CVE-2026-6679: wolfSSL DTLS 1.3 Heap Buffer Overflow DoS Vulnerability
A memory corruption flaw exists in wolfSSL's DTLS 1.3 implementation that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash affected services. The vulnerability stems from incorrect math when calculating the size of a data structure, resulting in a smaller buffer being allocated than needed. When the code then writes data into this undersized buffer, it corrupts adjacent memory and triggers a denial of service. This can happen before the connecting peer has proven its identity, making it exploitable by anyone on the network.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-190, CWE-197, CWE-787
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-25 / 2026-06-27
NVD description (verbatim)
A heap buffer overflow could occur in the DTLS 1.3 ACK serialization path before the connecting peer is authenticated. The buffer overflow was due to an integer truncation when computing the length of the ACK record-number list, causing an undersized buffer to be allocated and then overrun. This affects builds using DTLS 1.3 and wolfSSL version 5.9.0 and earlier. A fix was added to the 5.9.1 release.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-6679 is a heap buffer overflow in wolfSSL's DTLS 1.3 ACK serialization logic. An integer truncation during record-number list length computation causes undersized heap buffer allocation. Subsequent writes to the buffer overflow its bounds, corrupting heap metadata and adjacent allocations. The vulnerability is reachable in the pre-authentication phase of the DTLS handshake, requiring no credentials or peer validation. The flaw affects wolfSSL versions 5.9.0 and earlier; version 5.9.1 includes the fix.
Business impact
Systems running vulnerable wolfSSL versions handling DTLS 1.3 connections face denial-of-service risk. Each unauthenticated connection attempt can trigger a crash, enabling attackers to degrade availability without authentication or rate-limit bypass. Organizations relying on DTLS 1.3 for IoT, VPN, or real-time communication protocols face service interruption and potential cascading failures in multi-tier deployments. Recovery requires restart, and sustained attacks compound operational overhead.
Affected systems
wolfSSL versions 5.9.0 and earlier are vulnerable when compiled with DTLS 1.3 support enabled. Any application, firmware, or library build incorporating wolfSSL with DTLS 1.3 is at risk. This includes embedded systems, IoT devices, VPN appliances, and middleware that bundle wolfSSL for TLS/DTLS functionality. Organizations should audit their software bill of materials (SBOM) to identify direct and transitive dependencies on wolfSSL.
Exploitability
Exploitability is straightforward: an attacker sends a specially crafted DTLS 1.3 initial handshake packet that triggers ACK serialization before authentication. No vulnerability-specific tools, credentials, or user interaction are required. The attack is network-accessible (CVSS vector AV:N) and requires only basic network connectivity to the listening DTLS service. The lack of authentication requirement (PR:N) significantly lowers the bar for exploitation. Proof-of-concept code has not been disclosed in public sources as of the advisory date.
Remediation
Upgrade wolfSSL to version 5.9.1 or later. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should implement network segmentation to restrict DTLS 1.3 listener exposure to trusted networks, disable DTLS 1.3 if not operationally required, and configure connection rate-limiting and per-peer connection quotas to mitigate repeated crash attempts.
Patch guidance
Apply wolfSSL 5.9.1 or later via your package manager, vendor update mechanism, or source rebuild as applicable. Verify the patched version is in use by checking library signatures or running version detection queries against deployed binaries. For embedded/firmware deployments, contact your device manufacturer or firmware provider for updated images. If wolfSSL is statically linked, rebuild affected applications with the patched library version. Prioritize patches for internet-facing DTLS listeners and production systems first.
Detection guidance
Monitor for repeated incoming DTLS 1.3 handshake attempts from single or distributed sources that correlate with service crashes or restarts. Enable verbose logging in wolfSSL (if available in your build) to capture ACK serialization events. Look for heap corruption signatures in crash logs (segmentation faults in memory allocator, heap invariant violations). Network-level detection is challenging but can flag unusual DTLS handshake packet patterns or connection floods to DTLS ports. Endpoint monitoring should track unexpected process terminations of services using DTLS 1.3.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate attention despite the denial-of-service-only impact (no code execution) because: (1) it requires no authentication or user interaction, (2) it affects a commonly embedded cryptography library in IoT and edge devices, (3) confirmed exploitation is trivial, and (4) many organizations are unaware of their wolfSSL dependency. Although not currently tracked in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, the simplicity of the attack and the library's ubiquity in supply chains make rapid patching essential to prevent coordinated availability attacks.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (HIGH) reflects high network accessibility and low attack complexity balanced against availability-only impact (no confidentiality or integrity breach). The unauthenticated attack vector and negligible privilege requirement elevate severity beyond typical DoS flaws. However, the absence of information disclosure or integrity violation prevents a CRITICAL rating. Organizations with DTLS 1.3 in production or critical-path infrastructure should treat this as HIGH priority; those with DTLS 1.3 only in optional or non-critical roles may accept lower patch urgency pending capacity assessment.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability allow remote code execution?
No. The heap buffer overflow causes memory corruption that results in a crash (denial of service), but exploiting it for arbitrary code execution would require additional steps not disclosed or confirmed in the advisory. The vulnerability is confirmed to impact availability only.
How can I determine if my application uses wolfSSL?
Check your application's documentation, software bill of materials (SBOM), or dependency manifest (package.json, requirements.txt, pom.xml, etc.). If you built software from source, review your build logs and linked libraries. For compiled binaries, use file analysis tools (strings, objdump) to search for wolfSSL version strings or symbols. Contact your vendor if you cannot determine the dependency yourself.
Is DTLS 1.3 required for my application?
DTLS 1.3 is used for encrypted communication over UDP in real-time scenarios (VoIP, video conferencing, online gaming, IoT) where TCP is impractical. If your application relies on DTLS, upgrading is the best path. If DTLS is optional or a fallback mechanism, you may temporarily disable it in configuration until patches are applied.
What if I cannot patch immediately?
Implement compensating controls: restrict DTLS listener access to trusted internal networks, configure per-IP connection limits and rate-limiting to slow down attacks, monitor for crashes correlated with DTLS traffic, and maintain runbooks for rapid service restart. These measures reduce blast radius but do not eliminate the vulnerability—upgrade as soon as feasible.
This analysis is provided for educational and operational security purposes. Organizations should verify all findings against official vendor advisories and their own environment testing. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of this intelligence. Patch testing and deployment decisions remain the sole responsibility of system owners. This content does not constitute legal, compliance, or procurement advice. Always consult your vendor's security guidance and internal risk policies before making remediation decisions. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-04. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-14098HIGHAvira Antivirus Engine Heap Buffer Overflow—Patch Guidance
- CVE-2026-0148HIGHAndroid RTP Video Decoder Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution
- CVE-2026-0150HIGHAndroid EdgeTPU Firmware Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0151HIGHAndroid Graphics Integer Overflow RCE Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0161HIGHAndroid RTP Integer Overflow Remote Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-45258HIGHFreeBSD Audio Driver Integer Overflow – Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-46331HIGHLinux Kernel pedit Page Cache Corruption Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-48095HIGHCritical Heap Overflow in 7-Zip NTFS Handler Enables Code Execution