CVE-2026-9050: Slider Revolution Plugin Authorization Bypass Allows Contributor-Level Plugin Deactivation
Slider Revolution, a popular WordPress plugin, contains a flaw that allows contributors and higher-privileged users to disable any plugin on a WordPress site without proper authorization checks. An attacker with basic contributor access—a common account level in multi-author sites—can leverage this to shut down security plugins, backup solutions, or other critical extensions. The vulnerability affects versions 6.0.0 through 6.7.55 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.14.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 4.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-862
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-02 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
The Slider Revolution plugin for WordPress in versions 6.0.0-6.7.55 and 7.0.0-7.0.14 is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to deactivate any active plugin installed on the site.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The Slider Revolution plugin fails to enforce proper authorization controls when processing plugin deactivation requests. The vulnerability stems from insufficient privilege verification (CWE-862: Missing Authorization), allowing authenticated users at the Contributor level and above to call plugin management functions without validation of their eligibility to perform such actions. The attack surface is network-accessible and requires only valid WordPress authentication credentials, making it exploitable in any multi-user WordPress environment where contributors are permitted.
Business impact
An attacker gaining contributor access to a WordPress site can selectively disable plugins, potentially including security hardening tools, two-factor authentication plugins, malware scanners, or backup solutions. This creates a pathway for follow-on attacks by removing defensive layers. In environments where contributor accounts are issued to freelancers, clients, or agency partners, the risk is elevated. The compromise of plugin availability could lead to undetected malicious activity, data loss, or compliance violations if audit and monitoring solutions are disabled.
Affected systems
WordPress installations running Slider Revolution versions 6.0.0–6.7.55 (all patch versions in that range) or 7.0.0–7.0.14 are vulnerable. The plugin is widely deployed across WordPress sites for slider and carousel functionality. Any WordPress site running one of these versions with multi-user capabilities or external contributor access is at risk. Single-admin sites with no contributor users have reduced exposure but should still patch as a precaution.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires valid WordPress authentication and Contributor-level or higher permissions. The attack is trivial to execute—no special tools, complex techniques, or user interaction are needed once access is obtained. In shared hosting environments, agency setups, or client-facing sites where contributor roles are common, the likelihood of exploitation is moderate to high. The simplicity of the attack and the prevalence of contributor accounts make this a practical concern for most multi-user WordPress deployments.
Remediation
Update Slider Revolution to a patched version addressing CWE-862 authorization bypass. Verify the vendor advisory for exact patched versions (expected to be 6.7.56 or later for the 6.x branch and 7.0.15 or later for the 7.x branch, but confirm against official releases). As an interim measure, restrict the Contributor role on high-risk sites or audit which users hold this level of access. Consider temporarily deactivating Slider Revolution if it is not actively in use pending patch availability.
Patch guidance
Monitor the official Slider Revolution plugin repository and vendor security advisories for patch availability. Patches are expected for both the 6.x and 7.x branches; apply updates to the appropriate version track for your installation. Test patches in a staging environment before production deployment to ensure compatibility with custom sliders and theme integrations. Enable automatic plugin updates if your security policy permits, or schedule immediate manual updates upon availability. Verify post-patch that all plugins remain active and functioning as expected.
Detection guidance
Review WordPress user audit logs for plugin deactivation events originating from Contributor-level accounts, particularly any mass or unexpected deactivations. Monitor for gaps in plugin coverage—compare your expected active plugin list against the current active list, especially security-focused extensions. Implement WordPress security logging that captures plugin management actions and associate them with specific user IDs. In SIEM environments, flag deactivation of security plugins by non-administrative users as a high-priority alert. Check the modified timestamp of plugin files and wp-content/plugins directory for suspicious changes coinciding with the vulnerability window.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is 4.3 (Medium), the practical risk is elevated due to the simplicity of exploitation, the prevalence of multi-user WordPress sites, and the potential for disabling security controls. The integrity impact is direct (deactivating plugins alters site security posture), and the attack requires only widely-issued Contributor access. Organizations with shared WordPress environments, agency hosting, or client portals should treat this as a higher priority. Patch immediately upon availability and audit current access before patches are released.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 reflects a network-accessible vulnerability requiring low privileges (Contributor) and no user interaction, but with limited direct impact (integrity only, no confidentiality or availability impact). However, this underweights the practical risk: the ability to disable security plugins creates a high-consequence follow-on attack vector. Organizations should contextualize this score within their specific user access model. Sites with strict contributor access controls face lower risk; sites with permissive or third-party contributor issuance face elevated risk justifying expedited patching.
Frequently asked questions
Can this be exploited by unauthenticated users?
No. The vulnerability requires valid WordPress authentication and Contributor-level access or higher. Attackers cannot exploit this via a direct web request without credentials. However, contributor accounts are often more readily available than admin accounts in multi-user environments, making the barrier to exploitation lower than for many plugins.
If we only have admin users on our WordPress site, are we affected?
Technically, you can still be exploited if a single admin account is compromised. However, the primary risk assumes an attacker already holds a legitimate or compromised Contributor role. Single-admin sites with strong password and MFA policies face reduced exposure, but should still patch as a precaution.
What happens after a plugin is deactivated via this vulnerability?
The plugin is disabled but not deleted. Site functionality relying on that plugin stops working. If a security plugin like a firewall or malware scanner is disabled, the site loses that protection. If a backup plugin is disabled, no new backups are created. An attacker could then escalate privileges, install backdoors, or exfiltrate data with reduced detection.
How do we know if this vulnerability was exploited on our site?
Check WordPress user audit logs for unexpected plugin deactivation events, especially by Contributor accounts. Review the plugin activity log (if available via logging plugins) to identify when and by whom each plugin was disabled. If you recently found plugins unexpectedly deactivated that your team did not disable, this may indicate exploitation. Verify against the affected version numbers as well.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as legal or compliance advice. Patch version numbers and availability dates should be verified against official vendor advisories and release notes; this document references expected versions and recommends confirmation before deployment. Organizations should assess this vulnerability within the context of their specific WordPress architecture, user access policies, and security controls. No exploit code or detailed attack reproduction is provided in this advisory. Security teams should conduct their own risk assessment and testing before deploying patches in production environments. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-08. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-12714MEDIUMRank Math SEO Plugin Unauthenticated Metadata Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-52766MEDIUMMissing Authorization in Printeers Print & Ship – CVSS 6.5
- CVE-2025-53302MEDIUMMissing Authorization in Anton Shevchuk Constructor Framework
- CVE-2025-53346MEDIUMMissing Authorization in ThimPress Thim Core 2.3.3
- CVE-2026-10616MEDIUMAuthorization Bypass in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw Task Completion
- CVE-2026-10815MEDIUMAuthorization Bypass in Hostel Management System PHP
- CVE-2026-10855MEDIUMMISP Event Template Authorization Flaw – Patch Guidance
- CVE-2026-27351MEDIUMMissing Authorization in Sekander Badsha Crew HRM—Patch Guidance & Risk Analysis