CVE-2017-20266: Joomla SP Movie Database 1.3 SQL Injection Vulnerability
Joomla SP Movie Database version 1.3 contains a flaw that allows attackers on the internet to steal sensitive data from the database without needing a login. An attacker can craft a malicious search query that tricks the database into executing unintended commands, exposing information like user credentials, private content, or system details. The vulnerability is accessed through the search feature, making it easy for attackers to discover and exploit.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.2 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-89
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-19 / 2026-06-22
NVD description (verbatim)
Joomla SP Movie Database 1.3 contains an SQL injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries by injecting malicious code through the searchword parameter. Attackers can send GET requests to the searchresults view with crafted SQL payloads in the searchword parameter to extract sensitive database information.
4 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2017-20266 is an SQL injection vulnerability in Joomla SP Movie Database 1.3 affecting the searchresults view. The searchword parameter fails to sanitize user input before constructing SQL queries, permitting unauthenticated remote code execution within the database context. Attackers send GET requests with SQL metacharacters and payloads embedded in the searchword parameter, which the application concatenates directly into queries without parameterized preparation. The vulnerability maps to CWE-89 (SQL Injection) and carries a CVSS v3.1 score of 8.2 (HIGH), reflecting high confidentiality impact with low integrity and no availability impact.
Business impact
A successful exploitation directly exposes database contents—user accounts, email addresses, content metadata, and potentially payment or system configuration data. For organizations running Joomla SP Movie Database, this creates immediate insider-threat risk: attackers could enumerate user accounts, forge administrative credentials if password hashes are exposed, or extract intellectual property stored in the database. Reputational damage follows disclosure of a data breach. Customer trust and regulatory compliance (GDPR, PCI-DSS if applicable) are at risk if personal or financial data leaks.
Affected systems
Joomla SP Movie Database version 1.3 is confirmed vulnerable. No vendor product list was provided in the vulnerability data; verification of your deployed version and any similar or derivative products should be undertaken against Joomla SP Movie Database's official documentation.
Exploitability
Exploitability is high. The vulnerability requires no authentication, no user interaction, and no special configuration—any network-accessible instance is at risk. Attackers need only craft a GET request to the searchresults view with a SQL injection payload in the searchword parameter. Public proof-of-concept details or automated exploit tools may exist for a 2017-era component, increasing the likelihood of active scanning and targeted attacks.
Remediation
Immediate action: identify all instances of Joomla SP Movie Database 1.3 in your environment and isolate or shut them down if not in active use. Contact the SP Movie Database vendor for a patched version; if none is available, evaluate alternative Joomla extensions or video management modules with demonstrated security track records. Implement input validation and parameterized queries if you maintain custom SQL code. Apply Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to block SQL injection patterns in the searchword parameter as a temporary mitigation.
Patch guidance
Check the official Joomla SP Movie Database website or the Joomla Extension Directory for available updates beyond version 1.3. Patch release notes and compatibility information should be verified before deploying to production. If the vendor has ceased support for version 1.3, plan migration to a maintained alternative. Test patches in a staging environment before production rollout, as they may introduce API changes or dependencies.
Detection guidance
Search logs for GET requests to searchresults view containing suspicious characters in the searchword parameter, such as single quotes, dashes, UNION, OR, EXEC, or SELECT keywords. Monitor database slow query logs and error logs for unusual SQL statements. Network-based detection can flag requests with SQL metacharacters to the vulnerable endpoint. Alert on any unauthorized data export or large result-set queries originating from the searchword parameter. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools should track process execution from the web application server that could indicate post-exploitation activity.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate remediation because it combines unauthenticated remote access, high data-confidentiality impact, and simple exploitability. A threat actor requires no tools beyond a web browser to steal sensitive database contents. The CVSS score of 8.2 reflects this severity. Although CVE-2017-20266 is not currently listed on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, the age and simplicity of SQL injection attacks mean weaponized code is likely available. Any organization still running version 1.3 is exposed to opportunistic scanning and nation-state reconnaissance.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS v3.1 score of 8.2 (HIGH) is driven by: (1) Network vector—attackers can exploit remotely without physical access; (2) Low attack complexity—no special conditions or configuration bypass needed; (3) No authentication required; (4) High confidentiality impact—full database read access is possible; (5) Low integrity impact—data modification is possible but secondary to data exfiltration; (6) No availability impact—the service remains operational. This scoring reflects a critical data-exposure risk suitable for urgent patching.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited without internet access to the server?
No. The vulnerability requires network-level access to the HTTP endpoint hosting the searchresults view. If the Joomla instance is behind a properly configured firewall or accessible only on an internal network, internet-based attackers cannot exploit it remotely. However, internal users or anyone with network access to the server remains at risk.
Will a Web Application Firewall (WAF) fully protect us while we await a patch?
A WAF can significantly reduce risk by detecting and blocking SQL injection payloads in the searchword parameter. However, WAF rules are not foolproof—sophisticated attackers may craft payloads designed to evade pattern-matching filters. WAF should be one layer of defense, not a replacement for patching or deprovisioning the vulnerable component.
If we don't use the search feature, are we still vulnerable?
Yes. The vulnerability exists in the code regardless of whether users actively invoke the search function. An attacker can directly send a crafted GET request to the searchresults view and trigger the SQL injection without relying on UI interaction. Disabling the search feature in the UI does not remove the underlying code flaw.
Is there a specific SQL injection payload known to work against this version?
We do not provide weaponized exploit code or specific payloads. However, SQL injection tutorials and proof-of-concept demonstrations for Joomla components are widely available. Your security team should conduct controlled testing in a lab environment to understand attack surface, or consult the vendor advisory and public security research for details.
This analysis is for informational purposes and based on the CVE record and CVSS assessment provided. Verify all technical details, patch availability, and version numbers against official vendor advisories and your specific deployment. No liability is assumed for decisions made using this intelligence. Always test patches in non-production environments before deployment. SEC.co does not provide legal or compliance advice; consult your legal and compliance teams regarding regulatory obligations related to this vulnerability. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-27. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2016-20062HIGHSQL Injection in Simply Poll 1.4.1 WordPress Plugin - Unauthenticated Data Theft
- CVE-2016-20063HIGHSQL Injection in Single Personal Message 1.0.3 – Credential & Data Theft Risk
- CVE-2016-20065HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in Product Catalog 8 WordPress Plugin
- CVE-2016-20068HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in WordPress Booking Calendar Contact Form 1.0.23
- CVE-2016-20069HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in WordPress Booking Calendar Contact Form 1.0.23
- CVE-2016-20071HIGHCritical SQL Injection in WordPress 404 Redirection Manager Plugin v1.0
- CVE-2016-20072HIGHBBS e-Franchise WordPress Plugin SQL Injection – Remote Data Exfiltration Risk
- CVE-2016-20073HIGHSQL Injection in Answer My Question 1.3 WordPress Plugin