CVE-2026-11410: TP-Link TL-WR940N v6 Authenticated Command Injection – Patch Now
A high-severity command injection flaw has been discovered in TP-Link TL-WR940N v6 routers within the BigPond Cable WAN configuration settings. An attacker who already has administrator-level access to the device can inject arbitrary operating system commands, which then execute with elevated privileges. While the vulnerability requires prior administrative credentials, successful exploitation grants complete control over the affected router, making this a critical privilege escalation risk for organizations deploying these devices.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.2 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-78
- Affected products
- 2 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-17 / 2026-06-18
NVD description (verbatim)
An authenticated OS command injection vulnerability exists in the BigPond Cable (BPA) WAN configuration module in TL-WR940N v6 due to improper sanitization of user input. An attacker with administrative access may exploit this issue to execute arbitrary system commands with elevated privileges.
3 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-11410 is an authenticated OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) in the BigPond Cable (BPA) WAN configuration module of TP-Link TL-WR940N v6. The flaw stems from insufficient input validation and sanitization of user-supplied parameters. An authenticated attacker can craft malicious input containing shell metacharacters to break out of the intended command context and execute arbitrary system commands. The vulnerability carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 (HIGH) with a network-accessible attack vector, low attack complexity, and high privileges required. Impact is complete—confidentiality, integrity, and availability are all fully compromised.
Business impact
Compromise of a TL-WR940N v6 router gives an attacker control over network traffic, potential lateral movement into connected systems, and ability to manipulate or exfiltrate data. In business environments, this translates to loss of network perimeter integrity, possible man-in-the-middle attack enablement, and supply-chain trust degradation if these routers are deployed at customer sites or branch offices. The authentication requirement limits exposure to insider threats and compromised administrative accounts—a meaningful but incomplete mitigation.
Affected systems
TP-Link TL-WR940N v6 routers running vulnerable firmware are in scope. The specific affected firmware versions should be verified against TP-Link's advisory. Organizations using this router model, particularly in Australia and regions served by BigPond Cable, are at highest risk. Check your device firmware version via the administrative web interface or SSH console.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires pre-existing administrative credentials to the router's web interface or SSH access. This authentication gate significantly reduces real-world attack surface compared to unauthenticated vulnerabilities. However, compromised admin credentials—whether through phishing, credential reuse, or prior lateral movement—are not uncommon, making this a practical risk once an attacker gains initial foothold into a network segment. No public exploit code is known to be available, and the vulnerability is not listed on CISA's KEV catalog.
Remediation
Immediately apply the latest firmware update from TP-Link for the TL-WR940N v6. Verify the firmware version in the device's administrative settings and download patches directly from TP-Link's official support portal. Pending patching, enforce strong, unique administrative passwords, disable remote management access if not required, and restrict administrative access to trusted networks only. Consider segmenting these devices on isolated network VLANs to limit blast radius.
Patch guidance
Visit TP-Link's official support website and locate the TL-WR940N v6 product page. Download the latest available firmware build for your region (particularly for BigPond/Australian variants). The patch information should detail the specific firmware version that closes this vulnerability; verify the release notes confirm CVE-2026-11410 remediation. Deploy the patch in a maintenance window after backing up current router configuration. Test basic connectivity and WAN functionality post-patch to confirm stability.
Detection guidance
Monitor router administrative access logs for unusual login patterns, especially from non-standard IP addresses or at irregular times. Search logs for command injection indicators—look for input containing backticks, dollar-parentheses syntax, semicolons, or pipes ('|', ';', '`', '$()') in WAN configuration parameters. Network-based detection is limited since the attack occurs post-authentication; focus on monitoring administrative console activity and filesystem changes on the router. If your security tools can capture HTTP POST payloads to the WAN config module, inspect for shell metacharacters.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits rapid but not emergency patching. The HIGH CVSS score and complete impact scope (CIA all compromised) demand timely remediation, but the authentication requirement limits your immediate exposure. Prioritize patches for routers exposed to untrusted networks, those supporting critical business functions, or devices in high-risk segments. Tier patching: first, internet-facing administrative interfaces; second, branch office and customer-facing deployments; third, internal-only lab or non-critical routers.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 reflects the combination of high impact (all three security properties fully compromised), low attack complexity, and network accessibility, tempered significantly by the requirement for high privileges (administrative access). The score is appropriate: this is a serious post-compromise escalation vector that a security leader should address promptly but not at the expense of unpatched unauthenticated RCE flaws elsewhere in their environment.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to patch if we've already disabled remote administrative access to our TL-WR940N v6 routers?
Disabling remote management substantially reduces attack surface and is an excellent compensating control. However, patching remains advisable as a best practice, since insider threats, credential compromise, or local network access could still enable exploitation. Combine network access restrictions with timely patching for defense in depth.
Will patching the firmware erase our WAN configuration settings?
Typically, a firmware update preserves configuration. However, backup your current WAN and network settings before patching as a precaution. Most TP-Link devices allow export of configuration from the admin interface—use this before the update.
Is this vulnerability actively being exploited in the wild?
The vulnerability is not listed on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating no confirmed public exploitation activity at the time of publication. However, the authentication requirement and potential for insider misuse mean organizations should still treat it with appropriate urgency rather than defer indefinitely.
What if we cannot patch immediately?
Implement immediate mitigations: enforce strong, unique admin passwords (16+ characters); disable or restrict remote management access; block administrative ports at the network edge unless accessing from a VPN; and monitor access logs closely for anomalous login attempts or unusual WAN configuration changes. Schedule patching within 30 days.
This analysis is based on the vulnerability details published as of June 17, 2026. Patch versions, availability, and specific remediation steps should be verified directly against TP-Link's official security advisories before implementation. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding completeness or accuracy of vendor-supplied remediation timelines. Security controls and mitigations described here are recommendations and do not guarantee protection against all attack variants. Organizations are responsible for validating patches in their own environment before production deployment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-26. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-41265HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host OS Command Injection (CVSS 7.2)
- CVE-2025-41266HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2025-41267HIGHWaterfall WF-500 TX Host Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-41279HIGHOS Command Injection in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host Administration WebUI
- CVE-2025-41281HIGHWaterfall WF-500 OS Command Injection
- CVE-2025-66273HIGHQNAP Command Injection in QTS and QuTS hero
- CVE-2025-66279HIGHQNAP NAS Command Injection – Admin Authentication Required, HIGH Severity
- CVE-2025-69755HIGHNeterbit NW-431F Router RCE and Data Exposure Vulnerability