CVE-2026-14809: SQL Injection in Prog Management System – High Severity Remote Code Execution Risk
A SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the Prog Management System developed by PROG MIS. The vulnerability allows attackers without credentials to send specially crafted requests that execute unauthorized SQL commands directly against the system's database. This enables attackers to read sensitive data stored in the database. The vulnerability requires no authentication, no special user interaction, and can be exploited over the network.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-89
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-06 / 2026-07-06
NVD description (verbatim)
Prog Management System developed by PROG MIS has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read database contents.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-14809 is a remote SQL Injection vulnerability (CWE-89) in Prog Management System. The application fails to properly sanitize or parameterize user-supplied input before incorporating it into SQL queries. An unauthenticated remote attacker can craft malicious SQL syntax in request parameters or payloads to break out of the intended query context and execute arbitrary SQL commands. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflects high confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability compromise, indicating this is primarily a data exfiltration risk. The attack vector is network-based with low attack complexity and no privileges required.
Business impact
Unauthorized database access poses a direct threat to confidential information. Customer data, financial records, proprietary business information, or personally identifiable information stored in the Prog Management System's database could be exfiltrated without detection. This creates risk of data breach notification obligations, regulatory fines under GDPR or similar frameworks, reputational damage, and loss of customer trust. The lack of authentication barriers means threat actors can initiate attacks from anywhere without insider knowledge or credentials.
Affected systems
The Prog Management System developed by PROG MIS is affected. Consult vendor documentation to identify specific product versions, deployment models (on-premises vs. cloud), and whether your organization runs this software. No vendor patch information or version details are currently available in public advisories.
Exploitability
This vulnerability is readily exploitable. No authentication is required, the attack is straightforward to execute, and network access is sufficient. Public tools for SQL injection testing can be adapted by threat actors. However, the vulnerability is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, suggesting active exploitation in the wild has not yet been confirmed by authorities, though this does not guarantee safety.
Remediation
Contact PROG MIS immediately for patch availability and guidance. Implement input validation and parameterized queries (prepared statements) to prevent SQL injection. Apply the vendor patch as soon as it becomes available. In the interim, deploy Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block common SQL injection patterns. Restrict network access to the Prog Management System to trusted networks only. Conduct a forensic review of database access logs to identify any unauthorized query execution since the system was deployed.
Patch guidance
No patch version information is available at this time. Verify the current version of your Prog Management System installation and check PROG MIS's official advisory channels, support portal, or security bulletins for patch release details. Apply patches promptly in a controlled testing environment before production deployment. Given the high exploitability, patching should be prioritized.
Detection guidance
Monitor database query logs for unusual SQL syntax, UNION-based queries, or time-delay patterns indicative of SQL injection probing. Review web server access logs for requests containing SQL keywords or encoded payloads (e.g., URL-encoded single quotes, SQL comments). Enable detailed logging on the Prog Management System application layer. Use intrusion detection signatures specific to SQL injection. Query firewall and IDS/IPS logs for attempts to access administrative database functions or unauthorized schema queries.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability warrants immediate attention due to high CVSS severity (7.5), ease of exploitation (no authentication required), and significant confidentiality impact. The lack of active exploitation in KEV does not reduce urgency. Any organization running Prog Management System should treat patching and interim controls as critical path items.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflects the combination of network-accessible attack surface (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privilege requirement (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and high confidentiality impact (C:H). The score appropriately emphasizes data breach risk while acknowledging that integrity and availability are not directly compromised by this SQL injection variant. This is a 'read-only' exfiltration risk rather than a system takeover vector.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to be running a particular version of Prog Management System to be vulnerable?
Currently, no version-specific information has been released. Until PROG MIS publishes advisory details, assume all versions may be affected. Contact your vendor immediately to confirm which versions are in scope and when patches will be available.
Can attackers modify or delete data with this vulnerability, or just read it?
Based on the technical assessment, this SQL injection vulnerability allows reading database contents (confidentiality impact). The CVSS vector indicates no integrity or availability impact, suggesting update and delete operations are not a direct risk. However, do not assume this limitation holds forever—request full impact clarification from PROG MIS.
If we block SQL keywords at the firewall, will that protect us?
Keyword-based firewall rules may slow down naive attacks but are not a reliable defense. Attackers use encoding, comment tricks, and alternative syntax to bypass simple filters. A WAF with SQL injection-specific rules is more effective, but patching remains the only durable fix.
What should we do if we discover unauthorized SQL queries in our logs?
Treat this as a potential data breach. Isolate the affected system, preserve logs as evidence, determine the scope of data accessed, notify your legal and compliance teams, and engage incident response. A forensic review of database access patterns is essential.
This analysis is based on publicly available information as of 2026-07-06. Vendor patch details, affected version ranges, and exploitation status may evolve. Organizations should verify compatibility and test patches in non-production environments before deployment. SEC.co provides this intelligence for informational purposes and does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of remediation guidance for specific environments. Consult PROG MIS's official security advisories and your internal security team for definitive guidance. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-15. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2016-20062HIGHSQL Injection in Simply Poll 1.4.1 WordPress Plugin - Unauthenticated Data Theft
- CVE-2016-20063HIGHSQL Injection in Single Personal Message 1.0.3 – Credential & Data Theft Risk
- CVE-2016-20065HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in Product Catalog 8 WordPress Plugin
- CVE-2016-20068HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in WordPress Booking Calendar Contact Form 1.0.23
- CVE-2016-20069HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in WordPress Booking Calendar Contact Form 1.0.23
- CVE-2016-20071HIGHCritical SQL Injection in WordPress 404 Redirection Manager Plugin v1.0
- CVE-2016-20072HIGHBBS e-Franchise WordPress Plugin SQL Injection – Remote Data Exfiltration Risk
- CVE-2016-20073HIGHSQL Injection in Answer My Question 1.3 WordPress Plugin