CVE-2026-10566: MetaGPT Local Deserialization Vulnerability Exploit Available
A vulnerability exists in FoundationAgents MetaGPT versions up to 0.8.2 that allows local attackers with user-level privileges to trigger unsafe deserialization through manipulation of function arguments in the Message.check_instruct_content handler. An attacker with local access and basic user permissions can exploit this to potentially read, modify, or disrupt system operations. Public exploit code is available, increasing near-term risk for organizations running affected versions.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-20, CWE-502
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-02 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
A weakness has been identified in FoundationAgents MetaGPT up to 0.8.2. This affects the function Message.check_instruct_content of the file metagpt/schema.py. Executing a manipulation of the argument mapping can lead to deserialization. The attack is restricted to local execution. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
6 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-10566 stems from improper input validation (CWE-20) combined with unsafe deserialization (CWE-502) in the Message.check_instruct_content function within metagpt/schema.py. The vulnerability permits an authenticated local actor to craft malicious argument mappings that bypass validation checks and trigger object deserialization with attacker-controlled data. This occurs without user interaction and operates within the security context of the calling process. The attack surface is limited to local execution contexts, but the availability of public exploit code removes a meaningful barrier to exploitation.
Business impact
Organizations deploying MetaGPT 0.8.2 or earlier face a moderate but direct risk if threat actors with local system access attempt exploitation. The vulnerability could enable data exfiltration, unauthorized modification of AI-driven workflows, or denial of service within the application. Particular concern exists for multi-tenant environments, shared development systems, or containerized deployments where local privilege separation may be weaker. The lack of vendor response to early notification suggests a slower patch cycle, extending exposure windows.
Affected systems
FoundationAgents MetaGPT versions up to and including 0.8.2 are affected. The issue resides in the core schema validation logic, meaning any deployment running these versions that executes untrusted or semi-trusted local code paths is potentially vulnerable. Later versions and development branches beyond 0.8.2 should be verified against official vendor release notes to confirm remediation.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires local system access and valid user-level credentials; remote exploitation is not feasible. Public exploit code exists, indicating the barrier to weaponization is low for insiders or compromised local accounts. The attack requires no user interaction and succeeds deterministically if conditions are met. This profile—low barrier to local exploitation combined with published proof-of-concept—warrants priority for environments where insider threat or lateral movement by network attackers is a credible concern.
Remediation
Immediate mitigation requires upgrading MetaGPT to a patched version released after 0.8.2. Until an official fix is available, restrict local system access to trusted users, enforce principle of least privilege for service accounts running MetaGPT, and isolate development and production instances. Input validation for argument mappings should be hardened at the application level if in-house patching is necessary. Monitor for suspicious deserialization activity and local process spawning from MetaGPT contexts.
Patch guidance
Verify the latest stable release from the FoundationAgents MetaGPT project repository for a version newer than 0.8.2 that explicitly addresses CVE-2026-10566. Given the vendor's delayed initial response, cross-reference official release notes or security advisories to confirm the fix. Deploy in a staging environment before production rollout. If no patch is forthcoming, consider forking and applying the recommended input validation hardening, or evaluate alternative frameworks with stronger security postures.
Detection guidance
Monitor system logs for unusual local process execution originating from MetaGPT service accounts or development contexts. Track exceptions or errors within metagpt/schema.py, particularly in Message.check_instruct_content, which may indicate exploitation attempts. Implement runtime application self-protection (RASP) or system call filtering to flag suspicious deserialization calls. Audit local user accounts and privilege assignments to limit potential attack surface. Review argument mapping inputs to the affected function for anomalies or malformed serialized objects.
Why prioritize this
Despite a moderate CVSS score of 5.3, this vulnerability merits urgent attention because: (1) public exploit code is available, lowering the cost of attack; (2) the vendor has not yet responded or issued a patch, extending exposure; (3) the attack is local but requires only basic user privileges, making it viable in many real-world scenarios; (4) deserialization flaws are high-confidence code execution vectors. Organizations running MetaGPT in development or shared environments should prioritize patching and access control reviews.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 (Medium) reflects the combination of local-only attack vector, low privilege requirement, no user interaction, and confidentiality/integrity/availability impact. While the severity is not critical, the availability of public exploits, vendor unresponsiveness, and the proven reliability of deserialization attacks as a code execution primitive elevate real-world risk above the base numeric score. Organizations should treat this as higher priority than the raw severity suggests in the context of their threat model.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely?
No. CVE-2026-10566 requires local system access and valid user-level credentials. Remote exploitation is not possible under the vulnerability's constraints. However, if an attacker gains local access through another vulnerability or compromise, this flaw becomes immediately exploitable.
What versions of MetaGPT are affected?
Versions up to and including 0.8.2 are confirmed vulnerable. Always verify with the FoundationAgents MetaGPT official repository to determine if your specific version (especially any custom or patched builds) contains the fix.
Is a patch available yet?
As of the last update, the vendor had not responded to early notification and no official patch had been released. Check the project's GitHub releases or security advisories regularly for updates. If extended time passes without a fix, consider upgrading to an alternative framework or applying custom input validation hardening.
How can we protect ourselves if we cannot patch immediately?
Enforce the principle of least privilege for all service accounts running MetaGPT; restrict local system access to trusted users only; isolate MetaGPT deployments from production systems; monitor for unusual process execution and deserialization events; and implement input validation or WAF-style filtering on argument mappings to the affected function.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes to support security decision-making. The vulnerability details and severity reflect data available as of the publication date. Exploit availability and vendor response status may change. Organizations should verify patch status directly with FoundationAgents MetaGPT official sources and conduct their own risk assessment based on their deployment environment and threat model. No liability is assumed for reliance on this analysis in security operations or patch management decisions. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-0018MEDIUMAndroid AccessibilityManagerService Denial of Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0051MEDIUMAndroid UBSan Runtime Denial of Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0070MEDIUMAndroid DevicePolicyManagerService Local Denial of Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0085MEDIUMAndroid Contact Handler Denial of Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10004MEDIUMChrome UI Spoofing Vulnerability – Password Dialog Hijacking
- CVE-2026-10912MEDIUMChrome Extension Same-Origin Policy Bypass (CVSS 6.5)
- CVE-2026-10916MEDIUMChrome DevTools UXSS Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10938MEDIUMChrome Site Isolation Bypass via Input Validation Flaw