CVE-2026-12117: Devolutions Server Access Control Flaw Enables Social Login Metadata Enumeration
Devolutions Server 2026.2.5 contains an access control flaw that allows authenticated users to view metadata about social login configurations they shouldn't have permission to access. An attacker with a valid vault membership can craft specific API requests to enumerate social login entry details, potentially revealing sensitive integration information. This is a low-risk exposure of metadata rather than a direct compromise mechanism, but it can aid reconnaissance or inform follow-up attacks against connected identity systems.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 4.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-200
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-16 / 2026-06-18
NVD description (verbatim)
Improper access control in the social login connection endpoint in Devolutions Server 2026.2.5 allows an authenticated vault member to enumerate social login entry metadata to which they are not authorized via a crafted API request.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-12117 stems from improper access control validation on the social login connection endpoint in Devolutions Server 2026.2.5. The vulnerability enables an authenticated vault member to bypass authorization checks and retrieve social login entry metadata via crafted API requests. The flaw is classified under CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor), confirming that the core issue is insufficient boundary enforcement between user roles and sensitive configuration data. The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 reflects the requirement for prior authentication, the network-accessible endpoint, and the confidentiality impact limited to metadata disclosure without integrity or availability compromise.
Business impact
Exposure of social login metadata could enable reconnaissance by internal actors or attackers with compromised credentials. Social login configurations often include details about third-party identity providers, redirect URIs, and integration scope—information that could support lateral movement or social engineering targeting integrated applications. For organizations using Devolutions Server as a centralized credential vault, this represents a control boundary violation that undermines the principle of least privilege in secret management. The risk is moderate because exploitation requires existing authentication and the damage is primarily informational, but metadata disclosure can significantly lower the bar for subsequent attacks.
Affected systems
The vulnerability specifically affects Devolutions Server version 2026.2.5. Organizations running this version with social login connections configured and multiple vault members with different privilege levels face the highest risk. The flaw does not appear to affect other Devolutions products based on available data, though administrators should verify their specific deployment versions against vendor advisories.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires an authenticated account within the Devolutions vault, meaning external unauthenticated attackers cannot directly trigger the flaw. However, the bar for exploitation is low once credentials are obtained: the attacker simply crafts API requests to the social login endpoint without requiring user interaction or special tools. The attack surface is internal but real—any vault member, regardless of intended privilege level, can attempt enumeration. The vulnerability is not currently tracked in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, though this does not indicate absence of threat actor interest given the simplicity of exploitation.
Remediation
Patch to a version of Devolutions Server that addresses this access control flaw. Consult the vendor advisory for the specific patched version number and upgrade timeline. In the interim, implement network segmentation to restrict API access to the social login endpoint, enforce strong authentication policies to reduce compromised credential risk, and audit vault membership to ensure role assignments align with business need. Monitor API logs for unusual enumeration patterns against social login endpoints as a detective control.
Patch guidance
Apply patches from Devolutions as soon as they are available and validated in your test environment. Given the MEDIUM severity and the requirement for prior authentication, this should be prioritized within a standard maintenance cycle but does not warrant emergency patching. Verify the patched version number in the official Devolutions advisory before deployment. Test social login functionality after patching to ensure integration with connected identity providers remains operational.
Detection guidance
Monitor Devolutions Server API logs for repeated requests to social login connection endpoints originating from vault members who should not have authorization to those resources. Look for patterns of enumeration—multiple sequential requests with different parameters—from authenticated sessions. SIEM rules should flag unusual API activity against sensitive endpoints, particularly where role-based access control boundaries may be tested. Periodic access reviews of vault member roles against their actual API usage patterns can reveal misaligned permissions before exploitation occurs.
Why prioritize this
CVE-2026-12117 merits prioritization within a standard patching cadence due to its low barrier to exploitation (authenticated attacker, simple API request) and its violation of fundamental access control principles. While the MEDIUM CVSS reflects limited direct impact, metadata disclosure in a credential management platform can amplify downstream risks. Organizations should patch ahead of any public tooling that might automate exploitation, though the lack of KEV designation suggests current threat activity is not widespread. Prioritize instances where vault members span multiple organizational units or trust boundaries.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 (MEDIUM) reflects a network-accessible, low-complexity attack that requires low privilege (PR:L) and valid vault authentication. The vulnerability causes confidentiality impact (C:L)—unauthorized access to social login metadata—but does not compromise integrity or availability (I:N/A:N). The attack scope remains unchanged (S:U), meaning the attacker cannot pivot to systems outside Devolutions Server itself. While the score is moderate, organizations should weigh the strategic value of social login configuration data in their threat model; for some enterprises, metadata disclosure warrants more urgent attention than the base score alone suggests.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited by unauthenticated attackers?
No. CVE-2026-12117 requires a valid, authenticated vault membership. Unauthenticated external attackers cannot trigger the flaw. However, any vault member—regardless of their intended privilege level—can attempt to enumerate social login metadata they should not see, making it an insider risk concern.
What exactly is 'social login entry metadata' and why should I care?
Social login entries contain configuration details about integrations with identity providers (e.g., Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, SAML endpoints). Metadata includes connection names, redirect URIs, provider endpoints, and scope settings. This information helps attackers understand your authentication infrastructure and can support phishing, OAuth token interception, or reconnaissance for targeted attacks on integrated services.
Do I need to change my password if I use Devolutions Server 2026.2.5?
Password changes are not directly required by this vulnerability since the flaw does not compromise stored secrets or enable credential extraction. However, if you suspect unauthorized vault member enumeration activity, review user access logs and audit vault member roles. Update passwords for accounts that may have been used to explore the system if you detect suspicious patterns.
What is the difference between this vulnerability and a true privilege escalation?
This is improper access control on a specific endpoint—it allows authorized users to exceed their intended access to information. It is not privilege escalation in the traditional sense (a user gaining a higher role), but rather a boundary violation that lets a user peek at data outside their assigned scope. It can facilitate later attacks but does not immediately elevate the attacker to admin or grant control over other vault members' secrets.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects the vulnerability details and CVSS scoring published by Devolutions and available as of the modification date. Patch version numbers, release timelines, and specific remediation steps must be verified against official Devolutions advisories before deployment. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific Devolutions Server configurations, vault membership structure, and threat environment. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided or endorsed. Always test patches in a non-production environment before enterprise rollout. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-23. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10254MEDIUMUnauthenticated Information Disclosure in SourceCodester Pet Grooming Software
- CVE-2026-10854MEDIUMMISP Galaxy Visibility Control Bypass – Unauthorized Private Metadata Access
- CVE-2026-10864MEDIUMMISP Dashboard Widget Field Filtering Bypass (Medium)
- CVE-2026-11162MEDIUMChrome CSS Cross-Origin Data Leak Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-11168MEDIUMChrome Extension Memory Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-11180MEDIUMChrome SVG Cross-Origin Data Leak – Patch & Mitigation Guide
- CVE-2026-11182MEDIUMChrome SVG Cross-Origin Data Leak Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-11203MEDIUMChrome GPU Isolation Bypass on macOS Allows Cross-Origin Data Leak