HIGH 7.1

CVE-2026-9808: Mautic 7 API Authorization Bypass – Owner-Scope Bypass

Mautic 7's API has a flaw where user permission restrictions aren't being honored properly. Specifically, permissions designed to let users only see or edit their own resources (called 'owner-scope' restrictions) are being bypassed. An attacker with low-level API access can exploit this to view or modify other users' data, even though they shouldn't have that permission.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-863
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-05-29 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the Mautic 7 API v2 endpoints (utilizing API Platform). Under certain conditions, roles configured with owner-scope restrictions (such as `viewown` or `editown`) are not properly enforced. This allows low-privilege authenticated API users to bypass ownership-logic controls and access or modify resources belonging to other users.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-9808 is an authorization bypass in Mautic 7's API v2 endpoints implemented via API Platform. The vulnerability stems from improper enforcement of role-based access control (RBAC) logic, specifically owner-scope restrictions such as viewown and editown permissions. Authenticated users with low privilege levels can craft API requests that circumvent ownership validation, allowing them to access, retrieve, or modify resources associated with other user accounts. The flaw affects the authorization layer between API endpoint handlers and the data access layer.

Business impact

This vulnerability creates direct data exposure and integrity risks. Unauthorized access to customer, contact, or campaign data in Mautic instances could lead to data breaches affecting compliance obligations (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.), competitive intelligence theft, or reputation damage. The ability to modify other users' resources introduces the risk of data corruption, malicious campaign modifications, or unauthorized administrative actions. For multi-tenant or multi-team Mautic deployments, the blast radius is particularly wide since a single compromised low-privilege API token can access cross-tenant data.

Affected systems

Mautic 7 installations using API v2 endpoints are affected. The vulnerability applies to any deployment where the API Platform is active and role-based access control with owner-scope restrictions (viewown, editown, etc.) is configured. Organizations relying on Mautic's API for integrations, automation, or third-party tooling are at highest risk, particularly if API credentials are widely distributed or stored in external systems.

Exploitability

The vulnerability requires an authenticated API caller—meaning an attacker needs valid API credentials, either their own low-privilege account or a compromised token belonging to another user. No network complexity or user interaction is required; exploitation is deterministic and automated. The low barrier to exploitation (authentication only, no tricks required) and the straightforward nature of the bypass make this a practical risk in environments where API keys are shared, leaked, or obtained through social engineering.

Remediation

Apply the Mautic security patch addressing authorization enforcement in API v2 endpoints when available from the vendor. Until patched, restrict API access via network-level controls (IP whitelisting), disable API v2 endpoints if not needed, rotate and audit API tokens for suspicious activity, and implement compensating controls such as API gateway rules that enforce ownership validation. Review API token distribution and revoke unused or overly permissive tokens.

Patch guidance

Monitor Mautic's official security advisories and release notes for patches addressing CVE-2026-9808. Apply patches to all Mautic 7 instances as soon as they are available. Test patches in a staging environment first to ensure compatibility with custom integrations or extensions. After patching, audit API audit logs for signs of unauthorized data access during the vulnerability window. Verify that owner-scope restrictions are enforced by testing with low-privilege API accounts.

Detection guidance

Monitor API access logs for unusual patterns: low-privilege API users accessing resources with IDs outside their assigned ownership scope, bulk data retrieval requests, or modifications to resources owned by other users. Look for API v2 endpoint calls that retrieve or modify data with ownership IDs differing from the authenticated user's ID. Configure alerts on role-based access violations. Review API token usage logs for tokens used from unexpected IP ranges or at unusual times. Implement API gateway logging if available to capture detailed request/response metadata.

Why prioritize this

This vulnerability merits immediate attention due to its HIGH CVSS score (7.1), low attack complexity, low privilege requirement, and high confidentiality impact. It poses direct data breach and integrity risks to multi-user and multi-tenant Mautic deployments. The fact that it is not yet in the CISA KEV catalog does not diminish urgency; organizations should assume attackers are actively probing for this flaw once public details emerge. Priority should be highest for instances processing sensitive customer data.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 (HIGH) reflects: network-based attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), low privilege requirement (PR:L), no user interaction needed (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), high confidentiality impact (C:H), low integrity impact (I:L), and no availability impact (A:N). The high confidentiality rating reflects the ease of unauthorized data access; integrity is rated lower because modifications are possible but may be less likely in typical attack scenarios. The score appropriately captures the practical risk for multi-user environments.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need valid Mautic credentials to exploit this?

Yes. The vulnerability requires an authenticated API call, meaning an attacker must either have a legitimate low-privilege API token or have obtained one through credential compromise. However, the barrier is low: any user with API access can exploit it, and API keys are often shared more broadly than login credentials.

How do I know if my Mautic instance was exploited?

Check API audit logs for access patterns where low-privilege users retrieved or modified resources with ownership IDs belonging to other users. Also review recent API token activity, looking for unexpected geographic locations, IP addresses, or access times. If you have baseline logs from before this vulnerability was public, compare current usage patterns to those baselines.

Does this affect Mautic versions other than version 7?

The CVE is specific to Mautic 7 using API v2 endpoints with API Platform. Verify with the vendor whether earlier or later Mautic versions are affected. Organizations running other versions should still test and monitor, but should prioritize Mautic 7 installations.

Can compensating controls fully mitigate this risk before patching?

Network-level controls (IP whitelisting, API gateway validation) and token rotation can significantly reduce exposure, but they do not address the root cause. A fully privileged mitigation would require disabling API v2 endpoints or implementing a custom middleware that re-validates ownership at the gateway level. Patching is the definitive remediation.

This analysis is based on published CVE data as of June 2026. Vendor patches, affected version lists, and workaround effectiveness may evolve. Organizations should verify all details against official Mautic security advisories and test patches in controlled environments before production deployment. SEC.co does not endorse or recommend any specific third-party mitigations or detection tools. Use of this intelligence is at the reader's risk and responsibility. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-08. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).