HIGH 7.5

CVE-2026-59692: GStreamer DTLS Stack Buffer Overflow Denial of Service

GStreamer's DTLS (Datagram Transport Layer Security) plugin contains a stack buffer overflow flaw that occurs during the SSL/TLS handshake process. When a remote attacker sends a specially crafted certificate with an unusually long subject name, the plugin crashes trying to store that name in a fixed 2048-byte buffer. The result is a denial-of-service condition—any application using GStreamer's DTLS functionality can be knocked offline by an unauthenticated attacker without needing credentials or user interaction.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-121
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-07-09 / 2026-08-14

NVD description (verbatim)

A stack buffer overflow vulnerability was found in GStreamer's DTLS plugin. During a DTLS handshake, the peer certificate Subject Distinguished Name is printed into a fixed-size 2048-byte stack buffer without bounds checking. A remote unauthenticated attacker can send a certificate with an oversized Subject DN that exceeds the buffer, causing a stack buffer overflow and process crash, resulting in denial of service.

13 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

The vulnerability resides in GStreamer's DTLS implementation, specifically in certificate handling during the TLS handshake phase. The code copies a peer certificate's Subject Distinguished Name (DN) into a stack-allocated 2048-byte buffer without validating the length of the incoming data. Subject DNs can be arbitrarily large in X.509 certificates, allowing an attacker to exceed the buffer boundary. This classic stack overflow corrupts the stack frame, triggering a process crash. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-121 (Stack-based Buffer Overflow) and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (HIGH severity). The vector indicates network accessibility, low attack complexity, no privilege requirement, and no user interaction—factors that elevate risk despite the absence of confidentiality or integrity impact.

Business impact

Any service or application relying on GStreamer for real-time media processing with DTLS support becomes vulnerable to remote denial of service. Streaming servers, VoIP platforms, WebRTC applications, and networked media clients are at risk. An attacker can repeatedly crash processes, disrupting service availability without authentication. Organizations depending on GStreamer-based infrastructure face potential uptime degradation and operational burden in detecting and responding to attacks. The lack of authentication requirements means the threat surface includes any untrusted network segment from which a connection can be initiated to the vulnerable component.

Affected systems

GStreamer and applications embedding GStreamer's DTLS plugin are affected. This includes systems using gstreamer1.0-plugins-base (or equivalent) with DTLS support enabled. The vulnerability affects deployments in media streaming, real-time communications (particularly those using DTLS for secure RTP), and any application that processes incoming DTLS handshakes from untrusted peers. Specific product versions depend on when vendors integrated the vulnerable DTLS code; patched versions should be confirmed against vendor advisories.

Exploitability

Exploitability is straightforward: no authentication is required, the attack is network-based, and complexity is low. An attacker simply needs to initiate a DTLS handshake and present a certificate with a Subject DN field containing enough data to overflow the 2048-byte buffer. No special privileges are needed on the attacker's side, and the victim does not need to interact with or approve anything. The barrier to exploitation is minimal—standard certificate generation tools can be modified to embed oversized Subject DN values. However, widespread exploitation would depend on whether vulnerable versions are actively exposed on public networks or within organizational perimeters.

Remediation

Apply a patch from your GStreamer vendor or maintainer that implements proper bounds checking on the Subject DN before copying it into the stack buffer. The fix typically involves either dynamically allocating buffer space proportional to the actual DN length or validating and rejecting certificates with excessively long Subject DNs before processing. Until patched, mitigate by restricting network access to services using GStreamer's DTLS plugin, disabling DTLS if not required, or running such services in sandboxed or containerized environments to limit crash impact.

Patch guidance

Contact your GStreamer distribution or the primary GStreamer project for official security updates. Patches should be validated in a staging environment before production deployment. Verify the patched version explicitly addresses CVE-2026-59692 in the release notes. If you maintain a custom GStreamer build, apply the upstream fix that adds bounds checking to the Subject DN handling code in the DTLS plugin. Test that DTLS handshakes with normal certificates still function correctly after patching.

Detection guidance

Monitor for repeated GStreamer process crashes or restarts, particularly in applications or services handling DTLS traffic. Intrusion detection systems can flag malformed or oversized certificate fields in TLS/DTLS handshake traffic, though such detection requires deep packet inspection and understanding of X.509 structure. Logging and alerting on abnormal certificate Subject DN lengths (significantly exceeding typical DN sizes of a few hundred bytes) may help identify attack attempts. Application crash dumps and core files should be analyzed for stack corruption patterns consistent with buffer overflow.

Why prioritize this

This vulnerability rates HIGH priority because it combines network accessibility with low attack complexity and no authentication requirement. While the impact is limited to denial of service (not confidentiality or integrity), the ease of exploitation and the potential to disrupt critical media streaming or real-time communication services make it a candidate for prompt patching. Organizations running GStreamer-based services exposed to untrusted networks should prioritize remediation. The fact that no authentication is required and exploitation can be automated elevates urgency relative to other denial-of-service bugs.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflects a HIGH-severity vulnerability driven by three factors: (1) Network vector—the attack originates remotely with no special network access required; (2) Low attack complexity—no unusual conditions or trick are needed; (3) Availability impact—process crashes directly harm service availability. The score is moderated because confidentiality and integrity are unaffected; this is purely a crash condition, not an information disclosure or code execution. The 7.5 score appropriately signals that while serious and requiring attention, it is not as critical as remote code execution vulnerabilities.

Frequently asked questions

Can this vulnerability lead to remote code execution?

No. The vulnerability causes a process crash due to stack corruption, resulting in denial of service only. While stack buffer overflows can theoretically enable code execution, this particular case impacts only availability. There is no evidence or expectation of RCE exploitation; the impact is limited to service disruption.

Do I need a DTLS certificate to exploit this?

No. The attacker sends a malicious certificate during the handshake, so the attacker's certificate can be self-signed or crafted specifically for the attack. The victim does not need to validate or trust the attacker's certificate—the overflow occurs during the parsing of the peer certificate before trust decisions are made.

Which GStreamer versions are affected?

The source data provided does not specify affected version ranges. Consult the official GStreamer security advisory, your distribution's security notices, or vendor advisories to determine which versions in your environment are vulnerable. Typically, versions released before the patch publication date (after 2026-07-09) are at risk.

Can I disable DTLS to mitigate this without patching?

Yes, if DTLS is not required by your application, disabling the DTLS plugin or avoiding DTLS-based connections eliminates the attack surface. However, if DTLS is essential (e.g., for secure RTP in WebRTC), patching is the proper remediation. Verify with your application documentation whether DTLS can be safely disabled.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes and based on the vulnerability data available as of the publication date. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of this information to your specific environment. Vulnerability details, patch availability, and affected product versions should be verified against official vendor advisories and security bulletins. Organizations are responsible for assessing risk within their own infrastructure and implementing appropriate controls. This document does not constitute legal, compliance, or professional security advice. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-17. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).