CVE-2026-10693: Improper Authorization in SourceCodester Boat Reservation System 1.0
SourceCodester Online Boat Reservation System version 1.0 contains a flaw in its administrative endpoints that fails to properly verify user permissions. An authenticated attacker can exploit this improper authorization to access or modify administrative functions they shouldn't have access to. The vulnerability requires an existing user account but can be exploited over the network without user interaction. The flaw affects multiple administrative endpoints, and exploit details have been publicly disclosed.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 6.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-266, CWE-285
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-03 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
A security vulnerability has been detected in SourceCodester Online Boat Reservation System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Administrative Endpoint. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Multiple endpoints are affected.
6 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-10693 is a medium-severity improper authorization vulnerability (CVSS 3.1 score: 6.3) in SourceCodester Online Boat Reservation System 1.0. The vulnerability exists in an unspecified administrative endpoint component and stems from insufficient access control checks (CWE-266, CWE-285). The authentication vector indicates that a logged-in user with limited privileges can bypass authorization controls to perform unauthorized administrative actions. The attack requires network access and valid credentials but no user interaction or special privileges. Multiple endpoints are impacted, suggesting a systemic authorization design issue rather than an isolated flaw.
Business impact
This vulnerability could allow internal users or compromised low-privilege accounts to perform administrative functions such as modifying system settings, accessing sensitive booking or customer data, or disrupting the reservation system's operations. For boat rental businesses relying on this system, unauthorized administrative access could lead to data breaches, service interruption, financial fraud, or reputational damage. The impact is amplified if customer financial information or payment details are accessible through administrative endpoints.
Affected systems
SourceCodester Online Boat Reservation System version 1.0 is affected. The vendor product list provided contains no additional details on deployments or variants. Organizations running this specific version should assume they are vulnerable. Version 2.0 or later releases have not been evaluated in this data; check vendor advisories for confirmation of fixes in newer versions.
Exploitability
Exploitability is moderate to high. The vulnerability requires an authenticated account, which restricts attack surface to internal users or those with valid credentials obtained through phishing or credential compromise. However, the public disclosure of exploit details lowers the barrier to weaponization. An attacker already inside the perimeter or with a compromised user account can likely exploit this flaw with relative ease using standard web tools. The multiple affected endpoints suggest a broad attack surface within the administrative interface.
Remediation
The primary remediation is to upgrade from version 1.0 to a patched release. Verify the latest available version from SourceCodester and review the vendor advisory to confirm that authorization controls have been implemented or corrected. Until patching is possible, restrict administrative endpoint access to a minimal set of trusted users, implement network segmentation to limit who can reach the administrative interface, and enforce strong authentication (consider multi-factor authentication for administrative accounts).
Patch guidance
Contact SourceCodester directly or check their official website for available patches or version updates beyond 1.0. The vendor advisory should specify which version resolves CWE-266 and CWE-285 issues. If the system is critical to operations, test any patch in a non-production environment first. Given the public disclosure status, prioritize patching within your standard change management window, but do not defer indefinitely.
Detection guidance
Monitor authentication logs for unusual patterns of administrative endpoint access by low-privilege users. Look for failed authorization attempts or unexpected successful access to /admin or similar restricted paths from authenticated sessions that typically would not have those permissions. Inspect web server logs for POST or PUT requests to administrative endpoints from non-admin user agents or sources. Consider implementing IDS/IPS rules triggered by authorization bypass attempts. If the system supports audit logging, review administrative action logs for entries initiated by unexpected user accounts.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score of 6.3 places this in the medium-severity band, the combination of public exploit availability, authenticated attack vector, and multiple affected endpoints elevates practical priority. The vulnerability directly impacts system confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Organizations should prioritize patching after critical/high-severity flaws but well ahead of low-priority items, especially if the boat reservation system handles sensitive customer or financial data.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L) reflects: network-accessible attack surface (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), requirement for low privilege/authenticated user (PR:L), no user interaction needed (UI:N), impact confined to the vulnerable component (S:U), and partial confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss (C:L/I:L/A:L). The score of 6.3 is appropriate for an authorization flaw that grants partial administrative capabilities but does not allow complete system takeover or privilege escalation to root/system level.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to patch immediately if we only allow internal staff to access the system?
Internal access reduces external attack surface but does not eliminate risk. Compromised internal accounts, malicious insiders, or lateral movement by attackers already inside the network could still exploit this flaw. Given the public disclosure, patching should be prioritized within your standard maintenance cycle, though the urgency is lower than for internet-facing systems.
Can we work around this vulnerability without upgrading?
Partial mitigation is possible through network controls: restrict administrative endpoints to a whitelist of trusted IP addresses, enforce multi-factor authentication for administrative users, and reduce the number of staff with any administrative privileges. However, these controls do not eliminate the underlying flaw; they reduce attack surface. A vendor patch is the proper long-term solution.
What should we check in the vendor advisory to confirm we have the right patch?
Confirm that the advisory explicitly references CVE-2026-10693 and lists the fixed version number. Verify that the fix addresses CWE-266 (improper privilege assignment) and CWE-285 (improper authorization). Test the patched version in a non-production environment to ensure the fix resolves the endpoint authorization issues without breaking legitimate administrative functionality.
Is this vulnerability being actively exploited in the wild?
The vulnerability is not currently tracked in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, meaning no confirmed mass exploitation has been reported at this time. However, public exploit disclosure means it could be exploited opportunistically. Monitoring logs and network traffic for unauthorized administrative access remains important.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects the vulnerability data available as of the publish date. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of this information. Patch version numbers, vendor advisories, and remediation timelines should be verified directly with SourceCodester. Organizations are responsible for assessing their own exposure and implementing appropriate security controls. This explainer does not constitute legal advice or a guarantee of security effectiveness. Always test patches in non-production environments before deployment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10070MEDIUMmacrozheng mall Admin Authorization Bypass in /admin/update/
- CVE-2026-10215MEDIUMDolibarr Leave Request API Authorization Bypass
- CVE-2026-10218MEDIUMGoClaw Improper Authorization Vulnerability (CVSS 5.4)
- CVE-2026-10269MEDIUMHost Header Authorization Bypass in Decolua 9router
- CVE-2026-10272MEDIUMStudent-Management-System Authorization Bypass in Admin Panel
- CVE-2026-10282MEDIUMBottelet DaybydayCRM Authorization Bypass in DocumentsController
- CVE-2026-10284MEDIUMImproper Authorization in DevaslanPHP Project-Management Comment Functions
- CVE-2026-10285MEDIUMDevaslanPHP Improper Authorization in Ticket Handler