CVE-2026-10218: GoClaw Improper Authorization Vulnerability (CVSS 5.4)
A security flaw exists in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw versions up to 3.11.3 that allows authenticated users to perform actions they shouldn't be authorized to perform. The vulnerability resides in the authentication logic of the application and can be exploited remotely by someone with valid login credentials. Because the flaw has been publicly disclosed, there's elevated risk that attackers may attempt to exploit it.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.4 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-266, CWE-285
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-01 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
A vulnerability has been found in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw up to 3.11.3. This affects the function auth of the file internal/http/evolution_handlers.go. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project tagged the reported issue as bug.
6 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-10218 is an improper authorization vulnerability affecting the auth function in internal/http/evolution_handlers.go within nextlevelbuilder GoClaw. The flaw permits privilege escalation or lateral action abuse for authenticated attackers, stemming from insufficient authorization checks. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-266 (Improper Privilege Management) and CWE-285 (Improper Authorization), indicating that the application fails to properly validate or enforce access controls for certain operations. Remote exploitation is possible without additional user interaction.
Business impact
Organizations using affected versions of GoClaw face insider-threat and privilege-escalation risks. An attacker with valid credentials—whether through credential compromise, insider activity, or supply-chain access—could modify data or cause service disruptions within the application. While the CVSS score of 5.4 (Medium) reflects limited scope impact, the public disclosure means attackers are likely already analyzing exploitation methods. For systems handling sensitive workflows or multi-tenant environments, this poses operational and compliance risks.
Affected systems
nextlevelbuilder GoClaw versions 3.11.3 and earlier are affected. Organizations must identify all deployments of this product in their environment, including development, staging, and production instances. The impact applies regardless of deployment model (on-premises or cloud-hosted).
Exploitability
The vulnerability requires an attacker to possess valid authentication credentials—meaning it is not exploitable by unauthenticated users. However, given the public disclosure, attackers are actively developing and sharing exploitation techniques. The remote, network-accessible nature of the flaw and the relative simplicity of authorization bypasses make this a practical threat once credentials are obtained, whether through phishing, credential stuffing, or insider access.
Remediation
Upgrade nextlevelbuilder GoClaw to a patched version beyond 3.11.3. Consult the official nextlevelbuilder security advisory to confirm the minimum patched version. Until patching is possible, implement compensating controls such as enhanced logging and alerting on authorization failures, network segmentation to restrict GoClaw access to trusted networks, and credential rotation for high-privilege accounts that interact with the application.
Patch guidance
Check the nextlevelbuilder security advisory or release notes to identify the first patched version after 3.11.3. Plan and execute upgrades in a staged manner: test in a non-production environment first, validate functionality with dependent systems, then deploy to production during a maintenance window. Confirm the patch resolves the authorization checks in evolution_handlers.go before considering remediation complete.
Detection guidance
Monitor application logs and access controls for anomalous authorization patterns: users performing actions outside their role or scope, unexpected changes to sensitive configurations, or repeated failed authorization attempts followed by success. Deploy security scanning or SAST tools against the evolution_handlers.go file to detect similar authorization bypass patterns in custom or forked versions of the codebase. Use network-based detection to flag suspicious GoClaw API calls from unexpected source IPs or at unusual times.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score of 5.4 is medium, the combination of public disclosure, remote exploitability, and the practical attack path via credential compromise warrants prompt attention. Organizations should prioritize patching production instances within 2–4 weeks, prioritizing systems exposed to untrusted networks or handling high-value data. Development and staging instances should be updated as soon as testing confirms patch compatibility.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.4 reflects a network-accessible attack requiring low privileges (authenticated user) with low attack complexity, resulting in limited integrity and availability impact but no confidentiality loss. The score appropriately captures the need for prior authentication but does not account for the practical reality of credential compromise or the public disclosure increasing active exploitation likelihood. Your organization's risk may be higher or lower depending on exposure to untrusted users, credential hygiene, and the sensitivity of data within GoClaw.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to patch if GoClaw is only accessible to internal, trusted users?
While internal-only deployments reduce immediate risk, you should still prioritize patching because insider threats and credential compromise can enable exploitation. Public disclosure increases the sophistication of known attack techniques, and patching eliminates the vector entirely.
Can we detect if this vulnerability is being exploited in our environment?
Yes. Enable detailed audit logging on GoClaw authorization events, then search logs for users performing actions inconsistent with their roles or making repeated failed authorization attempts. Correlate with unusual login times, IP addresses, or access patterns. Your SIEM or security analytics platform can help identify anomalies in real time.
What if we run a forked or customized version of GoClaw?
Manual code review of your evolution_handlers.go implementation is necessary to confirm whether the authorization flaw exists in your fork. Engage your development team to assess the auth function and compare it to the patched upstream version once released. Do not assume customizations have incidentally fixed the issue.
Is there an official CVE advisory or security bulletin from nextlevelbuilder?
Consult nextlevelbuilder's official security advisory, release notes, or GitHub security page for patched version numbers, detailed remediation steps, and any workarounds. This CVE intelligence page summarizes the vulnerability but does not replace vendor guidance.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Patch version numbers and availability must be verified against the official nextlevelbuilder security advisory. Your organization should assess risk based on your specific deployment, data classification, and threat model. SEC.co does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of third-party vendor information. Always validate patches in a test environment before production deployment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10070MEDIUMmacrozheng mall Admin Authorization Bypass in /admin/update/
- CVE-2026-10215MEDIUMDolibarr Leave Request API Authorization Bypass
- CVE-2026-10269MEDIUMHost Header Authorization Bypass in Decolua 9router
- CVE-2026-10272MEDIUMStudent-Management-System Authorization Bypass in Admin Panel
- CVE-2026-10282MEDIUMBottelet DaybydayCRM Authorization Bypass in DocumentsController
- CVE-2026-10284MEDIUMImproper Authorization in DevaslanPHP Project-Management Comment Functions
- CVE-2026-10285MEDIUMDevaslanPHP Improper Authorization in Ticket Handler
- CVE-2026-10294MEDIUMPackageKit Authorization Bypass in versions up to 1.3.5