CVE-2026-12162: Improper Host Validation in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2026.2.8 Allows Credential Disclosure
Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager version 2026.2.8 contains a flaw in how it validates the identity of social login providers during the autofill process. An attacker can craft a malicious web entry pointing to a lookalike domain that mimics a legitimate social login provider. When a user interacts with this entry, the application fails to properly verify the provider's authenticity, potentially exposing stored social login credentials to the attacker. This is a social engineering vulnerability that exploits the trust users place in the autofill mechanism.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-297
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-16 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Improper host validation in the social login autofill feature in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2026.2.8 allows an attacker to disclose stored social login credentials via a crafted web entry pointing to a provider lookalike domain.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-12162 stems from improper host validation (CWE-297) in the social login autofill feature of Remote Desktop Manager. The vulnerability allows an attacker to create a web entry with a crafted domain that resembles a legitimate social login provider. Because the application does not adequately validate that the host matches the intended provider before autofilling credentials, users may unknowingly submit their social login credentials to an attacker-controlled domain. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L) indicates network-based attack feasibility, low attack complexity, requirement for valid user credentials, and user interaction—reflecting a credential disclosure scenario.
Business impact
While the vulnerability requires an authenticated attacker and user interaction, it directly threatens credential security. Organizations relying on Remote Desktop Manager to safeguard social login credentials face a risk of unauthorized account access if users are deceived into autofilling credentials on lookalike domains. Depending on the scope of social accounts managed through the application (email, cloud services, third-party integrations), a breach could cascade into lateral movement or unauthorized access to business systems. The medium CVSS score reflects that impact is limited to credential disclosure rather than full system compromise, but remediation should not be delayed given the sensitivity of social login credentials.
Affected systems
Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager version 2026.2.8 is affected. Organizations using this version—particularly those managing a large inventory of social login credentials for staff or contractors—should inventory their deployments and prioritize patching. Verify whether your environment uses the vulnerable version and assess the scope of social login credentials stored within affected instances.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires a valid Remote Desktop Manager user account and social engineering to convince that user to interact with a crafted web entry. An attacker cannot force autofill from outside the application; they must either compromise an existing account or use social engineering to trick a legitimate user into creating or clicking a malicious entry. This significantly narrows the practical attack surface, explaining the medium rather than high severity rating. However, once user interaction is obtained, the credential disclosure is straightforward and requires no special technical sophistication.
Remediation
Upgrade Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager to a patched version that includes proper host validation in the social login autofill feature. Verify the specific patched version against Devolutions' official advisory and security bulletins. Organizations should test patches in a non-production environment before rollout to ensure compatibility with existing credential profiles and workflows. As an interim control, consider disabling or restricting the social login autofill feature if it is not mission-critical, and educate users on the risks of interacting with unfamiliar or suspicious web entries.
Patch guidance
Contact Devolutions for official patch availability and verify the patched version number through their security advisory. Once patched, plan a coordinated rollout across your Remote Desktop Manager deployment. Given that the application is credential-management software, schedule updates during maintenance windows and confirm that all user profiles and credential stores remain accessible post-patch. Document the patch status to satisfy compliance and audit requirements.
Detection guidance
Monitor for suspicious web entries created within Remote Desktop Manager, particularly those with domains similar to known social login providers (e.g., domains containing typos or additional subdomains). Review audit logs if available for evidence of bulk credential autofill events or failed social login attempts following autofill. Network monitoring is less effective here because the attack leverages the application's own autofill mechanism; focus on access logs and user behavior analytics. Conduct user awareness training to help staff recognize and report suspicious entries.
Why prioritize this
Although exploitability requires user interaction and valid credentials (lowering the attack surface), this vulnerability directly exposes high-value social login credentials. Many organizations rely on social accounts as jump points to cloud infrastructure, email, and third-party services. The medium CVSS score and non-KEV status should not minimize urgency; prioritize patching in environments where Remote Desktop Manager stores credentials for business-critical social accounts. Organizations with strong user security awareness may defer slightly longer than those with historically high phishing success rates.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.5 (Medium) reflects a network-accessible vulnerability with low attack complexity but high friction: exploitation requires valid user credentials and relies on social engineering to trigger autofill. The impact is limited to credential disclosure (confidentiality, integrity, and availability each rated Low) rather than remote code execution or system takeover. The score appropriately captures that while the risk is real and credentials are valuable, the attack chain is not trivial. However, organizations should apply contextual risk assessment—environments managing highly sensitive social accounts or facing advanced social engineering threats may justify prioritization above a typical medium-severity patch.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to have valid Remote Desktop Manager credentials for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability?
Yes. An attacker must either compromise a legitimate user account or convince a user to interact with a malicious entry they have created or shared. They cannot remotely trigger autofill without user involvement. This is why the vulnerability is rated as requiring user interaction (UI:R) in the CVSS vector.
What is the difference between this vulnerability and a typical phishing attack?
Traditional phishing tricks users into visiting a fake site outside their trusted application. This vulnerability exploits the trust placed in Remote Desktop Manager's autofill feature itself, making the attack more convincing because the autofill appears to come from the application rather than an external link. The attacker leverages the application's own mechanism to deliver lookalike credentials.
If I upgrade Remote Desktop Manager, will my existing social login credentials continue to work?
Patched versions will continue to support social login autofill, but with corrected host validation to prevent lookalike domain attacks. Your stored credentials should remain intact. However, always test patches in a lab environment first to confirm compatibility before deploying to production.
Is this vulnerability being actively exploited in the wild?
This vulnerability is not listed on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating no confirmed active exploitation at the time of publication. However, the absence of public exploitation does not mean the threat is negligible—especially if social engineers target your organization directly.
This analysis is based on publicly available information as of June 2026 and is provided for informational purposes. Patch availability, timeline, and version numbers should be verified directly with Devolutions' official security advisory. This is not legal, compliance, or vendor-specific risk guidance. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their environment, threat model, and regulatory requirements. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of remediation steps and recommends consulting with Devolutions support before deploying patches to production systems. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-23. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-35563HIGHApache Directory LDAP API Hostname Verification Bypass
- CVE-2026-44393HIGHOpenStack oslo.messaging RabbitMQ TLS Hostname Verification Bypass
- CVE-2026-10544MEDIUMDevolutions Server PAM Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10786MEDIUMDevolutions Server Credential Disclosure via Improper Access Control
- CVE-2026-10787MEDIUMMissing Authorization in Devolutions Server Deleted User Groups API
- CVE-2026-11890MEDIUMDevolutions Server Account Discovery Access Control Flaw
- CVE-2026-12105MEDIUMDevolutions Server Improper Access Control Allows Unauthorized Attachment Disclosure
- CVE-2026-12117MEDIUMDevolutions Server Access Control Flaw Enables Social Login Metadata Enumeration