CVE-2026-13482: SkyPilot User ID Hash Weakness
SkyPilot, an open-source infrastructure orchestration tool, contains a cryptographic weakness in how it handles user identification. Specifically, the user ID encoding function in the User ID Handler uses an insufficiently strong hashing method. While the vulnerability requires specific conditions to exploit and carries low risk overall, the public availability of exploit details means organizations running affected versions should plan to upgrade.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 3.7 LOW · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-327, CWE-328
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-28 / 2026-06-29
NVD description (verbatim)
A vulnerability was detected in skypilot-org skypilot up to 0.12.0. Impacted is the function username.encode of the file sky/users/server.py of the component User ID Handler. The manipulation results in use of weak hash. The attack may be performed from remote. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.
6 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-13482 is a weak cryptographic hash vulnerability in SkyPilot versions up to 0.12.0. The flaw exists in the username.encode function within sky/users/server.py, part of the User ID Handler component. An attacker can exploit this by leveraging the predictable or reversible nature of the hash to potentially forge or manipulate user identity tokens. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-327 (Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm) and CWE-328 (Use of Insufficiently Random Values). Exploitation requires high complexity and is difficult to execute, but exploit code is now publicly available.
Business impact
The integrity risk is contained: an attacker could potentially forge or tamper with user identity information in SkyPilot deployments. This could allow unauthorized access to infrastructure resources or unauthorized operations within a cluster. For organizations using SkyPilot in production environments with sensitive workloads or multi-tenant setups, this represents a credential/identity manipulation risk rather than a widespread compromise vector. The low CVSS score reflects the difficulty of exploitation and limited scope of impact, but the practical concern depends on how SkyPilot is deployed and whether user isolation is critical to your security posture.
Affected systems
SkyPilot versions up to and including 0.12.0 are affected. The vulnerability is in the open-source SkyPilot project maintained by skypilot-org. If your organization uses SkyPilot for cloud resource orchestration or workload scheduling, verify your installed version against the 0.12.0 threshold. Affected deployments are those where the User ID Handler is active and user authentication or identity isolation is relied upon for access control.
Exploitability
Exploitation is difficult and requires high complexity, evidenced by a CVSS Attack Complexity (AC) rating of High. However, exploit details are now public, lowering the barrier for determined attackers. No CVSS user interaction is required, and the attack is network-accessible, meaning a remote attacker can attempt exploitation without physical access. The practical difficulty remains non-trivial, but teams should not assume obscurity as a defense given public proof-of-concept availability.
Remediation
Upgrade SkyPilot to a patched version released after 0.12.0. Verify the exact patched version against the official SkyPilot GitHub repository or vendor advisory. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement network-level access controls to restrict direct connectivity to affected SkyPilot clusters and monitor for suspicious user identity token manipulation or forged authentication attempts.
Patch guidance
Visit the SkyPilot GitHub repository (github.com/skypilot-org/skypilot) and check the releases page for versions newer than 0.12.0. The vendor was contacted early during the disclosure process, so a patch should be available or imminent. Review the release notes to confirm that the User ID Handler hashing has been strengthened to use a cryptographically sound algorithm (e.g., bcrypt, PBKDF2, or Argon2 if applicable to SkyPilot's architecture). Test the patched version in a staging environment before deployment to production.
Detection guidance
Monitor SkyPilot server logs in sky/users/server.py for anomalous user ID encoding behavior or failed authentication attempts. If you have HTTP/API traffic logging, look for repeated attempts to forge or manipulate user tokens. Check for any unusual privilege escalations or resource access patterns that coincide with the public exploit disclosure date (on or after 2026-06-28). Implement host-based intrusion detection rules that flag attempts to read or tamper with SkyPilot's user identity files or token storage.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is low (3.7), this vulnerability warrants timely attention because: (1) exploit code is publicly available, reducing the technical barrier to attack; (2) it affects user identity integrity, a foundational security control; (3) SkyPilot is increasingly used in cloud infrastructure automation pipelines where compromised identity could lead to lateral movement or resource hijacking. Prioritize this as a medium-effort, medium-urgency patch cycle item—not an emergency, but not a defer-to-next-quarter ticket either.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 3.7 (LOW) reflects: Network accessibility (AV:N), high attack complexity (AC:H), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), no confidentiality impact (C:N), low integrity impact (I:L), and no availability impact (A:N). The low severity is justified by the difficulty of exploitation and limited blast radius (only user identity, not system-wide compromise). However, the public exploit availability and foundational nature of user identity systems mean the practical risk may be higher than the numeric score suggests for organizations where SkyPilot is critical infrastructure.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability allow remote code execution or denial of service?
No. The vulnerability is limited to user identity integrity. It does not enable remote code execution, denial of service, or confidentiality breaches. An attacker could potentially forge or manipulate user tokens, but cannot execute arbitrary commands or crash the service.
Is SkyPilot vulnerable if I'm only using it in a single-user or air-gapped environment?
The risk is substantially lower in single-user deployments where user isolation is not a concern. However, if your SkyPilot instance can be reached from an untrusted network or supports multiple users, you should still upgrade to eliminate the attack surface.
What does 'high complexity' mean in practical terms?
High attack complexity means an attacker must overcome non-trivial obstacles—such as knowledge of the specific hashing implementation, local file system access to tokens, or precise timing—to exploit this flaw. It's not a one-click exploit, but public exploit code suggests these obstacles are not insurmountable for motivated attackers.
Should I roll back to an older version of SkyPilot if I'm currently past 0.12.0?
No. Only versions up to 0.12.0 are vulnerable. If you're already running a version newer than 0.12.0, you are not affected. Verify your installed version with 'skypilot --version' or by checking your deployment manifest.
This analysis is based on the CVE-2026-13482 official description and CVSS 3.1 scoring published on 2026-06-28. Vendor product and version information may change; always verify patch availability and compatibility against the official SkyPilot repository and your deployment documentation. This assessment is for informational purposes and does not constitute professional security advice. Consult your security team and SkyPilot vendor advisories before implementing any remediation. SEC.co assumes no liability for operational decisions made in reliance on this intelligence. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-06. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10766LOWMLRun DataFrame Hash Weakness (CVSS 3.6)
- CVE-2026-10783LOWWeak Hash in Gradio Audio Cache – Risk Assessment & Patching Guide
- CVE-2026-10800LOWPaddlePaddle FastDeploy Weak Hash Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10801LOWWeak Hash in ModelScope ms-swift PIL Image Cache
- CVE-2026-10803LOWMLflow Weak Hash Vulnerability in Dataset Digest Computation
- CVE-2026-10804LOWStreamlit Weak Hashing Vulnerability in Palette Handler (CVSS 3.6)
- CVE-2026-10812LOWGPTCache Weak Hash Vulnerability in Cache Key Handler (CVSS 3.6)
- CVE-2026-10813LOWLMCache Weak Hash Vulnerability in KV Cache Handler