CVE-2026-0416: NETGEAR RAXE450/RAXE500 Input Validation Flaw (MEDIUM)
NETGEAR has identified a vulnerability affecting their RAX Wi-Fi 6 router models (RAXE450 and RAXE500) in which an authenticated administrator on the local network can send specially crafted input through the management interface to bypass built-in security controls. This could allow the attacker to modify the router's protected software or core functionality without authorization. The flaw requires an admin account and physical/local network proximity, which constrains the attack surface but remains a concern in environments where multiple administrators manage network devices.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 4.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-20
- Affected products
- 4 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-09 / 2026-06-18
NVD description (verbatim)
An insufficient input validation vulnerability in certain NETGEAR router models as listed allows an authenticated administrator with local network access to submit crafted input that bypasses intended management interface restrictions, resulting in unauthorized modification of protected router software or functionality.
3 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-0416 is an insufficient input validation flaw (CWE-20) in NETGEAR RAXE450 and RAXE500 firmware. The vulnerability allows an authenticated administrator with local network access to craft input that circumvents management interface validation checks, leading to unauthorized modification of protected router software or operational parameters. The CVSS 3.1 score is 4.5 (MEDIUM severity) with the vector CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N, indicating adjacent network attack vector, high privilege requirement, and integrity impact without confidentiality or availability loss.
Business impact
Router compromise can degrade network security and availability for the organization. An attacker with admin credentials could alter firewall rules, DNS settings, SSL/TLS interception points, or firmware behavior to enable persistent monitoring, traffic redirection, or further lateral movement within the network. For organizations relying on these NETGEAR models as edge security appliances, the integrity violation could undermine trust in network access controls and create compliance reporting obligations depending on industry or regulatory context.
Affected systems
NETGEAR RAXE450 and RAXE500 Wi-Fi 6 routers and their corresponding firmware versions are affected. RAXE450 and RAXE500 are mid-to-enterprise segment mesh systems commonly deployed in business networks for coverage and performance. Confirm your specific firmware version against NETGEAR's advisory to determine exposure; typically, models released or updated before the patch announcement are at higher risk.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires authenticated administrator access and local network connectivity—a relatively high bar. The vulnerability does not enable remote unauthenticated attack or privilege escalation from a lower-level account. However, in shared or mixed-trust network environments, compromised or rogue admin credentials present a real risk. Once authenticated, no additional user interaction is needed to craft the malicious input, making the attack straightforward for an insider or attacker who has obtained admin credentials through phishing, credential reuse, or lateral movement.
Remediation
Apply the security patch released by NETGEAR for your specific router model (RAXE450 or RAXE500) immediately. Verify the patched firmware version in NETGEAR's security advisory or product release notes. Additionally, enforce strong, unique administrator passwords; limit local network access via segmentation where possible; regularly audit admin account activity; and consider disabling remote management if not required. Rotate any compromised credentials and review configuration logs for unauthorized changes to router settings post-discovery.
Patch guidance
Check NETGEAR's official support portal or security advisory for the latest firmware version available for your RAXE450 or RAXE500 model. Download firmware only from official sources to avoid supply-chain risk. Before patching production devices, test in a non-critical environment if feasible. Apply patches during scheduled maintenance windows to avoid service interruption. Reboot the router after firmware installation to ensure the update is fully activated. Document the patching action and timestamp in your asset and change management systems.
Detection guidance
Monitor router management interface logs for unusual authentication patterns, failed login attempts, or admin account access from unexpected IP addresses or times. Inspect syslog or router audit trails for configuration changes made by admin accounts, particularly modifications to firewall rules, DHCP settings, or DNS configurations. Network-based detection is challenging because the vulnerability operates within the authenticated admin interface; rely on host and log analysis. If available, enable enhanced logging on the management interface and review logs regularly for anomalies. After patching, baseline system behavior and alert on deviations.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is MEDIUM (4.5), prioritize patching because the vulnerability directly compromises router integrity—a critical network control point. Routers are foundational to network trust and visibility; their compromise can undermine broader security investments. The requirement for admin credentials limits immediate risk, but business environments should assume periodic credential compromise and treat router hardening as essential. Patch within standard maintenance windows but do not defer indefinitely.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.5 (MEDIUM) reflects the high privilege requirement (PR:H), local/adjacent network attack vector (AV:A), and focus on integrity impact (I:H) without confidentiality or availability loss in the base case. However, contextual risk is higher: routers are high-value targets, and integrity compromise on network infrastructure can have cascading effects. Organizations should treat this as a priority fix even though it does not meet critical thresholds.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely by someone outside my network?
No. The vulnerability requires authenticated administrator credentials and local/adjacent network access. Remote exploitation is not possible under the vulnerability's design. However, if an attacker gains admin credentials through phishing or other means and gains network access (e.g., via VPN or physical intrusion), the risk becomes real.
Do I need to reset my router configuration after patching?
Not typically. The patch should simply fix the input validation flaw without altering existing settings. However, if you suspect unauthorized configuration changes were made before discovery, review and reconfigure critical policies (firewall rules, DHCP, DNS) after patching to restore a trusted state.
How can I tell if this vulnerability was exploited on my router before I patch it?
Check the router's management interface logs and configuration change history for admin actions you do not recognize, especially changes to security settings. Compare the current configuration against your baseline or recent backups. If logs are sparse or unavailable, you may need to factory reset the device and reconfigure it from a known-good backup after patching.
Are there alternative mitigations if I cannot patch immediately?
Yes. Restrict admin access to trusted IP addresses or VLANs using network access control. Disable remote management if not required. Enforce multi-factor authentication on the admin account if the device supports it. Audit admin account activity daily. However, these mitigations are not substitutes for patching—apply the patch as soon as operationally feasible.
This intelligence summary is provided for informational purposes to support vulnerability management and risk assessment. SEC.co does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of information derived from third-party sources. Verify all vulnerability details, affected product versions, patch availability, and advisory guidance directly with NETGEAR's official security advisories and support channels before making remediation or deployment decisions. Patch version numbers, KEV status, and vendor release dates should be confirmed against primary sources. Organizations are responsible for assessing the risk and applicability of this vulnerability to their environment. SEC.co shall not be liable for damages arising from reliance on this summary without independent verification. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-15. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-0410MEDIUMNetgear Router Firmware Integrity Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0412MEDIUMNETGEAR JR6150 Insufficient Input Validation (End-of-Life Router)
- CVE-2026-0415MEDIUMNETGEAR Orbi Mesh Router Insufficient Input Validation Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0417MEDIUMNETGEAR Router Input Validation Flaw – Patch & Detection Guide
- CVE-2026-0419HIGHNETGEAR JR6150 Command Injection via Insufficient Input Validation
- CVE-2025-5089MEDIUMArista EOS/CVX DoS via Malformed Messages
- CVE-2025-5090MEDIUMCVX CVE-2025-5090: Input Validation Flaw Leads to Agent Crashes and Denial of Service
- CVE-2026-0018MEDIUMAndroid AccessibilityManagerService Denial of Service Vulnerability