timing, as Cloud updates may be vendor-managed.
Patch guidance
Patches are available from Splunk. Determine your current Enterprise or Cloud version using the About page in Splunk Web (Settings > System Information). Cross-reference against the advisory to identify the correct patch version for your release line. Cloud Platform customers should coordinate with Splunk for deployment timing. Enterprise customers should schedule patching during a maintenance window to avoid disruption to searches and dashboards. Test patches in a non-production environment before deployment.
Detection guidance
Monitor for suspicious classic dashboard creation or modification by low-privileged users, particularly dashboards referencing external style attributes or domains not on the Trusted Domains List. Review dashboard audit logs for unusual activity. Inspect dashboard XML/JSON definitions for style attributes pointing to external hosts. Monitor egress traffic from Splunk infrastructure for unexpected external connections initiated by dashboard rendering. Implement network controls (firewall, proxy rules) to block unauthorized external domain access from Splunk instances.
Why prioritize this
This is a Medium-severity vulnerability requiring social engineering, but it directly threatens confidentiality of sensitive operational and security data stored in Splunk. Organizations with high-value intelligence in Splunk (security incident logs, customer data, intellectual property metrics) should prioritize patching to prevent targeted exfiltration. However, the user-interaction requirement and low attacker privilege level mean it is lower urgency than unauthenticated or easily triggered flaws.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.7 (Medium) reflects: (1) network-based attack vector with low complexity; (2) low privilege requirement (non-admin user); (3) requirement for user interaction (UI:R); (4) high confidentiality impact (C:H) but no integrity or availability impact; (5) unchanged scope (S:U). The score appropriately penalizes the social engineering requirement while crediting the sensitivity of data at risk.
Frequently asked questions
Can a low-privileged user steal data without the victim's knowledge?
No. The attacker must trick the victim into opening or interacting with the malicious dashboard, typically via phishing or by masquerading as a trusted colleague. The vulnerability does not enable passive or automatic exfiltration; it requires the victim to actively view the dashboard.
Does this affect Splunk instances behind a firewall or not exposed to untrusted users?
Risk is reduced but not eliminated. If your Splunk instance is internal-only and user accounts are tightly controlled, the attack surface is smaller. However, a disgruntled insider or compromised account could still create a malicious dashboard and social engineer peers. Review access controls and dashboard modification permissions regardless of network topology.
What should we do while waiting for patches to deploy?
Immediately audit and restrict dashboard creation/modification permissions to trusted users only. Review audit logs for suspicious dashboard activity. Implement network-level controls to block unexpected external domain requests from Splunk. Educate users about phishing risks related to Splunk dashboard links. Plan and schedule patch deployment for each affected system.
Are Splunk Cloud customers affected differently than Enterprise customers?
Both are vulnerable, but patch timelines differ. Splunk Cloud Platform patches are applied by Splunk on your tenant; coordinate with your account team for ETA. Enterprise customers must deploy patches themselves. Cloud customers should still inventory their version and confirm it is below the listed thresholds.
This analysis is based on public vulnerability data as of June 2026. Patch availability, version numbers, and specific technical details should be verified against the official Splunk Security Advisory. This explainer does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Organizations should consult with their security and legal teams regarding remediation timelines and risk tolerance. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-19. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-20254MEDIUMSplunk CSS Injection Enables Credential Exfiltration via Malicious Dashboards
- CVE-2026-20255MEDIUMSplunk Dashboard URL Validation Bypass – Data Exfiltration Risk
- CVE-2026-20256MEDIUMSplunk Dashboard URL Validation Vulnerability – Protocol-Relative URL Bypass
- CVE-2025-5089MEDIUMArista EOS/CVX DoS via Malformed Messages
- CVE-2025-5090MEDIUMCVX CVE-2025-5090: Input Validation Flaw Leads to Agent Crashes and Denial of Service
- CVE-2026-0018MEDIUMAndroid AccessibilityManagerService Denial of Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0051MEDIUMAndroid UBSan Runtime Denial of Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0070MEDIUMAndroid DevicePolicyManagerService Local Denial of Service Vulnerability