CVE-2026-10804: Streamlit Weak Hashing Vulnerability in Palette Handler (CVSS 3.6)
Streamlit versions up to 1.53.0 contain a weak cryptographic hashing vulnerability in its palette handler component. An attacker with local system access and authenticated user privileges can manipulate the hashing function to produce predictable or non-unique hash values, potentially allowing them to bypass integrity checks or cause minor application disruptions. The attack is complex and requires deep knowledge of the affected code path, making opportunistic exploitation unlikely. However, the vulnerability is not currently tracked as an active threat on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 3.6 LOW · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-327, CWE-328
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-04 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
A vulnerability has been found in Streamlit up to 1.53.0. Impacted is an unknown function in the library lib/streamlit/runtime/caching/hashing.py of the component Palette Handler. Such manipulation leads to use of weak hash. Local access is required to approach this attack. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
7 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability resides in lib/streamlit/runtime/caching/hashing.py within Streamlit's palette handler, where a weak hash algorithm is used for cryptographic operations. The affected function fails to meet modern cryptographic standards, specifically using algorithms or practices that do not provide adequate collision resistance or unpredictability (CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm; CWE-328: Use of Insufficiently Random Values). Exploitation requires local filesystem or process access, authenticated user context, and a high degree of complexity to craft a payload that successfully manipulates the hash output. The CVSS v3.1 score of 3.6 (LOW) reflects the restricted attack surface and limited impact scope.
Business impact
The primary risk is integrity compromise within Streamlit applications that rely on hash-based caching or palette validation. Organizations using Streamlit for data science workflows or internal dashboarding may experience cache poisoning or minor denial-of-service conditions if an authenticated user on the same system exploits this weakness. The attack does not grant remote access, privilege escalation, or confidentiality breaches, limiting business impact to localized application reliability. Development teams should assess whether their Streamlit deployments process sensitive configuration data through the affected palette handler.
Affected systems
Snowflake Streamlit versions 1.53.0 and earlier are affected. Organizations running Streamlit in multi-user environments (shared servers, Jupyter Hub clusters, or containerized deployments) face the highest risk, as local access by multiple authenticated users increases the surface for exploitation. Streamlit instances isolated to single-user development machines carry minimal practical risk.
Exploitability
Exploitation is difficult and requires authenticated local access—a significant barrier in most cloud-hosted or SaaS deployments. The attacker must understand the internal structure of the palette handler and possess the ability to influence hashing inputs or observe hash outputs. Public disclosure of the vulnerability has occurred, but the high complexity and local-only attack vector have likely prevented widespread weaponization. No active exploitation has been reported in the wild as of the last modification date.
Remediation
Upgrade Streamlit to a version newer than 1.53.0 as soon as such a release becomes available. A pull request addressing the weak hashing issue is currently under review by the Streamlit development team. In the interim, restrict local system access to trusted administrators and limit concurrent user sessions on shared Streamlit instances. If feasible, isolate Streamlit deployments to single-user environments or air-gapped networks until a patch is released.
Patch guidance
Monitor Snowflake's Streamlit release notes and GitHub repository for the availability of a patched version. The open pull request to fix this issue should be merged and released in an upcoming minor or patch release. Verify against the vendor advisory before deploying any update to confirm that the hashing vulnerability is explicitly addressed. Consider subscribing to Streamlit's security announcements to receive timely notification when the fix is released.
Detection guidance
Review Streamlit application logs for unusual caching behavior or integrity validation failures, particularly in the palette handler component. Monitor filesystem and process-level access to lib/streamlit/runtime/caching/hashing.py on systems running Streamlit. In multi-user environments, audit user authentication logs to identify which accounts accessed the Streamlit instance during suspected compromise windows. Standard intrusion detection signatures are unlikely to be effective given the local-access-only requirement; focus on process-level and application-level monitoring.
Why prioritize this
Despite the low CVSS score, organizations with multi-user Streamlit deployments should address this vulnerability in a regular patching cycle. The primary drivers for inclusion in a patch window are the authenticated local access requirement (which eliminates remote exploitation risk) and the clear availability of a fix in review. Prioritize systems where Streamlit processes or caches sensitive data; deprioritize isolated development machines. This is not an emergency patch scenario.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS v3.1 score of 3.6 reflects a constrained attack surface (local access only, authenticated user required), high attack complexity, and limited impact (integrity compromise without confidentiality or availability damage). The 'L' in the severity rating accurately captures the low real-world threat posed by this weakness in typical deployment scenarios. Organizations with strict application isolation or role-based access controls face even lower risk.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely?
No. The attack vector is local-only, meaning the attacker must have direct access to the system running Streamlit and an authenticated user account. Remote exploitation is not possible.
Will upgrading Streamlit immediately break my application?
Upgrading to a patched version should not cause breaking changes, as the fix addresses an internal hashing weakness, not public APIs. However, test in a staging environment first to confirm compatibility with your specific Streamlit code and dependencies.
Do I need to rotate cached data or reset my application after patching?
If you suspect that an authenticated user on your system deliberately exploited this weakness to poison caches, audit your application state and consider clearing cached data. For most deployments with minimal local-user risk, a standard upgrade is sufficient.
How do I monitor if someone is exploiting this in my environment?
Monitor Streamlit application logs, server process monitoring, and authentication records for unusual activity coinciding with palette handler or caching operations. Given the local-only requirement, review who has shell or filesystem access to your Streamlit servers and when they accessed the hashing module.
This analysis is based on publicly available information as of June 2026. The characterization of exploitability, patch status, and affected versions relies on data from the CVE record and vendor advisories. Organizations should verify all patch version numbers and remediation steps directly against official Snowflake and Streamlit release documentation before deployment. No warranty is provided regarding the accuracy or completeness of this assessment. This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute professional security advice. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10766LOWMLRun DataFrame Hash Weakness (CVSS 3.6)
- CVE-2026-10783LOWWeak Hash in Gradio Audio Cache – Risk Assessment & Patching Guide
- CVE-2026-10800LOWPaddlePaddle FastDeploy Weak Hash Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10801LOWWeak Hash in ModelScope ms-swift PIL Image Cache
- CVE-2026-10803LOWMLflow Weak Hash Vulnerability in Dataset Digest Computation
- CVE-2026-10812LOWGPTCache Weak Hash Vulnerability in Cache Key Handler (CVSS 3.6)
- CVE-2026-10813LOWLMCache Weak Hash Vulnerability in KV Cache Handler
- CVE-2026-10814MEDIUMWeak Hash Implementation in Milvus Grantee ID Handler